and you're sure she was suspended?
Yeah, but you did have a typo today and asked me about it.
Did you forget? I know you've been busy pasting all day.
and you're sure she was suspended?
argumentum ad infinitum
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_nauseam
argumentum ad cucktainerum
Ironically, it was "argument" -- English for "argumentum".![]()
too quoque fallacy. no valid argument presented.
Tu quoque
lol that was the best part.
Dude's probably fuming over that now. I think you extended this shtick for another few hours at least.
Sorry, it just came so soon after discussing your other error.
off topic.
You shouldn't have asked about it then, forum cop.
asked what? i haven't asked a question on this thread. Do you know what a question is?
You asked in the other thread.. Is there some sort of firewall rule in your internet cop manual about questions being restricted to one thread?
Do you not remember asking?
off topic
You should carry that argument in that thread then. This thread is about Ahmed's involvement in a previous bomb threat. Your concern with scoring E flamewar points is not important.
What are you saying was Ahmed's involvement in a previous bomb threat?
What has anyone said is his involvement in a previous bomb threat in this thread?
ahmed's sister. thanks for the correction.
You're welcome. You looked really stupid there for a minute. Ahmed was like 8, but I guess you can find an 8 year old rapist/murderer out there.
Better a second than 30 something years though
You get like that wrong all the time; just like earlier today.
Quan y trumps well... lesser quan y. lol
That goes for me too
I just said it goes for you too.
Right. Still waiting for verification of sister's suspension
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)