that the Obama Administration approached Argentina with the request to provide enriched Uranium to Iran back in 2010... she made these declarations at the U.N. General Assembly meeting held on September 28 (one of the links below has her address at the New York U.N. Summit). She also stated that the same requests were made to France and Russia.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015...eral-assembly/
http://www.figuro.us/world-leader-ac...nited-nations/
http://beforeitsnews.com/obama/2015/...l-2474388.html
See... that right there is what the leftist crowd doesn't understand (on this forum or in general). I was in Europe for the better part of a month and these shocking declarations were the talk of the night across EVERY major media outlet for at least a week. I come back home to find it wasn't even a footnote in the local papers, wasn't a highlighted article on Yahoo / Google, etc... Media bias is out of control. These allegations are SERIOUS in light of the Iran treaty that was signed just last month.
Sure enough, I did a search on our "leftist" political forum, and unless I missed it - didn't see a single mention of these allegations either.
Edited for de-escalation...
Last edited by Phenomanul; 10-16-2015 at 03:23 PM.
What's the controversy? It was open knowledge at the time that one of the options they were trying to use to convince Iran to ship out its stockpiles was that a third country would supply enriched uranium for their research reactors. They also discussed having Russia enrich the uranium and ship it back.
And I just got back from England, didn't hear this mentioned once on Sky News or BBC.
leftist political forum
enriched uranium isn't weaponized uranium, or plutonium
my guess is that US was trying to get Iran uranium for nuclear reactors, not for bombs.
Sure the mainstream media is the mouthpiece of the CIA. But, why is this treason?
nuclear fuel dealings is a daily thing.
I saw this but I deliberately didn't post anything and also worked with a shadow group of hackers to remove as many mentions of it online as possible. Guess we missed a few.
I guess you're not familiar with the terms of the Iran treaty that was signed last month... it paints a different picture of that period than what was being let on in the media. Iran should not have access to any enriched Uranium, period (research reactors...please!) - it was the unanimous stance of the IAEA / NATO / the UN / and the US. To find out that the US THEN tried to leverage other countries to provide the Uranium runs counter to our publically disclosed policies - which prevented Iran from having it in the first place.
Typical idiocy that you can't see the diplomatic inconsistency for the subversion that it was - an elephant in the living room.
Google weapons grade uranium bro.
The Pope being in NY that week trumped any mentions of Kirchner's U.N. address...
Sure... If you want to land on some FBI monitoring list...
Hardy har har... laugh it up... until Iran precipitates the next world war.
http://www.bloombergview.com/quickta...ium-enrichmentI guess you're not familiar with the terms of the Iran treaty that was signed last month... it paints a different picture of that period than what was being let on in the media. Iran should not have access to any enriched Uranium, period (research reactors...
Typical idiocy that you can't see the diplomatic inconsistency for the subversion that it was - an elephant in the living room.
All sounds fine and dandy, until we learn they've garnered the ability to enrich Uranium to WGU - knowledge which will likely come after they've used it somewhere.
Is that a threat?
If anything, I'm just surprised none of this was mentioned on local outlets or even in passing on this forum (which seemingly discusses everything).
This was known in Argentina back in 2010... not who asked for it, but that there were deals being worked out to supply Iran with fuel for their reactor buildup. It was around the time when the US wanted Iran to stop producing it's own Uranium and import it instead. It caused a big political backlash in Argentina though, because Iran was allegedly behind the terrorist attacks against Israel's AMIA and embassy in Buenos Aires a couple decades ago, which were never fully resolved.
All that said, it's always good to mix up your reading material. I have the Telegraph, BBC, El Pais and a few other euro news sites along with some Argentina sites I check periodically since I still have family there.
If you wanna feel threatened go right ahead man
IF there was nothing wrong or covert about what the administration was doing THEN the U.S. would have acquiesced Argentina's pe ion to have the request issued in writing. Instead they balked. You do the math.Sure the mainstream media is the mouthpiece of the CIA. But, why is this treason?
nuclear fuel dealings is a daily thing.
Out of all the covert things the US does. This really ranks very low.
Sure I agree there should have been a news here about it but if FOX news didn't even pick it up. It's because nobody gives a
I guess you're not familiar with the terms of the Iran treaty that was signed last month... it paints a different picture of that period than what was being let on in the media. Iran should not have access to any enriched Uranium, period (research reactors...
Typical idiocy that you can't see the diplomatic inconsistency for the subversion that it was - an elephant in the living room.
This is a big nothing burger unless you live in some Breitbart induced fantasy world.
So then there is an admission of covertness?
I really don't see the big deal here.
Low grade uranium "equals not" enriched uranium... thanks for playing.
This is a big nothing burger unless you live in some Breitbart induced fantasy world.
If it wasn't a big deal how come neither Argentina, France or Russia carried out the Administration's request. I mean. "It's not a big deal". Why did none of those countries provide the enriched uranium fuel? Or better yet, why didn't the U.S. provide it outright? Why seek for others to provide it?
I really don't see the big deal here.
Fact is.
It was covert. IT WAS A BIG DEAL. And U.S. involvement was deliberately kept out of the mainstream picture.
Your own article says the Russians and French agreed.
And its not covert if the official US envoy asks this in an official diplomatic meeting
LoL
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
