oh look. A lawsuit filled in Kentucky against a county clerk for refusing to issue

[Blake]

It's not about picking nits a claim was made it was incorrect, I posted that it wasn't correct and had my claim challenged.

Because it's a big deal!

[DarrinS]

Eh.

He was quoting Cool Hand Luke

[RD2191]

OP's wife cheated on him for 2 years.

[Trainwreck2100]

Because it's a big deal!

Irrelevant

[apalisoc_9]

Meh, christinity has been on a demise in like forever. No on really practices the religion. Most if not all are sunday cherry picking church goers

Seriously..this hoe is an adulterer..just issue the damn papers.

[Blake]

Irrelevant

well yeah, the point is that your point is irrelevant. But hey, nothing stopping you from giving yourself a trophy for believing you won the internets.

[Blake]

OP's wife cheated on him for 2 years.

OP residing rent free

[RD2191]

Did your wife's lover pay rent for living in that pussy?

[Trainwreck2100]

well yeah, the point is that your point is irrelevant. But hey, nothing stopping you from giving yourself a trophy for believing you won the internets.

Based on what what my claim was made my claim was challenged and I defended it. You made a claim which I assume was sarcasm that it was a "big deal" but it's value is irrelevant

[Trainwreck2100]

well yeah, the point is that your point is irrelevant. But hey, nothing stopping you from giving yourself a trophy for believing you won the internets.

Based on what what my claim was made my claim was challenged and I defended it. You made a claim which I assume was sarcasm that it was a "big deal" but it's value is irrelevant

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Your statement was that the "supreme court doesn't put up with contempt of it's decision" this wasn't a supreme court case ergo the supreme court had nothing to do with it why is that so hard for you to understand.

So you think that the SCOTUS justices were not involved at all in a contempt lawsuit filed just days after their landmark case. The case was contempt of the SCOTUS decision. As I said before you are just ignorant to the process. Also you are fixating on minutiae. Bravo.

[Blake]

Based on what what my claim was made my claim was challenged and I defended it. You made a claim which I assume was sarcasm that it was a "big deal" but it's value is irrelevant

Wut

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Wut

What he says is important and what you say is irrelevant.

[Blake]

Did your wife's lover pay rent for living in that pussy?

Wow so you don't even care about the topic. You're going straight past it, coming right to me.

I must really make you really angry and must be taking up an awful lot of mental ram.

[RandomGuy]

Last time I checked, this woman is going to jail. Can we move on to more interesting news stories?

I certainly can join you in that wish. A tempest in a teacup. One person deciding not to do their job is not overly interesting, imo.

[RD2191]

Wow so you don't even care about the topic. You're going straight past it, coming right to me.

I must really make you really angry and must be taking up an awful lot of mental ram.

Lol. got.

[Clipper Nation]

Blakeold would start a thread praising it and referring to anyone who disagreed as "bigots" and "afraid of Muslims."

[Blake]

Lol. got.

rofl completely obsessed

[Blake]

Blakeold would start a thread praising it and referring to anyone who disagreed as "bigots" and "afraid of Muslims."

nope.

Lease free.

[Trainwreck2100]

So you think that the SCOTUS justices were not involved at all in a contempt lawsuit filed just days after their landmark case. The case was contempt of the SCOTUS decision. As I said before you are just ignorant to the process. Also you are fixating on minutiae. Bravo.

So now we're dealing in things that can't be confirmed or denied. OK

[Trainwreck2100]

Wut

You said I feel I "won internet" I don't why would I.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

So now we're dealing in things that can't be confirmed or denied. OK

Read the lower courts judgment. If you think they do not bring up the SCOTUS decision as the 400 lbs case law gorilla in the room then you are a fool. Again, SCOTUS's decision is the driving force as it was contempt of their judgment.

[Trainwreck2100]

Read the lower courts judgment. If you think they do not bring up the SCOTUS decision as the 400 lbs case law gorilla in the room then you are a fool. Again, SCOTUS's decision is the driving force as it was contempt of their judgment.

The lower court judgment aka the judgement she is in contempt over aka the reason she's in jail. Bolded has nothing to do with your original claim. Nobody is arguing SCOTuS's decision. You said the SCOTuS wouldn't put up with someone in contempt of their ruling. So what did SCOTuS do to punish this lady? Or is you answer they did it behind close doors under the table which can neither be confirmed or denied

[FuzzyLumpkins]

The lower court judgment aka the judgement she is in contempt over aka the reason she's in jail. Bolded has nothing to do with your original claim. Nobody is arguing SCOTuS's decision. You said the SCOTuS wouldn't put up with someone in contempt of their ruling. So what did SCOTuS do to punish this lady? Or is you answer they did it behind close doors under the table which can neither be confirmed or denied

What difference does it make? Chick was in contempt of the SCOTUS decision. The courts do not put up with that. You want to split hairs have at it. Missing the forest for a tree.

[Trainwreck2100]

What difference does it make? Chick was in contempt of the SCOTUS decision. The courts do not put up with that. You want to split hairs have at it. Missing the forest for a tree.

that's not what you said originally, you listed SCOTuS by name. How is that splitting hairs?