Paris attacks

[Blizzardwizard]

So we can only discuss them getting shot by the terrorists with guns?

So if you like debating guns after events why do you always throw out the 'can't even wait until the bodies turn cold' when anyone anti-gun says anything about gun control after shootings? Does it only work one way?

[TheSanityAnnex]

So if you like debating guns after events why do you always throw out the 'can't even wait until the bodies turn cold' when anyone anti-gun says anything about gun control after shootings? Does it only work one way?

I wasn't debating guns I simply stated I bet the hostages wished they had a way to fight back.

[TheSanityAnnex]

CIA Woolsey on msnbc blaming hero Snowden for Paris.

Although I side with what Snowden did, Woolsey has a point. Intelligence gathering on al-queda/isis/etc grinded to a halt once terrorists started using encryption or stopped using electronic communications all together.

[UNT Eagles 2016]

Please stop your stupidity. These terrorists are from Syria. US is not there getting oil. Obama wanted to bomb Syria. He is bombing and sending special units into Syria to kill ISIS.

Word. If Obama was smart, he'd ally exclusively with Assad/Putin on Syria and exclusively operate AGAINST ISIS and the FSA/Al Nusra associated terrorist groups that have instigated this multi-year siege against the secular Alawite government. The Alawites have the right to defend themselves and retaliate against insurgency. ISIS needs to be destroyed ASAP, at all costs.

[ChumpDumper]

I wasn't debating guns I simply stated I bet the hostages wished they had a way to fight back.

Sounds like it. They are saying up to 8 people are holding 100 people hostage. Instead of being killed 1 by 1 a hundred people can overtake 8 gunmen. Of course some will die in the process but seems better than waiting around to be shot. Anyone arguing against concealed carry at a time like that would be a fool.

That last part is definitely about gun policy.

[boutons_deux]

Although I side with what Snowden did, Woolsey has a point. Intelligence gathering on al-queda/isis/etc grinded to a halt once terrorists started using encryption or stopped using electronic communications all together.

the CIA/NSA hasn't changed on bit because of Snowden.

Strong encryption was available to everybody, including terrorists, before Snowden.

[hater]

So you are saying that in that very same scenario you would CHOOSE to not be armed and curl up in a ball waiting to be shot rather than trying to save your own life.

Vs a couple or armed explosive trained jihadists all civilians would. So would you and also so would the poster John Smith. Yall would your pants pik all other civilians.

[TheSanityAnnex]

That last part is definitely about gun policy.

Cool. And I still bet those hostages wished they had a way to fight back.

[ChumpDumper]

Cool. And I still bet those hostages wished they had a way to fight back.

So your denial was silly.

[TheSanityAnnex]

the CIA/NSA hasn't changed on bit because of Snowden.

Strong encryption was available to everybody, including terrorists, before Snowden.

Terrorists were not using it then like they are now post Snowden revelations.

[johnsmith]

the CIA/NSA hasn't changed on bit because of Snowden.

Strong encryption was available to everybody, including terrorists, before Snowden.

How do you know that the CIA/NSA hasn't changed? Please explain

[TheSanityAnnex]

So your denial was silly.

Not denying and wasn't debating.

[boutons_deux]

How do you know that the CIA/NSA hasn't changed? Please explain

they're CIA/NSA, they makes their own rules, break everybody elses. There's no Congressional,or any, oversight, and the CIA/NSA know it.

[TheSanityAnnex]

the CIA/NSA hasn't changed on bit because of Snowden.

Strong encryption was available to everybody, including terrorists, before Snowden.

there are plenty of more articles I can link if you'd like

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...-official.html

[ChumpDumper]

Not denying and wasn't debating.

Of course you just wanted to make your snarky political statement and let it remain unchallenged; you told us.

[johnsmith]

they're CIA/NSA, they makes their own rules, break everybody elses. There's no Congressional,or any, oversight, and the CIA/NSA know it.

So therefore you know they haven't changed anything? Makes sense

[johnsmith]

they're CIA/NSA, they makes their own rules, break everybody elses. There's no Congressional,or any, oversight, and the CIA/NSA know it.

So therefore you know they haven't changed anything? Makes sense

[TheSanityAnnex]

Of course you just wanted to make your snarky political statement and let it remain unchallenged; you told us.

And?

[ChumpDumper]

And?

And what? I made a statement.

[TheSanityAnnex]

the CIA/NSA hasn't changed on bit because of Snowden.

Strong encryption was available to everybody, including terrorists, before Snowden.

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q...+snowden+leaks

[TheSanityAnnex]

And what? I made a statement.

That's wonderful dear.

[ChumpDumper]

That's wonderful dear.

You always get so pissy when you're called out.

It's adorable.

[johnsmith]

Vs a couple or armed explosive trained jihadists all civilians would. So would you and also so would the poster John Smith. Yall would your pants pik all other civilians.

Hey dummy...I haven't said anything about guns or what I would or wouldn't do....the only thing I've done is point out what an idiot you are for having your feelings hurt that someone else wants to discuss a political topic in the politics forum.

I'm shocked, shocked I tell you that you wouldn't understand what I've been laughing AT you about though.

[TheSanityAnnex]

You always get so pissy when you're called out.

It's adorable.

Called out lol go put another gold star sticker on your monitor.

[cd98]

US/UK/BigOil invaded Iraq for oil and then to regime change also Syria and Iran, too. ISIS arose DIRECTLY from the Repug-destabilized Middle East.

You mother ers are hilariously gullible, stupid, ignorant.

You think the Syrian terrorists are in France b/c of Iraq? That's either moronic or an attempt to spin facts to fit trite and baseless theory. US didn't take any of the Iraqi oil. They gave it to the Iraqi government while it was stable. Once Obama pulled the troops and the government collapsed, it fell to ISIS.