It's sickening to know boutons takes pleasure in these Marines deaths
To an extent I do. Otherwise second guessing the US military makes you a hypocrite. There is no warmongers without soldiers...... Soldiers that enlisted freely
The US military targets recruitment and training centers all the time, and openly brags about the "success". The pilots of those drones sit in Nevada. Sucks when it happens to us, but it was an act of war and he is/was an enemy combatant, not a terrorist. He didn't go shoot up a school or a mall.
Bull . He shot up a bunch of unarmed people. Terrorism.
He has an arguement?
I've decided to buy a gun now and I've never owned a gun in my entire life.
1993 was the year to panic buy a gun.
That was the modern peak of gun related homicides. Pretty much downhill ever since.
You lived through that horror show. What has made you want to buy a gun now that the gun related homicide rate is about 40% lower?
Terrorists.
the NRA/GOA/gun-industry/tea-bagger/OathKeeper/paranoia propaganda is 400% more intense.
So gun homicides are declining even though the Second Amendment still exists and people still own guns? Thanks for proving that gun control is both unnecessary and more about the "control" part than the "gun" part, David.![]()
You think you are a terrorist target?
It also went to that peak when the 2nd Amendment existed and people owned guns. Congratulations, you proved nothing.
Strangely enough, the assault weapons ban was introduced in 1994.
And who is this David you keep mentioning? You look really stupid using that name since it isn't my name.
Don't know. Just want to give myself a chance if so.
The assault weapons ban expired in 2004, yet gun homicides are still declining without it, David. If draconian gun control was necessary, you'd think the number of gun homicides would keep soaring higher and higher as long as the Second Amendment and personal gun ownership are in place.
But the murder rate did soar when the 2nd amendment was in effect and people owned guns, David.
What happened then, David?
Not according to the US government: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/22/2656f
the term “terrorism” means premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents;
Good luck!
![]()
It's also steadily declined under those same conditions, David. It's almost as if blaming things on an inanimate object is re ed.
As re ed as crediting them, David.
Unarmed means non-combatant.
No it doesn't![]()
Not any different when an overseas base is attacked.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)