Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 108
  1. #26
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    42,561

    Meh, it was important enough for Jake Tapper to ask questions about it at the GOP debate.

  2. #27
    Veteran Ignignokt's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Post Count
    7,042
    Yes, the whole family spent six years planning the whole clock caper just to avenge the suspension that the daughter freely admitted to the press.

    Diabolical!

    The conspiracy widens -- this one goes all the way to Caliph Obama!
    poisoning the well.

    argumentum ad absurdim

  3. #28
    Still Hates Small Ball Spurminator's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Post Count
    37,751
    Meh, it was important enough for Jake Tapper to ask questions about it at the GOP debate.
    I'll have to take your word for it, but it was certainly a big social media story the day it happened (same day as the debate, if I recall) and CNN loves them some social media news stories.

  4. #29
    Veteran Ignignokt's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Post Count
    7,042
    His sister moving in to ahmeds rent free apt
    argumentum di third world mudskindum

  5. #30
    Veteran Ignignokt's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Post Count
    7,042
    Damn, do you have to start a new thread for everything you tie to this obsession of yours!?!?
    False attribution. Poisoning the well. Ad hominem.

  6. #31
    Veteran Ignignokt's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Post Count
    7,042
    How is 2009 only 3 years earlier than 2015? Though that's the least of the problems with this story.
    denying the antecedent.

  7. #32
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    83,636
    poisoning the well.

    argumentum ad absurdim
    argumentum di third world mudskindum
    False attribution. Poisoning the well. Ad hominem.
    denying the antecedent.
    Argumentum ad nauseum re ed dom

  8. #33
    Independent DMX7's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    22,149
    Ignignokt = non compos mentis

  9. #34
    Veteran Ignignokt's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Post Count
    7,042
    Ignignokt = non compos mentis
    sympathetus suckulus

  10. #35
    Veteran Ignignokt's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Post Count
    7,042
    Argumentum ad nauseum re ed dom
    argumentum ad cucktainium

  11. #36
    Deandre Jordan Sucks m>s's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Post Count
    9,768
    what'd she do exactly
    Bomb threat

  12. #37
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    83,636
    according to who

  13. #38
    Deandre Jordan Sucks m>s's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Post Count
    9,768
    according to who
    The school

  14. #39
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,406
    I don't believe the school has commented on it at all.

    Do you have a link of their saying it was about a bomb threat?

  15. #40
    Deandre Jordan Sucks m>s's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Post Count
    9,768
    I don't believe the school has commented on it at all.

    Do you have a link of their saying it was about a bomb threat?
    She said it out of her own mouth. Of course her story is that she was innocent and dindu nuffin those meanies just falsely accused her!

  16. #41
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,406
    She said it out of her own mouth. Of course her story is that she was innocent and dindu nuffin those meanies just falsely accused her!
    So you don't have a link of the school's commenting on it?

    As a self-styled minister of information, you can't get even the most basic facts right.

  17. #42
    Veteran Ignignokt's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Post Count
    7,042
    So you don't have a link of the school's commenting on it?

    As a self-styled minister of information, you can't get even the most basic facts right.
    Continuum Fallacy
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuum_fallacy

    The continuum fallacy (also called the fallacy of the beard,[1] line drawing fallacy, bald man fallacy, fallacy of the heap, the sorites fallacy) is an informal fallacy closely related to the sorites paradox, or paradox of the heap. The fallacy causes one to erroneously reject a vague claim simply because it is not as precise as one would like it to be. Vagueness alone does not necessarily imply invalidity.

  18. #43
    Deandre Jordan Sucks m>s's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Post Count
    9,768
    So you don't have a link of the school's commenting on it?

    As a self-styled minister of information, you can't get even the most basic facts right.
    So are you saying breitbart made it up and the family, the school, nor anyone else are calling them down on it? You're dumb

  19. #44
    Deandre Jordan Sucks m>s's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Post Count
    9,768
    sounds like a school district went racist 2 times over non-bombs
    What did the bomb sound like when Mookie dropped it on 4cc? Do u know the one to which I refer?

  20. #45
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,406
    Continuum Fallacy
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuum_fallacy

    The continuum fallacy (also called the fallacy of the beard,[1] line drawing fallacy, bald man fallacy, fallacy of the heap, the sorites fallacy) is an informal fallacy closely related to the sorites paradox, or paradox of the heap. The fallacy causes one to erroneously reject a vague claim simply because it is not as precise as one would like it to be. Vagueness alone does not necessarily imply invalidity.
    Is it like your pointing out a typo?

  21. #46
    Veteran Ignignokt's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Post Count
    7,042
    sounds like a school district went racist 2 times over non-bombs
    inductive fallacy, correlative fallacy.

  22. #47
    Veteran Ignignokt's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Post Count
    7,042
    What did the bomb sound like when Mookie dropped it on 4cc? Do u know the one to which I refer?
    off topic

    but DAYYYYYUUUMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! loloololololol

  23. #48
    Veteran Ignignokt's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Post Count
    7,042
    Is it like your pointing out a typo?
    no that's just me pointing out a typo, just like i point out your fallacies.

  24. #49
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,406
    no that's just me pointing out a typo, just like i point out your fallacies.
    Did you find yours?

  25. #50
    Veteran Ignignokt's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Post Count
    7,042
    Did you find yours?

    too quoue fallacy


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_quoque

    Tu quoque (/tuːˈkwoʊkwiː/;[1] Latin for "you, too" or "you, also") or the appeal to hypocrisy is an informal logical fallacy that intends to discredit the validity of the opponent's logical argument by asserting the opponent's failure to act consistently in accordance with its conclusion(s).

    It is a fallacy because the moral character or past actions of the opponent are generally irrelevant to the logic of the argument.[2] It is often used as a red herring tactic and is a special case of the ad hominem fallacy, which is a category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of fact about the person presenting or supporting the claim or argument.[3] It is distinct from an argument condemning double standards, which argues against an opponent's moral standing to demand better conduct from others when guilty of similar misconduct themselves, without suggesting that the logic of their argument is compromised by that misconduct.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •