Reply With Quote
You've already conceded the person with the deeply held belief has to issue the license if the gay guy calls in sick. It's a ty argument and laughable a lawyer would float it...
Why would the woman care who gives her the license so long as she gets one? Have her rights been violated in any way by having the Salafi pass her over to another worker? Why is she driving in the first place and why are you such a get?
You've already conceded the person with the deeply held belief has to issue the license if the gay guy calls in sick. It's a ty argument and laughable a lawyer would float it...
What if no one wants to issue the license?
I got your ty point just fine. But you conceded the bigot must issue the license if no one else will.
That's a different scenario. If the DMV has one and only 1 salafi worker, then he cannot be reasonably accommodated, and has to issue the license. How often does this happen. Please be specific in your answer.
ty lawyer getting emotional.
Why's it ty? Saying so doesn't make it so.
Crofl playing the emo card. Last refuge of a slurper who's got nothing left besides "thats ty!" and "you've conceded my point!"
What if there are 100 people and none of them want to issue the license?
Th'slurper, can you please point me to all these DMVs with only two workers: a gay guy and a salafi?
How likely is that scenario? Be specific, tough guy.
It's a hypothetical, tough guy.
What if there are 100 people and none of them want to issue the license?
Your hypothetical is implausible, tough guy.
What if America turns into a country of religious bigots or s? What happens then CD?
Why is it implausible? Saying so doesn't make it so. Ever been to the rural south?
Give it a try there, tough guy.
What if there are 100 people and none of them want to issue the license?
You're deflecting. Fine. Accommodate all you want. The reality is that when it comes down to it, you agree the person with the deeply held religious belief CAN be forced to issue the license.
As as soon as you conceded that, you lost the ing argument and everything else is lipstick on a pig...
thats the law.
Why the stonewalling, tough guy?
On the plus side, it's nice to finally see Republicans at least pretend to give a about government workers, though.
Congrats on being caught up to speed on what was said on page 1 of this thread.
In your implausible hypothetical yes they can be forced to issue a license. As a practical matter, can you cite to a single instance where this has been the case? Or is likely to be to the case? Or are you just scoring empty points?
No stonewalling. When has this ever happened?
Please, won't someone think of the fundamentalist clerks!
It's a hypothetical, tough guy.
What if there are 100 people and none of them want to issue the license?
Man, Simpson's images huh? You're like a more intelligible Fabbs.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
