Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 105
  1. #1
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    from a newsletter:

    Instead of listening to American consumers, the U.S. House of Representatives just

    passed the DARK Act, a bill that would

    overturn state genetically engineered (GE) food labeling laws,

    block FDA from ever implementing mandatory GE food labeling, and

    allow food companies to continue to make misleading “natural” claims for foods that contain GE ingredients.


  2. #2
    Board Man Comes Home Clipper Nation's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Clippers
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Post Count
    54,257
    But, but, BigGov's regulating our food, right? It must be all good!

  3. #3
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    from a newsletter:

    Instead of listening to American consumers, the U.S. House of Representatives just

    passed the DARK Act, a bill that would

    overturn state genetically engineered (GE) food labeling laws,

    block FDA from ever implementing mandatory GE food labeling, and

    allow food companies to continue to make misleading “natural” claims for foods that contain GE ingredients.

    I see you are ting again Shazbot.

    No link means it's another Alter article. Right?

  4. #4
    Rum and Coke SupremeGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Post Count
    10,795
    WC pushed bouton's in so hard in the that other thread that he's not posting links to his own ty articles anymore?

  5. #5
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    Wow...

    Shazbot is correct in that HR 1599 passed.

    http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2015/roll462.xml

    Here is the text:

    https://www.congress.gov/114/bills/h...14hr1599rh.pdf

  6. #6
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    WC pushed bouton's in so hard in the that other thread that he's not posting links to his own ty articles anymore?
    It bugs the out of me that he, and others, are quick to post what they read in some activist rag, and don't provide any material to source check.

    I'm sorry. What good is an article if they don't provide proper sources?

  7. #7
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    42,561
    Using Big( you're against) and "for profit" -- signs of lib dementia

  8. #8
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    At the same time the bill says there can be no state requirements to label GMO foots that are of interstate commerce, starting on page 15 are standards and provisions for labeling foods that are not GMO.

  9. #9
    Garnett > Duncan sickdsm's Avatar
    My Team
    Minnesota T'Wolves
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Post Count
    4,098
    At the same time the bill says there can be no state requirements to label GMO foots that are of interstate commerce, starting on page 15 are standards and provisions for labeling foods that are not GMO.
    Science tells us there is no harm from GMO foods. Requiring labeling would be akin to making all gay nba players wear a rainbow uniform.

  10. #10
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,881
    LOL as if man hasn't been doing genetic engineering on food for 30,000 years. Almost all the we eat is man-made, except it was done through selective breeding.

  11. #11
    my unders, my frgn whites pgardn's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Post Count
    39,469
    Actually there is some pretty awful stuff used to increase the shelf life of foods.
    Unfortunately Boots overextends the argument thereby ruining the legit stuff.

  12. #12
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    GMO technology isn't a strategy to make higher quality crops, more nutritious, cheaper, etc, etc.

    GMO enslaves farmers world-wide to BigAg, BigChem, forced to buy patented seeds and using Ms tons of corresponding x-icides, forever.

    glyphosate has sterilized, poisoned the soil and water.

    People want their BigFood 's contents exposed, they don't want mystery food, mystery chemicals, so Repug s make a FEDERAL REGULATION as they are paid to do that blocks states, FREEDOM!, from passing labelling regulations.

  13. #13
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    LOL as if man hasn't been doing genetic engineering on food for 30,000 years. Almost all the we eat is man-made, except it was done through selective breeding.
    BigChem, BigFood, BigAg and genetic engineering are for more profits, "rentier agriculture", NOT for improved, more nutritious, more productive crops, which was, is the objective of traditional plant, animal breeding.

  14. #14
    my unders, my frgn whites pgardn's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Post Count
    39,469
    GMO technology isn't a strategy to make higher quality crops, more nutritious, cheaper, etc, etc.

    GMO enslaves farmers world-wide to BigAg, BigChem, forced to buy patented seeds and using Ms tons of corresponding x-icides, forever.

    glyphosate has sterilized, poisoned the soil and water.

    People want their BigFood 's contents exposed, they don't want mystery food, mystery chemicals, so Repug s make a FEDERAL REGULATION as they are paid to do that blocks states, FREEDOM!, from passing labelling regulations.
    So all GMO is bad?

  15. #15
    Believe. Blizzardwizard's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Post Count
    4,303
    All GMO food should be labelled. But all the BigCorp and their BS will make sure that doesn't happen.

  16. #16
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    So all GMO is bad?
    Still waiting for your proof that Vit A from your beloved GMO rice is bioavailable and gets into blood circulation.

    GMO cannot be evaluated as food alone(it's NOTHING SPECIAL, even inferior to organic), but only in the context of the for-profit, polluting, poisoning industrial system that produces it.

    If GMO is so wonderful, why isn't it advertized on packaging labels?

  17. #17
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    USDA Moves to Approve "Agent Orange" GMO Seeds


    http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/2...ange-gmo-seeds

  18. #18
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    LOL as if man hasn't been doing genetic engineering on food for 30,000 years. Almost all the we eat is man-made, except it was done through selective breeding.
    Genetic manipulation is far different than hybrids of genetics. It's perfectly understandable for concerns.

  19. #19
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    GMO technology isn't a strategy to make higher quality crops, more nutritious, cheaper, etc, etc.

    GMO enslaves farmers world-wide to BigAg, BigChem, forced to buy patented seeds and using Ms tons of corresponding x-icides, forever.

    glyphosate has sterilized, poisoned the soil and water.

    People want their BigFood 's contents exposed, they don't want mystery food, mystery chemicals, so Repug s make a FEDERAL REGULATION as they are paid to do that blocks states, FREEDOM!, from passing labelling regulations.
    Can you tell me how many good innovations have come about when there was not a profit motive?

  20. #20
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    Can you tell me how many good innovations have come about when there was not a profit motive?
    I dunno. But you, Expert Mind Reader through the millenia, reveal to us the motivations of people who advanced civilization.

  21. #21
    Garnett > Duncan sickdsm's Avatar
    My Team
    Minnesota T'Wolves
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Post Count
    4,098
    Gmos are mainly designed to be resistant to weeds, diseases and insects. Quit pretending you know anything about anything.

    Roundup breaks down in sunlight and soil. Funny how you say it's sterilizing the soil. Are you referring to raising the salinity? In that case home diy remedies of vinegar etc are much worse for salt levels. Do you care to explain that ?

  22. #22
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    Gmos are mainly designed to be resistant to weeds, diseases and insects. Quit pretending you know anything about anything.
    how naive. GMOs enslave agriculture to perennial purchases of GMO seed and corresponding x-icides.

    BigChem LIES that glyphosate breaks down "quickly". You could look up the truth. "glyphosate doesn't break down"

  23. #23
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    42,561
    Anti-GMO is akin to being anti-vaxer

    Why does boutons want 3rd world kids to die?

  24. #24
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    "Anti-GMO is akin to being anti-vaxer"

    You Lie. akin only your rightwingnut "logic"

    "Why does boutons want 3rd world kids to die?"

    You Lie

  25. #25
    Board Man Comes Home Clipper Nation's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Clippers
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Post Count
    54,257
    All GMO food should be labelled. But all the BigCorp and their BS will make sure that doesn't happen.
    Why should private businesses be forced at gunpoint by BigGov to put labels on their products to soothe your irrational anti-scientific fear of GMOs?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •