The child isn't born yet, and the mother is ultimately making the decision to bring it into a world where the father doesn't want it.
Why penalize the child who is born just because the father doesn't wanna? The father took the risk, not the child.
The child isn't born yet, and the mother is ultimately making the decision to bring it into a world where the father doesn't want it.
the mother took a risk too. and if she knows she wont be able to be supported by the father, she can make her decision on how to proceed.
So, why penalize the child who is born just because the father doesn't wanna? The father took the risk, not the child.
The child isn't born yet.
But the ones who are born after that are penalized because the father doesn't wanna. Why penalize the child who is born just because the father doesn't wanna? The father took the risk, not the child.
this is why options such as adoption and termination exist
And it's why child support exists.
and some people here dont think the current policy is the best way to go about it
There's nothing stopping them from thinking that.
Right. This is a forum of discussion. And we are discussing our views.
Groundbreaking stuff.
Yep. I haven't seen anything to change my mind tho. Education will help more than effectively eliminating all male responsibility for unplanned children.
I don't think those options are mutually exclusive. Do you?
I said one option is good and the other is not good. the one that is not good should be excluded.
Such a shame your mother didn't exercise her inalienable right with the latter.
https://www.facebook.com/TheYoungTur...3468349284205/
so now sweden's liberal party is pushing this "male abortion" idea we were discussing here, with the man having a choice to "opt out" within the first 18 weeks. i dont like tyt for obvious reasons (the fact that they actually chose THAT name for their channel is pretty disgusting), but saw it posted on a friends feed and gave it a look
naturally if swedish liberals want to do it (and many liberals look to sweden as a shining beacon of liberalism at work), these ers agree wholeheartedly.... they do make a valid point that sweden does a better job supporting single parents and putting them in a position to raise a kid. though i think its a safe wager that if an american repulican originally pitched this idea, tyt would flip out and call them fascist mysogynists, etc
Say what you will, but I totally want to opt out of the baby I put inside Anahit.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)