Church of Trump

[ChumpDumper]

Getting attention... bringing attention to the fact that government's sub-6% number is a scam.

By saying one number then a completely different number?

How is that not a scam?

[DMX7]

By saying one number then a completely different number?

How is that not a scam?

Interpreting what he says requires some assumptions and you have to read what he said carefully. He first said the real unemployment rate is 21% (probably based on unemployment rate + projected amount people who have exited the work force). Then, he said 42% based on a chart he saw that was likely calculating the total number of people that could work (even if they didn't necessarily ever want to). In a great economy, maybe at least some of those people want to work.

When he makes America great again, those people who could work but don't want to now, may consider it.

[DMX7]

This man is thinking big. I love it!

[ChumpDumper]

Interpreting what he says requires some assumptions and you have to read what he said carefully. He first said the real unemployment rate is 21% (probably based on unemployment rate + projected amount people who have exited the work force). Then, he said 42% based on a chart he saw that was likely calculating the total number of people that could work (even if they didn't necessarily ever want to). In a great economy, maybe at least some of those people want to work.

When he makes America great again, those people who could work but don't want to now, may consider it.

Don’t forget in the meantime we have a real unemployment rate that’s probably 21%. It’s not 6. I’s not 5.2 and 5.5. Our real unemployment rate–in fact, I saw a chart the other day, our real unemployment–because you have ninety million people that aren’t working. Ninety-three million to be exact.

If you start adding it up, our real unemployment rate is 42%.

I read what he said carefully.

He said our real unemployment rate is 21%, then he said our real unemployment rate is 42%.

Which is it?

It can't be both.

[ChumpDumper]

This man is thinking big. I love it!

You're just trolling now.

[DMX7]

I read what he said carefully.

He said our real unemployment rate is 21%, then he said our real unemployment rate is 42%.

Which is it?

It can't be both.

You didn't read what I wrote carefully is the problem.

[ChumpDumper]

You didn't read what I wrote carefully is the problem.

You aren't Trump. I read Trump's words carefully.

All the sudden Trump is such a terrible communicator he needs online translators like you. I love it!

[DMX7]

You aren't Trump. I read Trump's words carefully.

All the sudden Trump is such a terrible communicator he needs online translators like you. I love it!

Maybe you're just a poor receiver of communication.

[DMX7]

And I'm dead serious about voting for this guy over Hillary. That's just me though, and I'm just one vote.

[ChumpDumper]

Maybe you're just a poor receiver of communication.

I'll have to have someone else translate that for me to understand

[DMX7]

I guess so, it's really not that complicated.

[ChumpDumper]

I'll have to have someone translate that too! This is your system!

[ChumpDumper]

Or maybe I'll jut take Trump at his actual words and not your attempt to spin them.

[DMX7]

What you said was just your spin.

What are his "actual words" to you?

[DMX7]

What you said was just your spin -- not a serious attempt to understand context and the clear differentiating reference to a "chart" that states "ninety million people that aren’t working".

[ChumpDumper]

What are his "actual words" to you?

Don’t forget in the meantime we have a real unemployment rate that’s probably 21%. It’s not 6. I’s not 5.2 and 5.5. Our real unemployment rate–in fact, I saw a chart the other day, our real unemployment–because you have ninety million people that aren’t working. Ninety-three million to be exact.

If you start adding it up, our real unemployment rate is 42%.

[DMX7]

What you said was just your spin -- not a serious attempt to understand context and the clear differentiating reference to a "chart" that states "ninety million people that aren’t working".

[ChumpDumper]

But I can just use your words too:

Ok, so I read the Time magazine article where he said the real unemployment rate is 21%... and then in the same breath, he said actual real unemployment rate was 42%.

Which is exactly what I said, but somehow your own words are no longer valid here either.

[DMX7]

But I can just use your words too:

You didn't use all of them -- maybe that's why you're not understanding.

[ChumpDumper]

You didn't use all of them -- maybe that's why you're not understanding.

Those are your words before you went into full spin mode and discredited yourself.

[DMX7]

^ that sounds like spin to me.

[ChumpDumper]

^ that sounds like spin to me.

Don’t forget in the meantime we have a real unemployment rate that’s probably 21%. It’s not 6. I’s not 5.2 and 5.5. Our real unemployment rate–in fact, I saw a chart the other day, our real unemployment–because you have ninety million people that aren’t working. Ninety-three million to be exact.

If you start adding it up, our real unemployment rate is 42%.

Ok, so I read the Time magazine article where he said the real unemployment rate is 21%... and then in the same breath, he said actual real unemployment rate was 42%.

Not sure where that came from but that's ok.

So again, this is all just for show. He knows exactly what he's doing.

I read what he said carefully.

He said our real unemployment rate is 21%, then he said our real unemployment rate is 42%.

Which is it?

It can't be both.

[DMX7]

Still didn't use them all -- that seems to be a continuing issue here.

[ChumpDumper]

Still didn't use them all -- that seems to be a continuing issue here.

I excluded all your ensuing spin.

Your not admitting it is spin is a continuing issue here.

[ChumpDumper]