Reply With Quote
Duncan was never as dominant in his peak as Shaq.
Wow, you mean English is your 1st language and you can't figure out "wasn't" is the opposite of "was"?You are wrong for the 3rd time. But I keep forgetting. English is your 2nd language. You don't know any better. I forgive you son.
I mean, seriously, I said, explicitly, " it wasn't chump change", and you, with your 1st language ability, directly interpreted that I said "it was chump change"?
Shouldn't you be embarrassed by it now? Getting lectured on your own language by a foreigner?
Are you good at anything? Anything at all? I mean, what the ?
So when I said "Kobe is NOT a top 10 player of all time", do you read it as me saying "Kobe is a top 10 player of all time"?
Duncan was never as dominant in his peak as Shaq.
Dudley > MeloDuncan was as dominant as Shaq.
"Look at these advanced stats! Look at these advanced stats!"
"Look at these advanced stats I copy-pasted because they made my mancrush look good!"
That's pretty bad, I think cavs win with a healthy Irving. Make curry work on the other end.
Numbers say otherwise.
Whether you define dominance as absolute or an optical effect is up for debate though.
Curry won't guard him as the series go on.
No. Duncan was never as dominant, numbers or optical. Not in their peak.
Numbers say otherwise. Duncan matched shaqs dominance if you factor in both offense and defense along with pace.
so he wasn't as dominant on offense without factoring those in? Got it
Players can't be dominant defensively?
With this and the Irving topic, I just realized I'm talking to a re .
So when someone says "dominant in their peak" they are usually referring to defense?
Dominant is an entire game. Not just offense.So when someone says "dominant in their peak" they are usually referring to defense?
If you want to talk about dominant offensively, you say dominant offensively.
Which Duncan still wasn't as dominant as Shaq.
Arguing semantics over the definition of the word "dominant". Definitely not reaching at all.
Duncan led the league in ws twice, bpm and vorp once each, drating three times, all during shaqs prime.
Shaq led the league in ws twice, bpm twice, vorp once and never in drating and orating.
Yes, because I never thought people would ever think ignoring half the court in comparing players dominance.
talking to the other dip
Not as dominant, just a better basketball player.
And Shaq shot 58% for his career. Duncan?
Tyson chandler shot 59% for his career, was he dominant.
What other criteria are you going to come up with? I'm waiting for you to say shaq is more dominant because he had the hairier ass crack the last time you checked.
Lollard better than Irving
Wall better than IrvingLollard better than Irving
Tyson Chandler averaged 5.6. Shot attempts for his career. Shaq averaged 16. Shut your simple ass up
Wall better than Irving
Now FGA matters? Could you list out all the criteria you consider for dominance? You just like to randomly pull things out.Tyson Chandler averaged 5.6. Shot attempts for his career. Shaq averaged 16. Shut your simple ass up
So far, we have:
1) It's strictly offensive, defense doesn't count
2) FG%, but must be in combination with FGA
3) Looks like it
What else is there? Does a player has to be 300lbs or over, has the initials S.O., uses his mother's maiden name for his last name, require an apostrophe in his name?
When numbers don't support you, just pull up weird random things.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions