Reply With Quote
Top-55 protected in this draft. Nothing afterwards. So it's essentially nothing.
Could you at least do a French accent? This is pretty vanilla. Haha I'm porker, I say things like I will not pass,,I will eat, but get this......It's first person! Giggle giggle giggle.
Top-55 protected in this draft. Nothing afterwards. So it's essentially nothing.
A non guarantee minimum salary.
Think of the savings! Vlade really pulled their fat out of the fire on that one. Would've hit the tax for sure.
Yup. But the Kings' FO couldn't find their arse with both hands. They are almost outdoing KAHN!!!!! in the incompetence stakes at this point.
When they trade Dumbarcus they pass KAHN!!!!!.
May not be significant but it is what it is.
I think Chinook wants to make it top 50 protected. Not sure but I imagine Charlotte pick has better value if unprotected but is more likely to be protected. No matter what it's a good trade but it could be structured to be an absolute salary dump of the second round pick turns out to be heavily protected
Hmmm...Well all I know is this guy has a killer crossover on 2k.
Maybe not 6'3". But, he's huge in comparison to Bryce Cotton, who we were considering. He's not huge for the position, but big enough to be effective on a lot of guys. What's NOT to love about this trade. Great value. Parker may be able to finally rest some in the regular season. He's been playing too many minutes with Manu and Patty injuries. Rest for Parker would be so sweet. Freakin' awesome.
Insignificant.
*shrug*
Imagine the outrage when spurfan finds out the Spurs won't be drafting another player they never heard of!
I'd like to see Ray try and move this boulder from the starting spot tbh:
Jesus Christ.....
The Charlotte second is not a useless pick, even though it'll never be conveyed. It allows the Spurs to trade for something without having to give an asset. Take this case for example.
Well anyone who gets sold outright for a second round draft pick can't be all bad.
I'm searching for the old "Sign Ray McCallum" threads, but search must be broken.
Such conditions could be put on any pick.
The Charlotte pick already has those conditions. So the Spurs don't have to put them on anything extra. Also, protecting the Spurs' pick for top-55 doesn't prevent it from being conveyed. They're expected to get a bottom-five second as it is. So it's not the same thing.
Is that the only protection that can ever be applied?
In b4 Luke Ridnour...
For the Spurs on that pick? Yes. Top-55 is the max protection you can put, but you can also put negative protection (like 36-60 protected), but that has a pretty obvious downside.
Kid can play. I assume he gets better in this system, solid get for the FO
Just saw this on Twitter:
Kevin Pelton @kpelton 18m18 minutes ago
Good note from ESPN's indispensible Nick Silva: Ray McCallum must be acquired via cap room, so the Spurs lose $422K they can offer Duncan.
But as Bruno noted, by trading for him, one of the roster charges go away freeing up $500k and by signing TD first another roster charge goes away freeing up another $500k. So essentially no impact on TD's offer.
More explanation on Twitter:
Kevin Pelton @kpelton 26m26 minutes ago
The "Minimum Player Salary Exception" for trades only applies to players on 1- or 2-year contracts. McCallum's in the 3rd year of his deal.
It is still 422k less to duncan because duncan's roster charge goes away when he is signed anyways and the 422 comes from 922-500.
I guess I can live with a poor man's Cojo. Spurs have a lot of molding left to do with McCallum. Maybe Engelland can help get McCallum's 3 point shot back.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
