Reply With Quote
0/10
You might want to post the postseason stats.
0/10
Lol. CN with the nuke.http://www.82games.com/1415/ROLRTG8.HTM
-2.4 net +/-, worst on the Spurs roster
Hey let's not forget Parker's historical "Backup Effect"...you know, the one where he's the only player on the team in the last 20 years that have had multiple backups cover up for his pathetic massive shrinkage and closed out series for him in route to championships!
Mike with another nuke.
Sadly those backup guys dont get any recognition, MVPorker reflects on these re s as a mirror of their personalities, they would love to bang the girls of their friends talk about themselves and be glorified even when they suck, but the numbers... they dont lie.
lol
Oh . Rook poster going in on raw on supercat.
I don't know where you get those stats, but the math is incorrect. Good job ting yourself.
Denial mode? good job hiding yourself in fear of being fully seen.
Parker s, manipulating stats since inmemorial times.
You still blowing at Guadalupe street?
Parker s, manipulating stats since inmemorial times.
No thanks, your mama is doing a great and cheap work in there.
Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
http://www.poundingtherock.com/2015/...ruggling-spursTony Parker
You can find columns addressing his many issues here, here and here. The TL;DR version is that, excellent three-point shooting aside, Parker hasn't been himself this season. He has a negative net rating (-2.6, in fact), the worst defensive rating for any rotation player besides Marco Belinelli, a below-average PER of 14.9 (worse than Cory Joseph's). Most worrying, he's been worse than a replacement-level player, according to basketball-reference.com. When Parker's been off the floor, the Spurs have an Offensive Rating of 105.4 and a Defensive Rating of 96.3, numbers that would trail only the Warriors. With Parker on the floor however, the Spurs are essentially the Sacramento Kings.
As a playmaker, the "pass" button seems to be stuck on Parker's controller. His assist-to-turnover ratio is 1.94, which would be the second-lowest of his career and is absolutely miserable for a point guard. He has totaled 44 fewer assists than Manu Ginobili in 45 fewer minutes. As a scorer, Parker's getting to rim less than ever, just 24.4 percent of his shots coming at the rim and 44.4 overall in the paint. He's averaging just 2.4 free throw attempts per game. Parker has yet to regain his quickness since hurting his hamstring and it's a fair question whether he ever will. Remember, he's already 32 and more dependent on his athleticism than Ginobili or Tim Duncan ever were. It's quite possible he'll age in dog years compared to his "Big Three" brethren because he doesn't have that ethereal level of savviness as a "Plan B," that they've shown.
It's worth remembering that Parker wasn't very good last year either, certainly not over the second half of that season and then in the postseason. The Spurs won it all anyway, memorably with Parker sidelined in the second halves of clinchers versus Portland and at Oklahoma City. But he wasn't this bad, and it's doubtful in the extreme that the Spurs can mount any kind of meaningful le defense with him in his current state. It's gotten to the point where I feel a bit relieved when Joseph or Patty Mills subs in for him.
the MVPorker effect makes us the Sacramento Kings, such a Spurs legend
Par per kiwi s, tbh.
http://www.poundingtherock.com/2015/...ruggling-spurs
the MVPorker effect makes us the Sacramento Kings, such a Spurs legend
http://www.poundingtherock.com/2015/...ruggling-spurs
the MVPorker effect makes us the Sacramento Kings, such a Spurs legend
What math is incorrect, moron?
Alpha predator mentality
lol at considering a pig a predatorAlpha predator mentality
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
