Parker excited for 'last crack' at championship

[AFBlue]

This AFBLUE guy that nobody fuking knows and is an irrelevant gook has been constantly calling people idiot without addressing the arguments or even making an argument

Respect
Be nice

You've also made the statement multiple times that you wish Parker would end up with a serious injury. The implication is that a Parker-less team is more compe ive for a le than a team with Parker. If you honestly believe that then there's no helping you. Because that's just not an intelligent take tbqh.

[spurraider21]

So I ask you then, Knowing that player A is detrimental mainly because of his ego..Do you continue supporting him as a starter with huge offensive role? Answer with a Yes or No.

whether you like him or not, he's on the team. his contract makes him untradeable. so i think it's in our best interest for him to just play better. we saw Tim reinvent his game when he started to look done against Phoenix in '10 and Memphis in '11. i hope TP can do the same... i'm not confident, not many players can do what Tim did, but he's going to be playing, so we just have to hope he's able to adjust his game. his jumper has improved (hit over 40% of his threes last year) so hopefully he focuses on that even more and learns to play off the ball more on offense.

many dumbasses here think Parker deserve more than that because he won us rings......Forget about his last two seasons...

I'm all for parker playing tbh. I just want to make sure he plays a role, but do you really think he will? Most likely no..

So if he's going to come back being detrimental again, I don't see why wishing not to see him on the court is a bad thing.

we need him to play well. we aren't going to win with mills or mccallum starting. the fact of the matter is he's untradeable and he's the only point guard that we can trust to handle the ball and try to get the offense set.

[apalisoc_9]

Not an intelligent take..



All advanced numbers suggest Parker is detrimental to the team.

you can't even come up with a legit argument outside the typical Vanilla Mainstream..Respect, PPG, Won us rings arguments

The Spurs were far more compe ive last with Parker out. The stats prove it.

Also this..

[apalisoc_9]

whether you like him or not, he's on the team. his contract makes him untradeable. so i think it's in our best interest for him to just play better. we saw Tim reinvent his game when he started to look done against Phoenix in '10 and Memphis in '11. i hope TP can do the same... i'm not confident, not many players can do what Tim did, but he's going to be playing, so we just have to hope he's able to adjust his game. his jumper has improved (hit over 40% of his threes last year) so hopefully he focuses on that even more and learns to play off the ball more on offense.


we need him to play well. we aren't going to win with mills or mccallum starting. the fact of the matter is he's untradeable and he's the only point guard that we can trust to handle the ball and try to get the offense set.

The idea that it's all dark and Gloom without Parker has absolutely no statistical or game by game evidence.

The spurs are at best if Parker hit shots and plays within the system, but they're also a terrible team with him trying to much and this is something that happens a lot.

The fact that the spurs has to work around a Players current situation ( terrible player in parker and contract) is something fans should be pissed about.

The spurs did the same with Jefferson the first two years..We all know he sucked but he had a huge contract so the spurs had to find ways to play him despite his tiness..the difference is that it was Ok to Wish for an Injury and Ok to insult the guy..In other words this place is full of hypocrites.

[ChumpDumper]

Great post.

[AFBlue]

Not an intelligent take..



All advanced numbers suggest Parker is detrimental to the team.

you can't even come up with a legit argument outside the typical Vanilla Mainstream..Respect, PPG, Won us rings arguments

The Spurs were far more compe ive last with Parker out. The stats prove it.

Also this..

You insinuate my takes are unsophisticated and then finish off your argument with highlights?

Also a single table reference, with suspect credibility tbqh, doesn't equate to "all advanced numbers" pointing to him being a detriment. Parker bested Mills who would be his primary replacement, even last year when Parker struggled, in PER, True Shooting %, Assist %, and Win Shares. So, you were saying that replacing Parker with a combination of Mills and Ray McCallum (whose advanced stats are far worse) would Be a net positive. Based on those comparative advanced stats, I don't see it. Your counter?

[Mikeanaro]

Not an intelligent take..



All advanced numbers suggest Parker is detrimental to the team.

you can't even come up with a legit argument outside the typical Vanilla Mainstream..Respect, PPG, Won us rings arguments

The Spurs were far more compe ive last with Parker out. The stats prove it.

Also this..

What about eye tests?

[apalisoc_9]

What about eye tests?

http://espn.go.com/nba/statistics/rp...e/3/position/1

tbh..Someone screenshot Patty ranking and Parker

[ChumpDumper]

Wishing injury on anyone is a move.

[apalisoc_9]

Every Spurs fan wished Injury to RJ when he was in a similar situation as Parker..

Hypocrites I say.

[ChumpDumper]

Every Spurs fan wished Injury to RJ when he was in a similar situation as Parker..

Hypocrites I say.

You're wrong.

And also a .

[Axegrinder]

Every Spurs fan wished Injury to RJ when he was in a similar situation as Parker..

Hypocrites I say.

Funny how all you playa hatin pussies always have to fall back on lies in your lame attempts at furthering your pussified agenda

[FkLA]

just not intelligent

"When Parker's been off the floor, the Spurs have an Offensive Rating of 105.4 and a Defensive Rating of 96.3, numbers that would trail only the Warriors. With Parker on the floor however, the Spurs are essentially the Sacramento Kings."



2014-2015 Tony Parker(age 32):

[Mikeanaro]

http://espn.go.com/nba/statistics/rp...e/3/position/1

tbh..Someone screenshot Patty ranking and Parker

They are not even in the same page, Patty #34 and Enrico Porker #74 thats low, most starters are in the first 30 spots.

[apalisoc_9]

just not intelligent

"When Parker's been off the floor, the Spurs have an Offensive Rating of 105.4 and a Defensive Rating of 96.3, numbers that would trail only the Warriors. With Parker on the floor however, the Spurs are essentially the Sacramento Kings."



2014-2015 Tony Parker(age 32):

but but Respect and narrative is more intelligent

[apalisoc_9]

just not intelligent

"When Parker's been off the floor, the Spurs have an Offensive Rating of 105.4 and a Defensive Rating of 96.3, numbers that would trail only the Warriors. With Parker on the floor however, the Spurs are essentially the Sacramento Kings."



2014-2015 Tony Parker(age 32):

but but Parker beats mills in every other advanced category.

[FkLA]

Nobody implied the question was about the big 3. People inferred because it directly followed a comment about Tim and Manu. The only reason you're overanalyzing is because of your agenda, which loses you all credibility among legitimate team fans.

And right before that he gave Aldridge a compliment. Point is the question and his answer was about next season and he called it a last crack w/o knowing if Timmy and Manu will retire. Even if they do, the teams has set itself up to be compe ive once the Big Two retire.

Simply put it's a chicken quote from a chicken player tbh.

[ChumpDumper]

And right before that he gave Aldridge a compliment. Point is the question and his answer was about next season and he called it a last crack w/o knowing if Timmy and Manu will retire. Even if they do, the teams has set itself up to be compe ive once the Big Two retire.

Simply put it's a chicken quote from a chicken player tbh.

lol you're so worked up about this.

[FkLA]

but but Respect and narrative is more intelligent

I wish I could find the tweet DPG21920 posted during the Clippers series. Basically had Enrique as having the worst negative impact out of any player during the playoffs. Paddy had one of the best.

[apalisoc_9]

I wish I could find the tweet DPG21920 posted during the Clippers series. Basically had Enrique as having the worst negative impact out of any player during the playoffs. Paddy had one of the best.

But but Parker beat Patty in almost every other category



yeah that's going to be tough to find, but it's probably somewhere in one of those game threads.

[Silver&Black]

As bad as it is to wish injury on a player...it's not near as bad as TDMVPDPOY (2ndGOATPF) saying that he doesn't want the Spurs to win the LOBT for the next few years. Even the die-hard Parker haters (FkLA, apalisoc, mike) wouldn't take it that far IMO. I can't imagine hating one player so much that it somehow outweighs the love I have for the other 12 guys.

"i would rather enrique remain at 4 for life..."
A "Spurs Fan" hoping that the Spurs don't ring next year
Some of our "Fans"

[dweaver99027]

This thread is case study in trolling the trolls. Golden!

[dabom]

Remember chump asked me about how much I thought parker weighted and how much I thought he should lose. Then he laughed at me. Good times.

[Mikeanaro]

As bad as it is to wish injury on a player...it's not near as bad as TDMVPDPOY (2ndGOATPF) saying that he doesn't want the Spurs to win the LOBT for the next few years. Even the die-hard Parker haters (FkLA, apalisoc, mike) wouldn't take it that far IMO. I can't imagine hating one player so much that it somehow outweighs the love I have for the other 12 guys.

"i would rather enrique remain at 4 for life..."
A "Spurs Fan" hoping that the Spurs don't ring next year
Some of our "Fans"

Agreed, I dont mind if Porker goes Humpty Dumpty but a championship is above any player love/hate for me.

[dabom]

Remember I said parker should be benched or play limited minutes in the playoffs or else get bounced while in december. Chump laughed again. Good times.