Reply With Quote
i'm waiting for the m>s thread about....
false flag
- tries to predict when others will bring up gun rights
- simultaneously brings up gun rights
i'm waiting for the m>s thread about....
Bammy realllly ed up these republican conservative gun fellationists
5 VRWC anti-Cons utional/anti-stare decisis SCOTUS tools vs 4 serious judges.District of Columbia v. er, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), was a landmark case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held in a 5-4 decision that the Second Amendment to the United States Cons ution protects an individual's right to possess a firearm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home.
Dumb cuck
dumb cuck
Any info on motive?
Only thing new I've heard is he went to a school for kids with behavioral issues.
Have they decided on what long gun he used? He's pictured with a Ruger 10-22 but the talking heads keep saying AR15.
The dude probably developed a deep hatred for women tbh. Same as that ****** dude last year.
Haven't heard much backstory about the shooter.
IMO banning guns, even high caliber ones, isn't going to do much to solve the problem of mass murder. There'll be less mass shooting, but these crazy pos will use whatever means they can to meet their sick desired end. Columbine shooters built bomb (that didn't go off but if it did would've killed 200+), Colorado theater killer built one (that again didn't go off), Boston marathon bombers & McVeigh succeeded. Playing Devil's advocate here, but maybe an unintended consequence of taking guns out of equation actually makes mass killings worse because of the blast radius which kills and wounds far more people than guns.
Whatever the the case I don't think people should have access to high caliber guns (eg AR-15). Wanna use one? Join the military. That's no a defense weapon, it's damn assault combat weapon that belongs in combat/war.
Oregon shooting: Gunman had white supremacy leanings and was obsessed with guns, source says
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-...002-story.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/03/us...=top-news&_r=0
He was a "good kid". They're all "good kids".Another neighbor, a man in his 50s who declined to give his name, said that Mr. Mercer lived on the second floor of the three-story building with his mother. He said he believed they were both students. “Chris was a good kid, you know,” he said...
You clearly don't understand the definition of high caliber if you think the .223 qualifies (eg AR-15)
And what is an acceptable defense weapon in your opinion?
I do not post in /r9k/, pretty much just /b/, /tv/, and /sp/
the parents are always shocked when their weird ass kid fly's off the handle smh.
“I'd ask the American people to think about how they can get our government to change these laws and to save lives and to let young people grow up, and that will require a change of politics on this issue,” Obama said.
And what law exactly would have changed any of this Mr. Obama?
why do you ask when you know the answer?
Chicago über alles: Fox News’ directive from on high — if Obama discusses a mass-shooting, you mention Chicago
http://www.salon.com/2015/10/02/chic...e_second_city/
‘Good Guy With A Gun’ Was On UCC Campus At Time Of Massacre
But not only was UCC not a gun free zone by law, there were also people who brought guns onto campus at the time of the massacre.
John Parker Jr., a veteran and student at UCC, spoke with MSNBC and revealed that he was in a campus building with a concealed handgun when the shooting started. He suggested other students with him at the time were also carrying concealed handguns.
The issue of whether UCC was a “gun free zone” has become a source of controversy. Gun advocates argue that “gun free zones” encourage gun violence by creating a space where people are unable to defend themselves.
This is not supported by the facts. According to a study of 62 mass shootings over 30 years conducted by Mother Jones, “not a single case includes evidence that the killer chose to target a place because it banned guns.” Many of those mass shootings took place in areas were guns where permitted, but not a single one was stopped by armed civilians.
Parker’s interview revealed the practical difficulties of armed civilians trying to stop a mass shooting. By the time he became aware of the shooting, a SWAT team had already responded. He was concerned that police would view him as a “bad guy” and target him, so he quickly retreated into the classroom.
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/201...e-of-massacre/
"A study conducted by Mother Jones"
It was evident that Obama was being nostalgic in talking about regulations that have been enacted in the past. None of them would stand a chance of being passed under the current intransigent congressional regime.
Charlie Pierce made that reality abundantly clear.
"I've been doing the politics blog only since the fall of 2011," Charlie Pierce said. "This I think is the fourth one of these I had to write about. I was struck by the last bit by the president, where he talked about other things where you react to.
The fact remains we only allow ourselves two political parties in this country. And one of our political parties is completely insane. [emphasis added] It's the party that when we have mine disasters, blocks mine regulations.
It's the party that says when we want to fix our roads, you can't have an infrastructure bill.
You can't raise the gas tax.
It's the party that when some people have floods, like New Jersey, marks Chris Christie lousy because he accepted help from the federal government.
And we have the same party who has somewhere between three and 600 people running for president, none of whom will do anything about the problem of mass shootings in America."
In an irony of ironies, the sheriff of the county where the massacre occurred, Douglas County,wrote a defiant letter to Vice President Biden after the Sandy Hook school massacrestating he would obey no gun control laws he deemed uncons utional. When will Americans snap?
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/1...e?detail=email
No surprise that you can't refute the "bull " from MJ and TP.
What is the answer Ms. Boutons?
I've you on that before, Do Your Own Research -- WC
Media just loves to say "execution-style" for every shooting
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/10/02...ing-classroom/
Chris Mintz a member at ChumpDumper's second most visited forum.
So you've got no answer? Sounds like all guns legally acquired, so which new law would have prevented this tragedy?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions