Reply With Quote
they're in the same class of player. they're both above average, neither are elite. one guy being slightly better or worse than the other doesn't change my overlying pointYou're kind of responding to yourself, tbh.
You're kind of responding to yourself, tbh.
they're in the same class of player. they're both above average, neither are elite. one guy being slightly better or worse than the other doesn't change my overlying pointYou're kind of responding to yourself, tbh.
Game manager 0-7 when his defense gives up 24+ points
To be fair, Newton is 4-27-1 when his defense gives up 21+ points
Game manager 0-7 when his defense gives up 24+ points
Goddamn, didn't realize Cam has had to carry the team so long. ing defense giving up 21 points thirty two times in his careerTo be fair, Newton is 4-27-1 when his defense gives up 21+ points
ing got ass game manager gets his defense to carry him every game
The Seahawks owe everything to Wilson. They never won without him. Pay the man.
Carrying his team to a horrendous record
Meanwhile, Derek Anderson is 5-20 when his defense gives up 21+ points. Not great, but a lot better than . As usual, it's obvious who deserves to be starting in Carolina.
What is your obsession with male ejaculate? Another cali ?
Cam being on a team who in 75%+ of his games have given up more than 21 points speaks to how much pressure has been on him to come from behind. ing disgraceful by our FO to put him into this position until now. Of course the one year he has a top 10 defense he goes 12-4. But I guess when you take over a 2-14 team, that's what happens.
The fact that this gotesque game manager in his entire career has never had to deal with but 7 times his team giving up more than 3.5 scores, and every single time it's happened he's failed to do anything, should end any discussion of elite right here right now.
http://espn.go.com/nfl/boxscore?gameId=400554385
Game manager 0-7 when his defense gives up 24+ points
http://espn.go.com/nfl/boxscore?gameId=331103026
24+ means >24
Trying to defend game managers shame with the raiders and bucs as evidence
lol no24+ means >24
Trying to defend game managers shame with the raiders and bucs as evidence
you can correct yourself and move on, though
bucs and raiders, two dumpster fires
"but-but-but 24 is wrong u cant take that away from game manager"
Seahawks could get Matt Ryan, Joe Flacco, Drew Brees and load of picks for Struggle. Why they dont call these teams?
No he's not, that's why when the players picked their top 100 players for 2014 Flacco was way back there, while Wilson was the 5th QB.
Dummy, do you understand career stats at all?
Dude, do you understand the game at all? You come off about as dumb as rock. Russell Wilson is just a...THIRD YEAR QB...ok stupid? So you compare him to others after their...THRD YEAR...ok dummy? You don't compare a third year QB to a seasoned vet with 10 or more seasons ok? Do you get that at all?
Clipper Nation I challenge your dumb ass to show me another....THIRD YEAR..QB who compares to RW when it comes to stats/wins/SB;s....ok? Come on got who had a better.....THREE SEASONS. Well?
All of Wilsons first three year stats are superior to Flaccos.
Then there's this...
Flacco TD/INT...60/34
Wilson TD/INT...66/26
I know I know, you;re too stupid to figure that out.
Last edited by Avante; 07-28-2015 at 04:02 AM.
No they couldn't.
If they could, they'd already be on the phone...
All of those teams would laugh and hang up the phone.
My sources tell me that now that he's not getting it at home Russell needs the pay raise to keep up with his projected road budget for the coming season.
doubt they could get any of them, except perhaps brees
So Wilson for Ryan straight up would make Atlanta laugh ? If so, why Seattle offers him 21 mil $, if they couldnt trade him for QB like Ryan.
Why would Atlanta downgrade at the QB position?
As for the Seahawks, the only reason to give him that kind of money is fear of the unknown.
Oh , there`s only 3 years diffrence between them. I though there is 5 years, so Ryan is not an option. But Brees ? For 2 years with picks.
Why would New Orleans downgrade at the QB position?
They wont win with Brees. Rebuild, starting with QB.
They would just end up overpaying game manager. Game Manager + Awful New Orleans D, would spell disaster as he's failed everytime so far he's had to bail out a rare bad defensive showing. With such a huge clog in capspace, Saints would be in the cellar for years.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
