Reply With Quote
Why are you guys defending a cuckold?
Yeah, weak . You're literally nothing but a semen shield for david kimbrell in this thread.
Don't you have any respect for yourself?
Why are you guys defending a cuckold?
Cuckolds fly together, tbh.
Still waiting for a number, david kimbrell.
Except none of that is true at all.
Nice try though.
Who is David Kimbrell?
Did you ever figure out what a straw man is?
So still not giving us a number, huh david kimbrell? That's too bad.
Who is David Kimbrell?
And have you figured out what a straw man is yet?
Deny deny deny
No really. It was a Myspace page! I'm just talking about it now because my life was in danger back then and I was acting like a black man!
Saw this had gone a few more pages since I last read and expected some interesting developments in the story. I see it's just chumpdumper talking about anything but the OP.
Schizophrenic is hearing things and making up quotes lol. I know what I saw and it's the truth, David kimbrell is a big Austin Toros fan take that for what it's worth.
What's so hard about giving us a number, david?
Chumpy could entertain his own sub-forum
Thoughts and prayers to the deceased and their families.
But how is attacking a hostile military installation "terrorism"? Do you know how many innocent people are killed each year by drones in Arab countries? How are flying bomb dropping robots not "terrorism"?
The USS Cole was docked in a Yemeni port, a legitimate target (imagine if an Iranian battleship was refueling in Galveston) yet it is deemed "terrorism"?
The word has no meaning other than "violence by Muslims against the West".
The word is hard to define down. Some might argue that, because the shooter did not wear military markings and isn't part of a unit, it could be considered "terrorism" as it was an attack based on political leanings. Of course, there's probably a ton of those kinds of attacks in US all the time... it's just that the person's name isn't Arabic so.. .*shrug*
good point. Terrorism is commonly meant to be violence against, intimidation of non-military, like USA bombing Nagasaki and Hiroshima, or fire-bombing Dresden.
Even if this guy were not official military, attacking against US military aggressors would qualify him as combatant.
10Ks of non military in Iraq and Afghanistan have been attacking US and other military invaders for years. US invaders call them terrorists to denigrate them, but they are engaging in military warfare against state military, not terrorism.
Does anybody here actually care about innocent people you know...dying? Or is it a rush to the keyboard to start the e-arguments?
No defense. SupremeGuy's arguing tactics are just really childish. He's an imbecile clanging away at keyboard. Clearly not an intelligent man. Do you think Supremeguy's aruguments are intelligent?
There's more than that needed to be defined as a lawful combatant. You have to bear arms openly, wear uniforms, etc https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combatant
"lawful" ?
Anybody taking up arms to fight an UNlawful invader is a combatant.
Of course, the unlawful invader will consider such combatants "unprivileged", eg, lock them in GITMO for many years without trial or charge, submit them to torture and degradation, breaking all the laws of "legal" warfare, reinforcing the unlawful invader/jail-keep as insanely, sadisticly unlawful.
Military people sign up to kill or be killed. This week's combatant realized those guys' sign up risks.
I expect this week's attack to be used by NSA/CIA/FBI/militarized-police-surveillance-state to screw Americans out fo the Cons utional rights even more. In that sense, this week's "combatant", like OBL did, managed to kill much more than a few "privileged" combatants.
You ing idiot. That guy was a terrorist. Plain and simple."lawful" ?
Anybody taking up arms to fight an UNlawful invader is a combatant.
Of course, the unlawful invader will consider such combatants "unprivileged", eg, lock them in GITMO for many years without trial or charge, submit them to torture and degradation, breaking all the laws of "legal" warfare, reinforcing the unlawful invader/jail-keep as insanely, sadisticly unlawful.
Military people sign up to kill or be killed. This week's combatant realized those guys' sign up risks.
I expect this week's attack to be used by NSA/CIA/FBI/militarized-police-surveillance-state to screw Americans out fo the Cons utional rights even more. In that sense, this week's "combatant", like OBL did, managed to kill much more than a few "privileged" combatants.
Dumpster derails every thread that doesn't fit the lib agenda.
Military people sign up to kill or be killed in war. Were these recruiters fighting a war on US soil?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
