Indeed.
The Spurs have been built by NOT overpaying player. The last player the overpaid for, I'm we all know who he is, it didn't turn out so well (I'm not talking about Parker).
Spurs pay FMV or BMV for players. That is why they sustain the success they have had over the years. Spurs are the best at developing scrubs or castaways and making them very good NBA players.
Indeed.
O'Quinn throughout this thread? Talk about setting the bar low..lol. Seems obvious Spursfans been beat down by FAs so many times in past, too gunshy to have much faith in idea that they could actually snag a big fish
Well said.
It wasn't about luring a big fish (there was a Pick-3 thread covering that). It was about having a limited amount of cap space in light of the re-signings. The Spurs didn't have a max slot open after Parker took his extension. It didn't seem obvious that Tim was coming back, so trading Splitter wasn't really an option (and Tiago was coming off an awesome playoff run).
So the idea was that the Spurs had $15 Million to replace Tim and Manu and remain compe ive. It's easy to see how differently it turned out now. But this off-season wasn't even a consideration in May, let alone in October.
Interesting take![]()
Kyle O'Quinn, really?
LMA will be a free agent in 2015 and he is a Texan, Spurs should sign him instead of Kyle O'Quinn.
Typical delusional Spurs fan.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)