Kawhi hater on ISH that is from ST

[dabom]

'Kawhi "The Spurs are 0-4 when Kawhi takes 18 FGA or more in a game... He's talked about passing Timmy in rings, how about passing it TO Timmy instead?"' -ISH

http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/showthread.php?t=391093&page=2

As you can see in these threads where he got his trolling from

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...78#post8296578

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...=253644&page=4

And another Spurs fan corrects his dumbass.

'Technically the Spurs are 3-4 when Kawhi has attempted 18 field goals or more.'

Dam Brazil. As you can see you ain't honest if a troll is using your trolling material.

[ChumpDumper]

dabom engineering nonstop today.

[dabom]

One post today.

[dabom]

I swear chump the biggest rag on these boards.

[ChumpDumper]

One post today.

How much time on ISH?

Researching the links?

Engineering this thread?

[Brazil]

you should take it as a compliment for you tbh... you started dat , not me



for the rest dude is a young padawan it is indeed 0-4 when he takes more than 18 FGAs the or more costed him 3 in the win column

[dabom]

How much time on ISH?

Researching the links?

Engineering this thread?

Again with the questions cause you a dumbass. Dleague material if you ask me.

[Brazil]

btw most interesting of the thread in question is



now that's impressive... damn

[ChumpDumper]

Again with the questions cause you a dumbass. Dleague material if you ask me.

No one expects you to answer these simple questions.

We expect you to deflect with ad hominems and emoticons.

[dabom]

you should take it as a compliment for you tbh... you started dat , not me



for the rest dude is a young padawan it is indeed 0-4 when he takes more than 18 FGAs the or more costed him 3 in the win column

Are we losing those games cause of Kawhi? That's right got.

Pot calling the kettle black. Never seen someone point out so many things without actually standing for anything.

[dabom]

No one expects you to answer these simple questions.

We expect you to deflect with ad hominems and emoticons.

[ChumpDumper]

Just like that.

lol engineer

[dabom]

Just like that.

lol engineer

So much butthurt.

[ChumpDumper]

So much butthurt.

I agree you are so butthurt you can't even answer simple questions about your own thread you so carefully engineered.

[dabom]

I agree you are so butthurt you can't even answer simple questions about your own thread you so carefully engineered.

You shtick is to ask questions and be defensive. You proved that again today.

[ChumpDumper]

You shtick is to ask questions and be defensive. You proved that again today.

ad hominem and emoticon

You proved that again.

[dabom]

you should take it as a compliment for you tbh... you started dat , not me



for the rest dude is a young padawan it is indeed 0-4 when he takes more than 18 FGAs the or more costed him 3 in the win column

Edit I thought you were talking about the troll.

Spurs are 0-4 when Kawhi has shot more than 18 shots.

The guy was wrong.

[houston spurs fan]

btw most interesting of the thread in question is



now that's impressive... damn

Holy . And, Duncan was at Wake during these years. Think about what his stats would be if he was one and done....

[TheGreatYacht]

So the Spurs are an under .500 team when Kawhobe shows up instead of Kawhi?

The Spurs would be undefeated if Kawhi knew his role

[Brazil]

Are we losing those games cause of Kawhi? That's right got.

Pot calling the kettle black. Never seen someone point out so many things without actually standing for anything.

You made the claim about Parker costing us games because he was shooting too much when actually I gently demonstrated it was far from being true and in fact clearly the contrary...

Now I'm not stupid enough like you to blame a player taking 20 shots with a good efficiency for a loss, that's again your not mine. We can discuss about balance in the offense but only a re like you would throw some stupid takes like Parker costed us the game, he took more shots than Kawhi even when dude was having good efficiency

If you blame Parker for Spurs losses when he dominate the offense explain to me why you don't blame Kawhi for the same ?... go ahead and for the record don't shoot the messenger Spurs are 0-4 when kawhi take 18+ FGAs... deal with it

[Brazil]

Edit I thought you were talking about the troll.

Spurs are 0-4 when Kawhi has shot more than 18 shots.

The guy was wrong.

yes he was, this "or more" costed him his 0-4 tbh.. not a very good troll... I guess it is a learning curve

[LongtimeSpursFan]

'Kawhi "The Spurs are 0-4 when Kawhi takes 18 FGA or more in a game... He's talked about passing Timmy in rings, how about passing it TO Timmy instead?"' -ISH

http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/showthread.php?t=391093&page=2

As you can see in these threads where he got his trolling from

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...78#post8296578

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...=253644&page=4

And another Spurs fan corrects his dumbass.

'Technically the Spurs are 3-4 when Kawhi has attempted 18 field goals or more.'

Dam Brazil. As you can see you ain't honest if a troll is using your trolling material.

Pilipinos ain't got jobs?

[bic50]

People here are really blaming kawhi for this lose? From what I saw the bench stunk it up pretty bad.

[tonight...you]

People here are really blaming kawhi for this lose? From what I saw the bench stunk it up pretty bad.

It was definitely the bench and the team going away from Kawhi and Aldridge at the end.

[bic50]

It was definitely the bench and the team going away from Kawhi and Aldridge at the end.

Agreed