Did I Stumble Upon Wild Cobra's Facebook?

[Blizzardwizard]

"Pro-choice" liberals would like doctors to have no choice in the services they provide in the case of abortion.

Doctors get paid quite a healthy salary to do their work and provide the abortions, so of course they should have to. You Libertarians though would force a women to keep a baby even if they can not pay for the baby's care, health insurance, education etc. And I'm guessing you wouldn't pay these struggling women even a dime to look after their child, despite the fact that it was YOU who forces them to keep the baby. After you make them keep the baby, they'll be forced to ask the government for money but you won't give them any because 'the government shouldn't interfere in healthcare '. This means the baby will likely die or be severely malnourished, and it'll be the the fat white Libertarian's sitting on their stacks of cash that'll blame the mother for the babies death, even though she didn't want the ing baby in the first place.

Libertarians, they'll make the government intervene when it suits them, but as soon as people need money due to the government's intervention they'll say' that, it's your problem now.'

[Splits]

The father is not legally allowed to have any say in the matter, despite being 50% responsible for the pregnancy, and isn't even required to be informed.

Your "facts" are indeed, not facts. It depends on what state you live in. Typical liber : lie to cover his hypocrisy.

It's a human beingPERIOD

It's not a human until it could live outside the wombPERIOD

http://www.nationalreview.com/articl...-carl-anderson

Sweet. I hope that's true. Women who don't earn enough and need taxpayer assistance should be able to access any legal medical procedure. Laws outlawing taxpayer funded abortion are draconian. I'm glad they've found a way around them.

"Pro-choice" liberals would like doctors to have no choice in the services they provide in the case of abortion.

The very few doctors left who provide a critical, legal, medical service to women live under constant threat. They are heroes.

[Clipper Nation]

Your "facts" are indeed, not facts. It depends on what state you live in. Typical liber : lie to cover his hypocrisy.

The Supreme Court has routinely ruled against men's right to choose. Planned Parenthood v. Danforth ruled that the father's consent isn't required, Planned Parenthood v. Casey ruled against the father needing to be informed. Pro-"choice" activist judges have made sure to rule any attempt at giving the father a say in the matter as uncons utional.

It's not a human until it could live outside the wombPERIOD

It isPERIOD

Sweet. I hope that's true. Women who don't earn enough and need taxpayer assistance should be able to access any legal medical procedure. Laws outlawing taxpayer funded abortion are draconian. I'm glad they've found a way around them.

More pro-"choice" hypocrisy. If I don't want to fund abortions, I shouldn't be forced to.

[Blizzardwizard]

More pro-"choice" hypocrisy. If I don't want to fund abortions, I shouldn't be forced to.

So you'll make thousands of women suffer just so you'll feel better?

The

+ Nice evasion of my previous post CN. You evade as much as your buddies BigCorp evade paying taxes.

[Clipper Nation]

So you'll make thousands of women suffer just so you'll feel better?

The

If you feel that strongly about it, then you should have no problem voluntarily donating money to abortion clinics and pro-"choice" organizations, right?

The irony of a movement that calls themselves pro-"choice" demanding that everyone should be forced to fund abortions is rich.

[Blizzardwizard]

Doctors get paid quite a healthy salary to do their work and provide the abortions, so of course they should have to. You Libertarians though would force a women to keep a baby even if they can not pay for the baby's care, health insurance, education etc. And I'm guessing you wouldn't pay these struggling women even a dime to look after their child, despite the fact that it was YOU who forces them to keep the baby. After you make them keep the baby, they'll be forced to ask the government for money but you won't give them any because 'the government shouldn't interfere in healthcare '. This means the baby will likely die or be severely malnourished, and it'll be the the fat white Libertarian's sitting on their stacks of cash that'll blame the mother for the babies death, even though she didn't want the ing baby in the first place.

Libertarians, they'll make the government intervene when it suits them, but as soon as people need money due to the government's intervention they'll say' that, it's your problem now.'

[Blizzardwizard]

If you feel that strongly about it, then you should have no problem voluntarily donating money to abortion clinics and pro-"choice" organizations, right?

The irony of a movement that calls themselves pro-"choice" demanding that everyone should be forced to fund abortions is rich.

Just like you are forcing people to keep their baby, and will have no problem shutting them down when they come looking for welfare + medicaid to keep said baby alive.

[Splits]

The Supreme Court has routinely ruled against men's right to choose. Planned Parenthood v. Danforth ruled that the father's consent isn't required, Planned Parenthood v. Casey ruled against the father needing to be informed. Pro-"choice" activist judges have made sure to rule any attempt at giving the father a say in the matter as uncons utional.

Which is the way it should be. Even the extremely right-wing Supreme court recognizes a woman's right to her own body. Yet if you live in Kentucky, Pennsylvania, or South Carolina you cannot get an abortion without spousal consent, defying the law of the land. And then you have got "cons utionalist" liber s are still trying to squirm their way around the cons ution because -shaming is so important to them.

It isPERIOD

Not according to 40 years of Cons utional interpretation. The Cons ution says cells are not humans until they can live outside the wombPERIOD.

More pro-"choice" hypocrisy. If I don't want to fund abortions, I shouldn't be forced to.

Then move. Or stop paying taxes. The Cons ution doesn't give the taxpayer line-item veto power. I hate Israel and don't want to fund that terrorist state, I shouldn't be forced to. I don't want to fund for-profit prisons, I shouldn't be forced to.

I don't want to fund X, I shouldn't be forced to and it is all the fault of lib s

[Splits]

The irony of a movement that calls themselves pro-"life" demanding that everyone should be forced to carry incest or rape babies is rich.

[Splits]

Just like you are forcing people to keep their baby, and will have no problem shutting them down when they come looking for welfare + medicaid to keep said baby alive.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Where you been Splits?

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...=251459&page=3

[Blizzardwizard]

I don't want to fund X, I shouldn't be forced to and it is all the fault of lib s

Why should I have to pay taxes to fund schools and hospitals, I've finished education and I'm not sick

[Splits]

Why should I have to pay taxes to fund schools and hospitals, I've finished education and I'm not sick

I got mine, you

Making fun of "libertarians" is so easy it's comical

[Clipper Nation]

Which is the way it should be. Even the extremely right-wing Supreme court recognizes a woman's right to her own body. Yet if you live in Kentucky, Pennsylvania, or South Carolina you cannot get an abortion without spousal consent, defying the law of the land. And then you have got "cons utionalist" liber s are still trying to squirm their way around the cons ution because -shaming is so important to them.

"Extremely right-wing" Supreme Court
Pro-"choice," unless you're the father
Whining about " -shaming" while being a misandrist

The Cons ution says cells are not humans until they can live outside the wombPERIOD.

Which clause of the Cons ution says this?

I hate Israel and don't want to fund that terrorist state, I shouldn't be forced to. I don't want to fund for-profit prisons, I shouldn't be forced to.

Then move. Or stop paying taxes.

[Splits]

"Extremely right-wing" Supreme Court
Pro-"choice," unless you're the father

Roberts, an extreme right-wing authoritarian (who you should theoretically hate if you had an ounce of dignity or allegiance to "libertarianism") replaced a centrist in Rhenquist. Sam Alito, about as far to the right as you can get in any sense of the word, replaced a centrist in O'Connor. So yeah, the SC has never been further to the extreme right in my lifetime.

Which clause of the Cons ution says this?

Roe v. Wade

Then move. Or stop paying taxes.

The irony is that I have lived in 3 different European countries, all with lower taxes, and can move back at any time I wish because I have irreplaceable skills and speak 4 languages. Meanwhile, you're forever stuck in this hole country barely speaking 1 language

[Blizzardwizard]

The irony is that I have lived in 3 different European countries, all with lower taxes, and can move back at any time I wish because I have irreplaceable skills and speak 4 languages. Meanwhile, you're forever stuck in this hole country barely speaking 1 language

People call this place bad but I'd rather be here than the land of the free*

*does not include women wanting an abortion

[Spurminator]

The father is not legally allowed to have any say in the matter, despite being 50% responsible for the pregnancy, and isn't even required to be informed.

There you have it, folks, releasing sperm is exactly the same as being pregnant for 40 weeks. #MensRights

[Wild Cobra]

The father is not legally allowed to have any say in the matter, despite being 50% responsible for the pregnancy, and isn't even required to be informed.

Since this ist the case, the father shouldn't have to pay child support either.

[Clipper Nation]

Roe v. Wade

...is not a clause of the Cons ution, you re .

The irony is that I have lived in 3 different European countries, all with lower taxes, and can move back at any time I wish because I have irreplaceable skills and speak 4 languages.

And you still illegally immigrated here - that just says it all

[SocialJusticeWarrior]

I got mine, you

Making fun of "libertarians" is so easy it's comical

I agree. I'm en led to theirs, them!

[SocialJusticeWarrior]

His ilk think of women as lesser beings, that are to be used and controlled by their superiors (him). -shaming is a very effective way to "keep them in their place".

Right on! Disagreeing with us means you hate women!

[Splits]

...is not a clause of the Cons ution, you re .


And you still illegally immigrated here - that just says it all

SCOTUS interpretation is law of the land, re .

Why do you just makeup bull and laugh at it? Do you find illegal immigration so funny that accusing random rich white guys of it is comical?

[SocialJusticeWarrior]

random rich white guys

You're a rich white guy? Why do you hate women and the poor so much, you misogynist s ?

[playjimmer]

"Only 20% behind"
Despite being propped up by BigUnion, he's still getting BTFO by the least likeable presidential candidate in our lifetime.

And it is more of because of how bad hillary has done than anything else.

[Splits]

You're a rich white guy? Why do you hate women and the poor so much, you misogynist s ?

I donate 25% of my earnings to charity and volunteer at a battered woman's shelter on the weekends, got.