29.4% against Latvia....

[YGWHI]

well you weren't exactly using them as stereotypes, more as facts...

Really? I posted "People call them..." "maybe, maybe not" I neve said "they're..."

[Budkin]

Will be nice to win it all again this year and see everyone come together at least for a couple days.

[FkLA]

Quit being an ass tbh

france has a long history to lose games against even easier opponent than Latvia, that's a French speciality, France lose this game without Parker. Watch the games next time you throw an opinion about a team you know about. Your comment about lakers ground is rich coming from a guy analyzing a game looking only at stat lines... You have 0 credibility whatsoever when talking about Parker and FNT.. I also find funny to see now that raw stat matter

So dramatic just to prop up Enrique. Didn't the French NT do pretty well last Summer without Enrique and with Boris leading the way?

but the team would fall apart and lose to POS teams like Latvia without Rique

Also like how you ignore the rest of the post. You are cherry picking a small, good stretch in an otherwise performance. You are the player fan.

Percentage is not considered raw stats.

[Brazil]

So dramatic just to prop up Enrique. Didn't the French NT do pretty well last Summer without Enrique and with Boris leading the way?

how do you know ? you did not watch any games of FNT last summer, like you did not watch any game of FNT eurobasket tbh

but the team would fall apart and lose to POS teams like Latvia without Rique

Parker has been FNT best player during this game... deal with it bro

Also like how you ignore the rest of the post. You are cherry picking a small, good stretch in an otherwise performance. You are the player fan.

the rest of your post is like your opinion about FNT

when a stat line has 10 - 15 items, picking one i.e less than 10% is cherry picking...

exactly what your krew like to do: Cherry picking, suppressing evidence, or the fallacy of incomplete evidence is the act of pointing to individual cases or data that seem to confirm a particular position, while ignoring a significant portion of related cases or data that may contradict that position. It is a kind of fallacy of selective attention, the most common example of which is theconfirmation bias.^[1][2]

[Brazil]

oh and I realize faltered is not a good thing but a cute one

maybe it's because mexican or something but as far as I know faltered is a cuttie of a word compared to terrible

[ChumpDumper]

Damn, I've never seen a group of people who expressly didn't watch a game comment on a game so much.

lol

[FkLA]

how do you know ? you did not watch any games of FNT last summer, like you did not watch any game of FNT eurobasket tbh





Parker has been FNT best player during this game... deal with it bro



the rest of your post is like your opinion about FNT

when a stat line has 10 - 15 items, picking one i.e less than 10% is cherry picking...

exactly what your krew like to do: Cherry picking, suppressing evidence, or the fallacy of incomplete evidence is the act of pointing to individual cases or data that seem to confirm a particular position, while ignoring a significant portion of related cases or data that may contradict that position. It is a kind of fallacy of selective attention, the most common example of which is theconfirmation bias.^[1][2]

Are you implying they didn't do well with Boris leading them? I'm not even saying they're a better team w/o Rique but they also aren't as bad w/o him as you're making it seem to prop up Rique.

Well, we all know he's not a good defender so his 6 assists overshadow 29%? Especially against an opponent like Latvia?

oh and I realize faltered is not a good thing but a cute one

maybe it's because mexican or something but as far as I know faltered is a cuttie of a word compared to terrible

smh

Again faltered is appropriate bc he played so well at the beginning of the series. When talking about the series in general, it makes no sense to use the word terrible bc he wasn't terrible throughout. Why is that so hard for you to grasp? If we're looking at the past three games in a vacuum and ignoring the rest of the series, then yes he was terrible.

[FkLA]

I can see it already, Rique shoots sub 30% against the 76ers...

reasonable people: 'damn he was awful'
rique s: 'there are other stats, he had a good game 6 assts'

[apalisoc_9]

I can see it already, Rique shoots sub 30% against the 76ers...

reasonable people: 'damn he was awful'
rique s: 'there are other stats, he had a good game 6 assts'

Those shots he missed resulted in offensive boards for the front court.

If you're watching the game right now, he's shooting France out of the game against Spain.

He's 2/8 I think...

[FkLA]

Those shots he missed resulted in offensive boards for the front court.

If you're watching the game right now, he's shooting France out of the game against Spain.

He's 2/8 I think...

jesus christ

Guess we better prepare for another season from him. Hope he isn't fat enough to sink the team two years in a row...fingers crossed that LMA will be enough to overcome the cancer. Or better yet that the cancer gets injured and goes into remission.

[apalisoc_9]

jesus christ

Guess we better prepare for another season from him. Hope he isn't fat enough to sink the team two years in a row...fingers crossed that LMA will be enough to overcome the cancer. Or better yet that the cancer gets injured and goes into remission.

He already has 3 turnovers..should be 4 really.

In the last 24 seconds of the first half, he tried going iso and then settled for a contested three that missed the rim by 25 feet.

[Brazil]

Are you implying they didn't do well with Boris leading them? I'm not even saying they're a better team w/o Rique but they also aren't as bad w/o him as you're making it seem to prop up Rique.

I'm implying you did not watch France playing basketball. I'm implying you are talking out your ass. I've watched all these games, they did well with Boris considering a lot of players were missing not only Parker.

Well, we all know he's not a good defender so his 6 assists overshadow 29%? Especially against an opponent like Latvia?

his 6 assists, his TS% at 49%, his +18, the fact the team built lead with Parker on the floor etc... this does not overshadow but give a more realistic picture that is the contrary of cherry pick a stat to fit an agenda.

Again faltered is appropriate bc he played so well at the beginning of the series. When talking about the series in general, it makes no sense to use the word terrible bc he wasn't terrible throughout. Why is that so hard for you to grasp? If we're looking at the past three games in a vacuum and ignoring the rest of the series, then yes he was terrible.

thanks