Reply With Quote
Hey Zimbabwe if you want him extradited why don't you charge him with a crime first?
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/n...abwe/30927415/"We want him tried in Zimbabwe because he violated our laws," Oppah Muchinguri, Zimbabwe's environment minister, said in a news conference Friday. Palmer's use of a crossbow and arrow to hunt Cecil violated Zimbabwe hunting regulations, according to reports.
Zimbabwe officials are appealing to U.S. authorities for help and have begun the extradition process, Muchinguri said.
Hey Zimbabwe if you want him extradited why don't you charge him with a crime first?
Apparently we have an extradition treaty with them.
Apparently Zimbabwe is having trouble charging him with an actual crime
so he's fully justified in killing the lion and skates free (you hope)
do you ever think before hitting reply? What would lead you to think I'd want him to skate free, because I like guns? You are so ing stupid sometimes.
I've said numerous times he's an asshole for killing the lion. If you'd actually take the time to read people's posts instead of constantly spamming you'd know this. The two guides are ed but if dentist said he was told it was all legal according to guides going to be really tough to charge dentist with a crime, which is why Zimbabwe hasn't charged him yet.
I think charges will be fairly simple to come up with, but I also think if the US finds some way to prosecute him, he won't be extradited.
So if someone told you murder is legal you could get away with it?
What a brilliant legal strategy!
Smh false ing equivalence
TheStupidityAnnex
It could be anything.
Pick a different offense if the murder example upsets you so.
Killing protected/owned animals is called poaching. It's not hard to come up with a crime.
It's funny that name is already taken.
Not sure why you're laughing. You're the dumb libcuck who put him on ignore because he hurt your fee-fees, but still lacks the self-control to not read every single one of his posts.
This dentist appears to be quite wealthy, so he'll hire, or some gun-fellatin/huntin org or fund raiser will hire, some very expensive legal eagle to kill the extradition or delay it FOR YEARS. Tie it up in the courts. Now, if ZW could have Interpol put out a arrest warrant, then his travelin days would be over. He'd be stuck killin USA wildlife.
btw, NPR has South African animal defense/anti-poaching guy on, he's been in that business for nearly 20 years. He said the big game hunting breaks down into two main sectors:"
1. the free roaming sector where the business proposal is 2 - 4 weeks riding around in the bush looking for a free roaming animal to kill. Guarantee is only about 60% success. People often don't have time or money for 2+ weeks, so ....
2. the "caged" shoot where you can pick out your victim on Internet, show up, and in few days, with 99% success rate, kill your animal. the animal is enclosed sometimes into increasingly smaller areas, and sometimes the final shoot is of a tightly penned animal.
this isn't the interview I heard, but has some numbers
http://www.npr.org/sections/parallel...g-game-hunting
Lmao . N!gger countries aren't real countries tbh.
Question. We're the tour guides charged?
No , that's why the two guides were already charged. If the dentist had no idea what he was doing was illegal because the guides misled him it's going to be really tough to charge him with a crime. Why do you think Zimbabwe hadn't charged him with a crime yet?
I see. It'll be difficult to prove he did it on purpose, since he had guides and they've already been charged. He obviously regrets what happened as he apologized for it. Sucks that the lion died but I find it difficult to hold the dentist accountable if he genuinely didn't know. I mean that's why he spent $55k on the hunt.
Ignorance to the law is not an excuse. Never has been and absolving him because he paid is repugnant. Good job!
Why have the guides been charged and not the dentist?
I read a report that the environment minister say that landowner didn't even have 1 quota for a lion this year but they did have a leopard permit. That they were trying to lure a leopard off the reserve but took the lion instead because it is easy for the client to say he shot it elsewhere. If that's true, unless this less coward can't tell the difference between the two, he most certainly violated the law.
Are you an expert on how the Zimbabwe legal system functions when charging non-citizen poachers who have fled the country? Or statute of limitations on charging a crime in Zimbabwe? You realize it's only been 5 days since they found out what happened? Do you have inside sources informing you that he has not been charged, or won't be?
Rofl do you really think the dentist won't be charged? Either here or there, he'll be charged somehow.
Oh look the got that failed by trying to argue conservation stats with 10+ year old data decided to chime in. He has not been charged, you don't need an inside source to figure that out.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
