Reply With Quote
I know you won't so I won't bother.
But I'm not making comments to the effect that I won't. I will, and you guys are terrified.
I know you won't so I won't bother.
Well until you're actually there, you're not there. No reason to believe you'll show up.
and nobody is terrified of you. There's just no payoff here to meet up, whether it's to fight or to have beers.
You're a strange dude that I have zero interest in ever meeting.
Cmon cuck put up your dukes etc etc
Why do you use it as one, David? Do you think your fellow SJWs would approve of that?
Once Dumpster started ting up the thread with his 500 Questions schtick, it's not like any real discussion of the topic was going to happen anyway.
who's David?
Why wouldn't he use it as one? Do you think SJW's wouldn't approve of it?
I'm waiting
Do you take it as an insult, David?
You derailedPERIOD
Stop dodging the question. Why do you use gay accusations with the intent to insult?
Why would I consider it an insult? I don't think there is anything wrong with someone's being gay.
So then why do you clearly use it as an insult, David? I don't care what you consider it to be, I'm just asking about your use of it.
If I don't consider it an insult and you don't consider it an insult, what's the problem, David?
Once again, you're dodging the question, David. "Consider" has nothing to do with it. Why do you use it as an insult?
How can I use it as an insult if no one finds it insulting, David?
I simply notice when a man takes an unusual amount of interest in another man, like you do with me. If that means you are gay, more power to you.
Just because your schtick doesn't work on anyone doesn't change the intent, David.
How progressive of you, David.I simply notice when a man takes an unusual amount of interest in another man, like you do with me. If that means you are gay, more power to you.
Looks like it's working quite well, David.
It's OK if you're gay, David. It would actually explain your interest in many men.How progressive of you, David.
Last edited by ChumpDumper; 07-20-2015 at 06:09 PM.
David?.....we don't need no stinkin' Davids!
All this question-dodging has got you flustered, David. You're quite bad at spelling when you're flustered.
I'm straight, David.It's OK if you're gay, David. It would actually explain your interest in many men.
Already edited, David.
Don't get defensive, David. It's really no problem at all if you are gay.I'm straight, David.
You're rattled enough to have to edit your posts, David. Very out-of-character.
Not defensive at all, David. "Defensive" is how you act when referred to as David. Why is that?Don't get defensive, David. It's really no problem at all if you are gay.
I make typos all the time, David.
Of course you're being defensive, David. Don't worry so much about people thinking you are gay.Not defensive at all, David. "Defensive" is how you act when referred to as David. Why is that?
Not defensive at all. Have you caught on yet to the fact that you are still the only one who gets angry and defensive about being called David, David? Why is that?
What would you call being defensive, David?
I would say asking "who's David?" every time you're called David, followed by making up a new schtick where you call everyone David (and notice how nobody reacts to it except for you) would qualify as being "defensive," David.
I still don't know who David is, David. You were always too afraid to answer when I asked you that direct question.You react to it by calling me David, David. Don't get defensive about reacting to me. That alone doesn't make me think you are gay.followed by making up a new schtick where you call everyone David (and notice how nobody reacts to it except for you) would qualify as being "defensive," David.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
