Page 14 of 14 FirstFirst ... 41011121314
Results 326 to 343 of 343
  1. #326
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,417
    To your last part yes, agreed. If the man has no say in the baby's life in either scenario...he wants/she doesn't or she wants/he doesn't, the man should at least have an option to bear no financial responsibility in the latter case. The woman is aware the baby is not wanted by the father, she can continue with the pregnancy and take sole responsibility. It makes no sense how it is now. The father wants it? Too ing bad she is aborting. The father doesn't want it? Too ing bad he's paying for it.
    Why penalize the child who is born just because the father doesn't wanna? The father took the risk, not the child.

  2. #327
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ TheSanityAnnex's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    21,376
    Why penalize the child who is born just because the father doesn't wanna? The father took the risk, not the child.
    The child isn't born yet, and the mother is ultimately making the decision to bring it into a world where the father doesn't want it.

  3. #328
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    Why penalize the child who is born just because the father doesn't wanna? The father took the risk, not the child.
    the mother took a risk too. and if she knows she wont be able to be supported by the father, she can make her decision on how to proceed.

  4. #329
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,417
    The child isn't born yet, and the mother is ultimately making the decision to bring it into a world where the father doesn't want it.
    So, why penalize the child who is born just because the father doesn't wanna? The father took the risk, not the child.

  5. #330
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ TheSanityAnnex's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    21,376
    So, why penalize the child who is born just because the father doesn't wanna? The father took the risk, not the child.
    The child isn't born yet.

  6. #331
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,417
    The child isn't born yet.
    But the ones who are born after that are penalized because the father doesn't wanna. Why penalize the child who is born just because the father doesn't wanna? The father took the risk, not the child.

  7. #332
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    this is why options such as adoption and termination exist

  8. #333
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,417
    this is why options such as adoption and termination exist
    And it's why child support exists.

  9. #334
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    And it's why child support exists.
    and some people here dont think the current policy is the best way to go about it

  10. #335
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,417
    and some people here dont think the current policy is the best way to go about it
    There's nothing stopping them from thinking that.

  11. #336
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    There's nothing stopping them from thinking that.
    Right. This is a forum of discussion. And we are discussing our views.

    Groundbreaking stuff.

  12. #337
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,417
    Right. This is a forum of discussion. And we are discussing our views.

    Groundbreaking stuff.
    Yep. I haven't seen anything to change my mind tho. Education will help more than effectively eliminating all male responsibility for unplanned children.

  13. #338
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    Yep. I haven't seen anything to change my mind tho. Education will help more than effectively eliminating all male responsibility for unplanned children.
    I don't think those options are mutually exclusive. Do you?

  14. #339
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,417
    I don't think those options are mutually exclusive. Do you?
    I said one option is good and the other is not good. the one that is not good should be excluded.

  15. #340
    Grab 'em by the pussy Splits's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Post Count
    26,183
    this is why options such as adoption and termination exist
    Such a shame your mother didn't exercise her inalienable right with the latter.

  16. #341
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    So did the woman.

    If she wants to have the child, fine.

    Holding the man strictly liable for sticking his in a woman doesn't strike me as a great stride in the direction of gender equality.
    https://www.facebook.com/TheYoungTur...3468349284205/

    so now sweden's liberal party is pushing this "male abortion" idea we were discussing here, with the man having a choice to "opt out" within the first 18 weeks. i dont like tyt for obvious reasons (the fact that they actually chose THAT name for their channel is pretty disgusting), but saw it posted on a friends feed and gave it a look

    naturally if swedish liberals want to do it (and many liberals look to sweden as a shining beacon of liberalism at work), these ers agree wholeheartedly .... they do make a valid point that sweden does a better job supporting single parents and putting them in a position to raise a kid. though i think its a safe wager that if an american repulican originally pitched this idea, tyt would flip out and call them fascist mysogynists, etc

  17. #342
    Veteran vy65's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    8,916
    Say what you will, but I totally want to opt out of the baby I put inside Anahit.

  18. #343
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    Say what you will, but I totally want to opt out of the baby I put inside Anahit.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •