Reply With Quote
It's plain for anyone to see when you started posting here. You're playing the caveat card again, trying to weasel your way out of it. Ironically you befriend those who's likeness you detest.
Absolutely. I'll be dragging that BFH (big ing hammer) out boundlessly.
lmvictoriousao!!!
It's plain for anyone to see when you started posting here. You're playing the caveat card again, trying to weasel your way out of it. Ironically you befriend those who's likeness you detest.
You're the one who's waffling after you stipulated to the facts. You can dish. You cannot take it.
ha, ha.
they are all going ot be in the lottery for at least the next 5 years. Dallas may sneak in here and there, but doubt it.
I've always known you to be a honorable man, so, I believe you, Cul
Portland if they commit to tanking.
Lakers tanked successfully for two years and have very little talent to show for it. They have to hope one of those guys becomes an all star to hope to get a FA to sign.
Blazers have lillard.
Dallas will have to start at zero. Probably a three year tank.
Knicks are disqualified because they play in the kids conference. They could easily make playoffs but that isn't much success compared to the same in the west
Kobe: 5/7
Duncan: 5/6
I don't get the argument...
THAT is the trump card..although we all know zombie parrot will just deflect with his same used up polly-want-a-cracker replies. (Much like you would expect a pre-teen to do)
No, the trump card as you put it is when they were selling your & stringing your ropes.
You ain't livin' that down. No. Absolutely not. I'll take that into the grave with me.
6/6 > 5/6 > 5/7 > 2/6
tbh...
6/6 > 5/6 > 5/7 > 2/6
Here, let me boil it down for ya, UNT:::
Kobe: 5
the tired old bag Duncan: 2nd 5th
Duncan: 2nd 5th
Kobe: 3rd 5th
Let us proceed.....
No. What Kobe has put in there (5) has stayed in there. Duncan is the one who put his 1st 5th in there and they made him take it out and give it to Miami. Dunk was upset at Amy and he let it affect his game.
Solly Cholly, but, that's the cold, hard truth.
Ya..BARELY losing one of the best finals matchups in history of NBA. Thats what you hang your hat on? lol NBA strings ropes turdsmoker. And pretty sure the SPURS didnt try to sell . Your whole little schtick was ill conceived from the jump. Heres the facts..not much troll material to work with regarding Spurs, so you have to reach or just make up to even come up with something as lame as 2nd 5th and stringin ropes. Who has the better winning percentage in finals in this era? Now go gum some geritol father time
Your former assistant coach didn't think so at the time. To him it was a fata compli. He thought it over. over over.
And they were selling your on the television, bub. Of course they quit when it went the other way, but, they sold some .
(((And BARELY doesn't count Axe. You know better. Don't ever say it again, or, I will follow you all the days of your NBA Forum life.)))
It seems like Jackson is putting in the minimum effort to get idiots like Dolan to continue to pay him 10's of millions of dollars. I don't know if the game passed him by or he just doesn't actually give a rat's ass as long as the checks keep coming in. (Can't really blame him.)
Even though I don't think Kobe>Duncan and never will....
I hate the argument that 5/6 is somehow better than 5/7. 7 Finals appearances is somehow worse than 6 Finals appearances?
It's just like Lakers fan saying they would rather not make the playoffs than lose in the Finals...I just don't get it.
BARELY got..and Spurs never sold ya dolt
I'd rank the Mavs first because I believe in Cuban and Donnie, plus when Dirk retires it would be nice to finally have a real franchise player who is capable of playing both ends of the floor and not be a liability on the defensive end.
Depends how you define brighter future. If you mean being a contender, then:
1) Portland - Already got a decent base, owner with deep pockets, only game in town, cap room, history of drafting well
2) Lakers - Once Kobe come off the books, LA will become a great destination again. The question is how well can Chaz build a team. But talent will let you contend. That said, ability to draft is horrible.
3) Mavs - Passionate owner (Too passionate at times), big city, state tax, drafts reasonably well, attractive destination for FAs
4) Knicks - Even though it's a great location, the management of this team is just a joke. As long as Dolan is at the helm, the Knicks will be horrible.
If by actually winning a ring:
1) Lakers - history is on their side
2) Mavs, Knicks, Portland - don't really see them winning one in the next couple of decades.
This t-mac troll is in fact a Locket fan under the cover of a mavs troll account, his only aim of creating this troll is to demean our hero Dirk and our beloved boys in blue as a whole, tbh.
Wow, damn tough question. As a fan I wouldn't be terribly thrilled with what any of these teams is doing.
1) Blazers. Young team. Not much good going for them, but not much bad either. Some prospects to enjoy watching.
2) Lakers. You've gotta be excited about the possibilities for this team after Kobe is finally sent to the glue factory and they can pursue free agents again. A few young guys to root for in the meantime.
3) Mavs. Stuck between rebuilding and competing. Despite being obnoxious, your own is doing his best to put good product on the floor.
4) Knicks. Team is no fun to watch and Fisher and Jackson haven't done anything to win anyone's confidence.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions