Stay up porkers asshole.
So dar, Ray's been much better than Jimmer.
Now two unknown players are in their primes -- including a rookie. And Kawhi is the one that has been missing 1/5 of each season.
Bonner at the three?And this says nothing of three guard line-ups and Diaw or Bonner playing the occasional three.
You reach further and further with every page of this thread.
Stay up porkers asshole.
Stay up your krew's assholes and they will stay up yours.Stay up porkers asshole.
I meant young and good; that's prime to me. But if you want to split hairs....
At the end of the day, Butler is behind three better, younger players. The rationale for adding him to the team is very limited.
It is not clear at all that Simmons is better than Butler. A vet who can sit on the bench without complaint and be effective when needed is exactly what a team like this needs.
I thought the Spurs learned their lesson with signing old guys.
Are you talking about Butler?I thought the Spurs learned their lesson with signing old guys.
KA and Simmons are still a bit unproven. But they're the future and in all likelihood better options than Butler this season. Adding Butler to the team is done putting him as the fourth string wing. I don't see it happening. And remember that KA and Simmons are under contract; so, taking Butler means having four wings in any event.
Simmons "a bit" unproven.
more reaching.
Simmons may be the future, but he isn't the present. He's being groomed to play the 2, not the 3.
Why the overreaction to a single game in the preseason. This is a marathon, not a sprint for Jimmer.
Who else?
OK, what did he do last night to make you think he can't play on the Spurs?
He may not have many more chances on the Spurs.
You're making a case for an aging wing with a clear ceiling and will not likely be needed or get much real run if any; and you're advocating this fourth wing to the detriment of the guard core. And you're ignoring luxury tax implications at the same time. I think you're the one that's reaching.Simmons "a bit" unproven.
Simmons may be the future, but he isn't the present. He's being groomed to play the 2, not the 3.
The spurs shouldn't invest their time on a player on their last legs that isn't part of the big three. Had nothing to do with last night.
He'd be the third SF, there would be three SGs as well. Three PGs too. All without Jimmer.
So you made another judgment without watching someone play.
Not actually addressing the topic for like the tenth time today.So you made another judgment without watching someone play.
Spurs aren't going to throw away $500K because of a bad game, or even a few. This was a few minutes of bad play, nothing more.
Actually, it is exactly the topic.Not actually addressing the topic for like the tenth time today.
Don't get upset because you didn't watch the game. You don't care about roster spots filled by people like Butler, remember?
Or do you care now?
Eh, it's just not that much money if he continues to suck. That's why it's only a partial guarantee.
Besides, if he's as good as you all say he'd be picked off waivers anyway.
You don't think his age is a factor you stupid ?
Can anyone show us his injury history?
Judging from last season, what I saw last night and considering how he would be used by the Spurs, no.You don't think his age is a factor you stupid ?
I recalled Kawhi's injury history, which I believe to be more of a factor here.Can anyone show us his injury history?
Keep not watching players play -- it really helps your argument.
Kawhi's knees and ankles are fine. Resting, pink eye and a broken finger have you worried?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions