Reply With Quote
That's great.
What does that have to do with the OP?
Just to be clear, no bomb, no clock, no muslim: just notes.
Still: Handcuffs.
That's great.
What does that have to do with the OP?
So why did you call a real timer a timer hoax?
You take yourself too seriously on a message board. I don't want to hurt your E-rep or E-esteem, but the opposite is more true. You are the bukkake spoke of every forum, and well known to be hubristic and lacking awareness. Keep thumping your chest, Special Needs, it's always a show.To believe i am mocking you?
I'm always mocking you, as are many others. You're a running joke around here. Thanks for the laughs.
Exhibit A
It seems as if he's being dense to miss your point, although he could claim he's doing it to be mocking. Yet, he's always in character, so we can discard his excuse.
Staying on topic requires too much brain capacity for this 100 iq'd UTSA grad.
It's no wonder he will stick to petty squabbles and degenerate into a narcassistic rants about how he's 2 moves ahead of his opponent-though ironically from the outside looking in one observes a dog chasing his own tail.
I said "at best" allowing for other possibilities. You really don't know what that means?
Wow, that's really stupid of you. You've got to be feeling that inferiority right now.
Wow, that post shows you are really serious about this message board and quite sensitive about your E-rep.You take yourself too seriously on a message board. I don't want to hurt your E-rep or E-esteem, but the opposite is more true. You are the bukkake spoke of every forum, and well known to be hubristic and lacking awareness. Keep thumping your chest, Special Needs, it's always a show.
I'm sorry I hurt you and caused you to lash out like that.
Actually I was asking about the topic and how that post related to it.
You made it about me.
You always do.
Why is that?
Now you will claim internets victory because it's very important to you.
Whatever your hormonal rant was about, I can't get past the 5th grade spelling. I know it's a sports message board and grammar and spelling falls by the wayside all the time, but this is egregious.
Word of the Day For UTSA:
Egregious!
Hey, gtown declares internets victory over a typo!
I meant to type "shows" -- you couldn't figure that out yourself? Wow, that's not very smart of you.
So you were being densely serious and not mocking that you had to ask? Wow, you're a fool.
The burden is not on me to defend your competence and intelligence, it's on you.
It's a valid question. There were actual written threats in that instance. There weren't in the OP. You really couldn't figure that out?
I will now mock you for needing to have that explained to you.
Context and the fact that "E" is right next to "W" on the keyboard makes it pretty obvious what the intent was...
You really need someone to spell (no pun) that out for you?
So you were neither competent enough nor intelligent enough to figure it out on your own.
I believe you and edited the post so maybe now you can understand it.
The truth is Ignignokt graduated from your run-of-the-mill public school… but that doesn’t jibe well with his perception of himself, so he comes here and desperately searches for an opportunity to use his “word of the day” to prove that at some point in his life he browsed through his AP Vocab textbook. So impressed...
Where did you graduate from?
Thank you.
Are you stupid? He wasn't saying a bomb threat and a bomb hoax are the same. Just that they carry similar punishments, and that the whole muslim narrative is moot.
UTSA grads would never sniff an AP book tbh
Not the OP, specifically
This:
Which you asked. You seemed to insinuate that in order to have a bomb hoax, there must be a bomb. I pointed out that I have anecdotal evidence that there, in fact, does not need to be a bomb for there to be a bomb hoax.Where was the "bomb" part of the "hoax bomb"?
That was a written threat. What part of the pencil case clock did anyone find threatening?
If the other kid had been arrested for just putting pieces of paper with nothing on them in the bathroom, then they would be more similar.
And lol at your defensiveness about your education.
Alarm clocks going off in lockers and backpacks make people nervous for some strange reason.
In that case, they should be utterly terrified at the sound of cell phones.
You're right -- they don't want cell phones ringing at school. There are specific policies for cell phones, at least there are at my kids' schools.
A cell phone on silent can still trigger a bomb -- better confiscate them all, right?
Zero tolerance!
I think it's sound policy to not allow devices that could pass as bomb props at school.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
