Reply With Quote
Ravens IMO...
I don't know how much the Terrell Suggs injury plays into it, but they're the most disappointing to me.
Most disappointing team, so far?
- Dolphins(AFC sleeper of most mainstream analysts IIRC)
- Chiefs(a lot of people picked them to win the division)
- Ravens(always steady and consistent)
- Texans(weren't necessarily expected to be good, but not as embarrassing as they have looked)
- Lions
- Eagles
(Didn't include Seattle, because their schedule has been tough and they have been compe ive..Dallas not included for obvious reasons..Saints may be disappointing to some, but most people expected them to suck, including their fans here IIRC)..
Ravens IMO...
I don't know how much the Terrell Suggs injury plays into it, but they're the most disappointing to me.
I expected the Ravens to be Super Bowl bound if they fixed the secondary, but that was pre-Suggs injury. Still, they've been the biggest disappointment IMO.
Ravens and Dolphins.
1) Colts and Andrew Cuck. their record is fine for now, but they look hideous
2) Dolphins - everybody's offseason/preseason sweetheart
3) Ravens
Last edited by spurraider21; 10-11-2015 at 07:08 PM.
Ravens.
The Dolphins were pretty much what I expected them to be and never believed that the Chiefs, Eagles, Texans, and Lions were going to do anything.
I don't know why anyone ever believes in the Dolphins. They're a straw dog every year.
Exactly. They could have the best secondary, the best linebackers, the best linemen on both ends, and the best receiving corps and they'd still be the lolphins and 7–9
Ravens and then Dolpins imo. I didn't expect Ravens to the bed like this without Suggs. People on ST, some of the gook variety, made it sound like Flacco was this unstoppable force.
True. I always hope the Pats will have compe ion in their division but every season it's a total show.
I didn't expect anything from the Chiefs, Lions and Texans, but they have probably been the 3 most embarrassing teams(other than Miami), so far..Chiefs have had 2 horrible 4th quarter meltdowns, and the Texans/Lions are tough to watch..
I've always said Stafford is overrated, but still, a team with him, Johnson, Tate and Abdullah shouldn't be so bad at offense..
How about your boy Struggle today? Boy, he really played like a franchise QB down the stretch:
Thinking the Seahawks wouldn't trade Wilson for Andrew "Cuck" straight up in a heartbeat if they could
wilson played poorly in the 2nd half today, and you won't see me claim otherwise
never said this, either. i've said luck>wilson all along. luck also has higher expectations... supposed to be an MVP candidate, colts were picked by many to be a SB team due to his excellence. his season is more of a disappointment than wilsons because his expectations are significantly higher
Struggle has a fat new contract and a mega-stacked team. Luck once again has a garbage supporting cast. As per usual, the Colts added a bunch of old fossils at the skill positions and completely ignored the rest of the roster. And they have a coaching staff. The Seahawks are supposed to be a dynasty with the defense they have, but Struggle's already taken one out of the case and is working on taking another one out.
Easily the Ravens.
so you disagree that luck is better than wilson and thus has higher expectations?
Tony Parker's contract
Luck > Wilson
Wilson's expectations > Luck's expectations
It's not hard.
Yup, Baltimore
Lombardi and Caldwell is the worst coaching duo in the nfl. Combine that with a below average defense and average(below average qb?) and you don't have any margin of error to have an off day. Instead of the usual heart breakers you just get blown out at home.
Hopefully we go 2-14 and the Ford's finally sell the team to someone who might actually be invested in the sport though.
Ravens?,,,,no way. Seattle easily,,,A team that has made back to back Super Bowl appearances and is 2-3 but was a top 3 favorite to win it all this year.
seattle should be on the list as well... we knew they wouldn't be quite as good as they were the past couple of years, but their offense has been really disappointing, especially with the jimmy graham trade. it's been a horrible fit and they traded their best (yet oft-injured) offensive lineman to acquire him, now their line is largely in shambles
Did anyone actually expect Seattle to be a good fit for Graham?
Easy Ravens. They are not bad as their record indicate.
i recall Luke Wilson having some big moments for them late last year, and a big, easy target makes a lot of sense for seattle. the curious thing is, it's not like wilson and graham have been having miscommunications or misconnecting... they're just not using him in their gameplan
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
