No they gave the Lakers that deal because of Kobe. Where's the clipper deal.... Same city. Winning 5 rings, going to 7 finals, capturing the heart and minds of the human pysche. Bottom line, you'll always cheer for second.
I think they would have had better offseasons if they wouldn't have signed him, hence the bad business decision.
Set the time to 2011 and irradiate us Mavs fans as well![]()
Which is what I said. It wasn't because Kobe is going to lead the Lakers to a championship. It's because be@ner and Pinoy player fan doesn't value wins over player love. You'd kill kittens for 2nd. You cannot even get top 20.
Business is about money, not winning in compe ion. Do you not understand the difference?
Under normal cir stances you win a le and the money follows. Except for the Spurs. Jim is such a lame ass invidual that even people from San Antonio are not aware when a le is won. In LA you see car flags... t-shirts... fans fans fans. While you guys only care about the meat being salty on your next Whataburger.
This is the lakers we are talking about not the knicks, they only care about seeing the lakers win, they don't give a rat's ass about kirby
I think Jim thought he was emulating his dad. He signed Magic to a big deal that gave him 10 percent shares of the team for building up the enterprise. I'm guessing the CBA no longer allowed that though; so, he had to take a salary cap hit. And let's be honest, this was a way to ensure tanking for picks.
I realize I'm dealing with people who have a superficial understanding of business and the NBA.
well check the tickets sold before and after and you'll see all you need to know.
Before and after what?
Your posting wouldn't still happen if you didn't exist, no. Though if you meant there would still be bitter, salty posters like you if you didn't exist, then yes obviously that's true. There are many like you.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)