What is your point about them again?
Brushing what off?
What is your point about them again?
Just curious, why would it?
Employers are required to reasonably accommodate religious beliefs. Blakes cuckvengeance on conservative christian clerks probably isn't a religious accommodation when someone else is willing to sign off on the certificate.
The State can certainly reshuffle their personnel if one or more of them can't perform their duties due to religious objections. It certainly wouldn't be grounds for termination.
Exactly my point.
And so you think accommodations should be made for clerks who refuse to issue licenses to interracial couples?
The "Slippery slope" argument is usually bull . But when religious beliefs are involved it seems increasingly valid. Find a random verse from the bible and use it to discriminate against people. Where does it end?
Is there such a thing as a sincerely held religious belief, as that term is defined in the case law, that allows something like that?
Why not? How do you define a "sincerely held belief"? I'm sure many in the south would argue yes (and from what I've read about the historical south, this in fact happened).
Thanks. Here I was thinking more and more christians are using "religious beliefs" to discriminate against people. Silly me.![]()
Man, that's such a great question. If only there was a SCOTUS case or two defining it and, , maybe even applying it?
So show us the cases then. Since you clearly know everything there is to know about the subject.
Or skip the cases. How is it any different to say you have a religious objection to issuing marriage licenses to an interracial/interfaith couple? There are passages in the bible which specifically mention that.
What religion has this as a tenet? Which religion has its believers practice this?
You can shepherdize US v. Seeger.
Christianity and Judaism. It's in the scriptures.
Should a Salafi be able to deny a woman a drivers license based on religious exception?
I'm sure the DMV could find a sexual to issue the license.
lol that was vy's serious answer.
^lipstick on a pig. You've conceded the point a person can be forced to issue the license.
Yeah what's wrong with it tough guy?
I've conceded the point that the DMV should reasonably accommodate someone's religious preferences if another worker can issue a license. How did you not get that?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)