9 Killed in Black Church Shooting in South Carolina

[Blake]

I guarantee you when I was in my prime I could have killed 9 church goers with a ball pen hammer if I had been so inclined.

I guarantee you could kill 9 out of your prime with a semi automatic

[m>s]

If the cuck bans me what choice will i have? Babby cant handle the bants so he wants to silence me.

[Clipper Nation]

Serious question, if that guy had a semi automatic, how many more people could he have hypothetically killed?

How many lives could have been saved if civilians were allowed to have guns in China?

[spurraider21]

Umm, you know, actually run a background check? See if the buyer has malicious intentions? Talk to his/her friends and family? See if they're looking to do mass murder?

A dude who espouses wanting to create a "race war" should be denied. Would you want to live in a neighborhood with m>s armed to the teeth? I know for sure I wouldn't.

talk to friends, check his facebook, etc... how long do you think that would/should take per person and how much $ would it take? that's the kind of background check that's run when you apply for a govt job, not to make a purchase. it's going to have to be some automated system, but maybe there needs to be more information other than crimes convicted... maybe any incident reports, reports of violent behavior from schools, etc... but you cant reasonably have a dragged out process like you are proposing

[ChumpDumper]

I guarantee you when I was in my prime I could have killed 9 church goers with a ball pen hammer if I had been so inclined.

The Avante of mass murder, ladies and gentlemen.

[Blake]

How many lives could have been saved if civilians were allowed to have guns in China?

Maybe some maybe none. Maybe gun toter is a horrible shot and kills more. Maybe crowd is too thick.

My question is based on how many bullets someone can fire off with a semi

[m>s]

talk to friends, check his facebook, etc... how long do you think that would/should take per person and how much $ would it take? that's the kind of background check that's run when you apply for a govt job, not to make a purchase. it's going to have to be some automated system, but maybe there needs to be more information other than crimes convicted... maybe any incident reports, reports of violent behavior from schools, etc... but you cant reasonably have a dragged out process like you are proposing

So because a person ever got into some sort of altercation they can never own a firearm? You just repealed the 2nd amendment across the board.

[Blake]

The Avante of mass murder, ladies and gentlemen.

[Blake]

So because a person ever got into some sort of altercation they can never own a firearm? You just repealed the 2nd amendment across the board.

I'm good with that. Make a new one tbh

[m>s]

I'm good with that. Make a new one tbh

That's ridiculous, no one could ever own one. We've all gotten into fist fights growing up as kids. You're a hardcore real to life commie or at least you're acting just like one.

[Blake]

That's ridiculous, no one could ever own one. We've all gotten into fist fights growing up as kids. You're a hardcore real to life commie or at least you're acting just like one.

Neh, I'm fine with gun ownership, just not this ridiculously absurd "right to bear arms".

2nd amendment honks are some of the dumbest people I know. Barely above Bible beater on the IQ scale.

[Clipper Nation]

Neh, I'm fine with gun ownership, just not this ridiculously absurd "right to bear arms".

2nd amendment honks are some of the dumbest people I know. Barely above Bible beater on the IQ scale.

So you're fine with gun ownership except for the part where people actually own guns. Basically you're the Karl Marx of cucks.

[Blake]

So you're fine with gun ownership except for the part where people actually own guns. Basically you're the Karl Marx of cucks.

basically you're trying hard to be clever and instead it's gibberish

[spurraider21]

So because a person ever got into some sort of altercation they can never own a firearm? You just repealed the 2nd amendment across the board.

i never said that, i was just giving examples. maybe it would be a contributing factor... what if you've had multiple incidents. it could be a factor, not an end-all-be-all

but maybe its a good idea to not sell deadly weapons to people who are prone to violent behavior?

[hitmanyr2k]

Maybe some maybe none. Maybe gun toter is a horrible shot and kills more. Maybe crowd is too thick.

My question is based on how many bullets someone can fire off with a semi

This reminds me of some jackass on the news saying if the moviegoers were armed in the theater James Holmes' shooting spree could have been stopped. Because random citizens with guns trying to shoot someone in a dark theater isn't a recipe for disaster

[Blake]

This reminds me of some jackass on the news saying if the moviegoers were armed in the theater James Holmes' shooting spree could have been stopped. Because random citizens with guns trying to shoot someone in a dark theater isn't a recipe for disaster

Ah you missed the dude on this board that said he would have taken him out. mingus I think.

He also alluded to making around 40k a month but that's neither here nor there

[Blake]

And since typically sit in the front, I would have had a damn good chance of blowing his brains out.

Lol

[Blake]

Thanks. And that is pretty much what I was getting at.

I think had there been several people in the audience will-trained in firearms and aware of their surrroundings, it isn't a leap of faith at all to assume the guy would have gone down in ten seconds or less.

So good

[Spurminator]

"aware of their surroundings"

What a sad existence to always be on high alert for serial killers.

[m>s]

i never said that, i was just giving examples. maybe it would be a contributing factor... what if you've had multiple incidents. it could be a factor, not an end-all-be-all

but maybe its a good idea to not sell deadly weapons to people who are prone to violent behavior?

So then it's subjective and up to the interpretation of whom? Will they also be looking at your voting record and party affiliation when making the decision on whether or not you get to have the right to bear arms? You see where this is headed right.

[spurraider21]

So then it's subjective and up to the interpretation of whom? Will they also be looking at your voting record and party affiliation when making the decision on whether or not you get to have the right to bear arms? You see where this is headed right.

no, where is it headed?

i was told that gay marriage was also headed to beastiality

[mingus]

Ah you missed the dude on this board that said he would have taken him out. mingus I think.

He also alluded to making around 40k a month but that's neither here nor there

Well maybe as a society should change the way we do things. If we can't trust trained gun users in the near dark, then have the lights on in the theaters. It'd suck not being able to get a HJ or BJ at the movies but it's something I'd be willing to make a compromise on, assuming movie theaters lower the price on concessions.

In the case of what happened in Charleston, have someone in church that's carrying a concealed weapon. Arm pastors and/or priests.

[ChumpDumper]

Well maybe as a society should change the way we do things. If we can't trust trained gun users in the near dark, then have the lights on in the theaters. It'd suck not being able to get a HJ or BJ at the movies but it's something I'd be willing to make a compromise on, assuming movie theaters lower the price on concessions.

In the case of what happened in Charleston, have someone in church that's carrying a concealed weapon. Arm pastors and/or priests.

Live in constant fear.

No thanks.

[m>s]

no, where is it headed?

i was told that gay marriage was also headed to beastiality

The point is it's s right and not something up for interpretation. That's why we have clearly defined codes and laws, x is legal y is illegal, x offense carries a punishment of y etc. it's called the cons ution and rule of law and it's set us apart from other countries for quite some time now.

[m>s]

Live in constant fear.

No thanks.

Shut up you posting freak you're the one shilling away feverishly in fear of the right rising.