Right now I'm getting at you being a loser and a joke to me, completely impotent and non threatening in any way. And possibly mentally ill, why would you think ohm would be defending me? Only a paranoid schizophrenic would.
Who said anything about me being threatening? And great we have out of the way that you have no respect for me, think I am gay, etc. Like I said, machismo speaks differently to me than you intend, chachi.
I just want to know why you have distanced yourself from your rhetoric and won't own it anymore.
Because I'm posting from a different country than I was previously
Why would that make a difference?
Make up your mind. Are you a hero (separating yourself from "cowards"), or are you "simply bringing it up".so trying to talk about something is where the cowardice is huh? means that I think I am a "Internet warrior for society's ills" for simply bringing it up?
Only one making this about me is you and your fellow semen shielders. Could you try and act a little more insecure on this subject?
Also, you never answered the question about who I am shielding.
I'm calling you a coward. You being a coward does not make me brave. You suck at logic. EMotional make up is not a zero sum game, insecure one. Personally, I don't think this is a big deal to bring up. Youre the one that feels I'm trying to be big and by your zero sum logic that means it makes you feel small.
That's all you and as for who your semenshielding, I would say any of the others that have come to this thread and try to pressure me into not talking about race war rhetoric and it's place.
Anyway this round and round is boring. If you want to talk try and apply zero sum logic some more I'll just ignore it. If you want to put on your big boy pants and address the issue then great.
Dude, look at your thread le. You are using a real life tragedy to troll a specific poster. That doesn't tell me that you are looking for a serious discussion about race war rhetoric. It tells me that your intent is to embarrass and humiliate m>s. You understand that by doing so, you are going to illicit responses that you deserve. You're not even trolling well. You should have made a legit thread about the subject and let the comparisons to m>s occur naturally. By specifically calling out m>s, you are dodging real discussion. You lack courage in your conviction. It's just a weak cheap shot.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
