Chump....
My .
Does anyone think if I say his name a third time he appears?![]()
This. And I don't even hate parker or anything but it's sad watching idiots like thegreatfraud trying it's best to turn the forum against kawhi. What a clown.
I sacrificed a sheep to make you disappear ... that did not work either
Feel bad for that sheep now tbh.
Maybe you should have given him the sheep instead...
ChumpDumper 3 sup.
Sup, you watching tonight game? You can catch three quarters before your bed time.
Seriously, don't you have something better to do rather than play forum troll.can you tell me how you disagree with op?
82 games in the season. I can't watch all of them. I watch around like 70+ a year. Yeah I'll be watching this game though.
Little bored this morning. Slow morning. Also funny you always protect your friend(OP).Both of ya french right?
Anyways, the premise of this thread was to show how Parker is better than Patty but that POV is wrong.
OP casually ignores how Tony sucks. I've seen Tony last year healthy play minutes with the second unit(something like manu beli and parker for an extended time)and was supposed to be an offensive juggernaut but instead they just got owned so bad and they couldn't score either. That was the end of that.
Kinda going off in a tangent. Just wanted to point out that Tony to the bench is a bigger catastrophe than playing with the first unit. Parker is getting the Kobe treatment but with a REAL team around him.
If you thought tony's advance stats look bad on the Spurs, imagine it 3 times worse on the bench.
Don't know where I'm going with this. Just need parker to do less and play less minutes for the sake of this franchise.
Honestly if you have to use stats to argue that Parker > Mills, It just prove even more how much Tony has regressed
I don't blame him, He did everything he could. He had a solid 15 years career, more than a lot of hofer and had a great 12' and 13' peak
Agreed to some degree, but just more or less responding to this "idea" (and that's all it is) that Mills scores more than Parker for the limited minutes he gets. That's just not true (but it sounds good and some people have started to actually believe it). The assists thing is pretty obvious, we all know Patty is not a true PG (neither is Parker for that matter, but Patty is really a SG that we use at PG). All that to say that I had actually started to believe that in Parker's regression, he was scoring less than Patty per minute, so I was pretty surprised actually to realize he wasnt (and really never has).
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)