Reply With Quote
It looks like he's been hanging around like territorial pissing will make a difference since I've been gone. I like how he says he's been at work for 11 hours too. He was arguing with Winehole 11 hours ago.
That's exactly what a pussy would do and did do. Especially considering you know the answer.
It looks like he's been hanging around like territorial pissing will make a difference since I've been gone. I like how he says he's been at work for 11 hours too. He was arguing with Winehole 11 hours ago.
The internet lawyer who's never won an argument.
Slurper is a weird dude. It's like he wants to have an internet fight about who's a pussy rather than discuss what he found ...
What I found was posted in this thread. So, I'll asK again, but rephrase my question as you seem to be struggling. If a judge deems evidence inadmissible citing rape shield law, does the defense have any avenues to challenge the decision with relevant case law to cite as precedent?
so basically your sorry-ass excuse for "research" = reading through this thread
I didn't claim to do any research. I guess claiming I looked it up was a bit of a stretch, but it was a direct question.
i read it, somewhere.
So you plagiarized Fuzzy's post, then?
No. But I read what both he and ElNono posted.
yeah you are using the xmas routine now. lovely.
Really? Because according to you, I was "plagiarizing" when I looked something up to answer a question you asked. By your own logic, you just "plagiarized."
Seriously? Have a bit of intellectual honesty. You're turning into as ty a poster as Godor Xeer.
Oh . You don't know what plagiarizing is. Quote my post where I plagiarized what I'd read as you did when you started referencing Godord and Xeer.
Sure thing, Cleveland State Law School Award.
Ad hominemSure thing, Cleveland State Law School Award.
Go further upstream and read what ElNono posted.
So is calling me "Godord Xeer" for having the nerve to research the answer to a question.
Unfortunate the ass lawyer had to go to bed after 11 hrs of practicing law.
So we have one idiot who thinks law review articles are peer reviewed and another who thinks "looking something up" = reading this thread and calling someone a pussy for not doing legal research.
What a bunch of gots
Researching was fine. The fact that you neglected to cite your work was why you were deemed a plagiarist.So is calling me "Godord Xeer" for having the nerve to research the answer to a question.
What at was really funny was that as a libertarian, you couldn't reference a single successful libertarian society without googling to find the great societies of Godord and Xeer.
Are you going to answer my question or not, pussy?
So we have one idiot who thinks law review articles are peer reviewed and another who thinks "looking something up" = reading this thread and calling someone a pussy for not doing legal research.
What a bunch of gots
Sorry, I got better things to do than see you repost already in this thread, especially when I asked you to show us what you got for another.
Repost whatever from Nono and I'll look at it tomorrow,
Crofl slurper whining about attention like a female
Answer this basic question:
If a judge deems evidence inadmissible citing rape shield law, does the defense have any avenues to challenge the decision with relevant case law to cite as precedent?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
