Do we know that Tavares is the point of contention? Or is it speculation on our parts?
Link?
Here's mine:
http://www.ajc.com/news/sports/baske...ue-rost/nmsQJ/
If you have something else, I'd be glad to read it.
Do we know that Tavares is the point of contention? Or is it speculation on our parts?
Rumor is there is a hicup with the deal in that Spurs are expecting something back. Tavares is pure speculation.
Yeah I hope we get him but I don't think we even have the cap space to take him back, do we?
Chinook? I thought we needed to trade splitter for cap space and get some picks or rights to players. So since they signed Tavares we probably won't get him.
Have I understood this correctly?
Rumor from where?
Thanks!![]()
Spurs do have the cap space if Tim takes a certain amount, but that's not known.
Apparently Chris Broussard said on Sportscenter there's a hangup in the Splitter deal with Atlanta.
Ah ok thanks DPG
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...=1#post8103043
Everything else is just speculation though.
supposedly Broussard on espn last night.
If true, hopefully hang-up just means "another component (player)" vs. there is a problem with the deal in it's entirety.
Anyone thinking SA after landing LMA/West/Manu/DG/Kawhi would let the deal fall through is absolutely messed up in the head.
Agree. But that is the very reason Bud has all the leverage. It means more to the Spurs than Atlanta.
True, but Splitter would be big for Atlanta, even for a 1st rounder.
They can't trade him until 30 days after signing him. So yeah, he's probably not going to be a Spur. The team still has room for to add him for a deal starting at the min. So they can still sign him. Or Tim/Aldridge could take a little less (like $200k each) to make it happen. But probably not.
No videos with that as a subject on ESPN....
I'm thinking Muscala is more likely than Tavares
Atlanta lost Antic... so it is like replacing their 2nd string center with a 1st string championship center. That's a sweat deal, considering Splitter is under $10m per.
Yeah I'm skeptical too but it's not like ESPN puts videos online of every segment of Sportscenter. I don't know, take it up with BatManu20![]()
Last edited by NASpurs; 07-08-2015 at 03:40 PM. Reason: better worded
I'd rather have a pick. I actually don't dislike him, but the Spurs better not be stashing their picks only to use a million in cap space on that guy.
True, I still don't understand Mulitinov being their stash
I'm so confused with you. That guy is wayyyyyyyyyyy better than whom they could have gotten with their picks this year IMO. By getting Muscala, that effectively turned out to be their 1st rounder this year instead of stashing and getting someone that I believe already posted an PER of 18+ last year in his first or 2nd season.
if Bud s this up, CIA Pop will haunt him for the rest of his life
Dudes, there is literally no chance of the trade not going through. None. The only way that would even be possible is if SA knew they could immediately do another trade in the same mold.
But let's say the cap jumps like we think and Tim takes 4M instead of 6 - that would leave enough room to land a player like the one's discussed.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)