Jimmer was ranked #394 out of 400 players last year according to ESPN
http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/13...ed-nos-301-400
It's 16. The Spurs' 8 looks different than what he is wearing:
While the Six is more of a "boxy" loop:
Jimmer was ranked #394 out of 400 players last year according to ESPN
http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/13...ed-nos-301-400
Thats slightly higher than I expected
61 pages for a top 395 player in the league.
Whereever Mills was ranked, that's realistically about where Jimmer should be ranked.
Put the pipe down. Bummer hasn't proven anything on the NBA level. Stop this ifs and buts . It's on him. I hope he proves me wrong.
Mills has proven to be a gamer on the biggest stage in the world. To compare the two is a complete insult to Patty.
Mills has been in good situations and continued his progress in a great organization. Jimmer has been in dysfunctional situations. Yet the two have very comparable per36's.
Sacramento - clearly dysfunctional. The textbook definition
Chicago - dysfunctional is a stretch.
Pelicans - a young team which made the playoffs. Dysfunctional would be exaggerating as well.
I am rooting for him. It's a calculated low risk move, but the odds of success are low
IKR
has anybody taken the bait on the "lol white american" thing yet?Jesus, 59 pages for a borderline NBA scrub
Kings were the poster child for dysfunctional.
Bulls never committed to Jimmer; he came in late; that's okay, I suppose.
Pelicans made the playoffs; but that doesn't mean they weren't dysfunctional. Losing that 20 plus point lead in the playoff game vs. the Warriors came as no shock to me. Take AD from that team, and they would have been a train wreck. From Jimmer's p.o.v. Monty was kind of a tool. He pulled him after any turnover or missed shot; and when he played well, he was not rewarded with more PT. It was not a good fit whether you want to call it dysfunctional or not.
....
Depends on what you consider success. I think the odds of Jimmer being a significant contributor are somewhat high. If we're talking about really burning rubber and rising in the ranks; well, I temper my outlook.
Considering I've been saying it for years, yes, there have been many discussions regarding that topic..
First time in this thread, didn't read, a little summary?
Let me paint it for you in ways other than what's already been mentioned.
Jimmer has one decernable NBA skill, outside shooting, however, his release is horribly slow, which forced most of his shots in a team that didn't space very well to be found out to the point that he shot 18 friggen percent from three.
Lets play devils advocate for a moment and assume Pop spaces the floor better for him and Chip fixes his release timing, and he bumps it back up to 35 this year. Cool.
now compare that to Patty.
Now our mate has two decernable NBA skills, his shooting, and elite level NBA speed. The speed affords him the ability to play pesky defence get steals and get open himself without the heavily reliance on spacing that JF needs, and at his worst he is going to give you that same 35 that Jimmer gives you assuming a lot goes his way. Plus mills is a better passer and a better ball handler.
to suggest that Jimsey is currently the same level of NBA player as Mills really makes you look stupid dude.
There is one poster who keeps this thread up and a rotating cast of people saying "jimmer really? Wtf?" along with "Mormon supremacists" being thrown around.
You just saw Mills being = jimmer stated as argument. That's pretty par for the level of discussion in this thread.
Used Jimmer in 2k today, dude banged down some mad shots tbh
He was higher than a certain Spurs PG when they were using numbers and not just pulling arbitrary rankings out of their ass
http://espn.go.com/nba/statistics/rp...RPM/position/1
If Jimmer ends up making any worthwhile contribution to the Spurs, then something will have gone horribly, horribly wrong.
because you have slow-footed bigs like zbo trying to close out bonner
Something can be said for having your last guy getting this reaction.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SrM-Xpoz1qE
Untrue.
Please. 2.5 to 1.7 ATR. You on drugs boy.
and Mills was significantly higher than both of them
Where are you getting these numbers?
These two players are very similar. They are jump shooters who are not afraid to take big shots. Where I find Jimmer's Assist numbers to be low for playing with SAC, I think Mills has a high TO for playing with SA. Either way, they both are averaging PER GAME through their career a little over 1 apg and a little under 1 TOpg.
Shooting stats are similar, though I think Patty has a better shot, I don't know if that would be the case if Jimmer gets in the rotation.
People on here talking about release and shot need to get real. Jimmer is a 38% 3pt shooter on 500 attempts. Release is not a problem. ADDITIONALLY Jimmer is a sub. Do you really think that when/if he gets in the game, the opponent will put their BEST DEFENDER on him? I would say probably not.
And Fredette's TOV's were significantly better than Mills in their first couple years. Then, Mills finally settled into a system and his TOV's went down. Jimmer's never had that luxury...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions