Exxon-mobile buries climate change research

[DarrinS]

I am pointing out your methodology for others. If you want to use smilies while I paint a narrative of you being untrustworthy with specific examples then have at it. I like that trade and I can still rejoin the OP through your deflection.

Note how I addressed your assertion that it was religion and then gave the specific example of empirical quantification you have been shown since the beginning? That wasn't for your sake, dumbass. Call it crying if it makes you feel better.

Frankly, my dear, no one gives a .

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Frankly, my dear, no one gives a .

If you say so.

I actually read the forum Darrin and it's obvious from your perpetual ups posting articles without reading them that I read better than you. I don't need you to tell me what the sentiment is around here.

Is there anyone here that takes you or your partner in stupidity seriously? About all you have going for you are the CN/nazi spambots. Everyone here condescends when they talk to you on these subjects or just distances themselves from you. That includes the two of you towards each other btw.

Now you only speak for yourself and it is very obvious that you don't give a . You seem to pride yourself on that and if you will recall in our talks in the past I have talked about nihilist dimwits and cowards. I don't believe you don't care because you post on this subject in the same way with minor variations over and over again actually like you were reading dogmatic scripture in the face of rebuttals. Calling us a religion first is your way around that? It's like unethical salesman slimy shill.

Disingenuous and duplicitous.

[DarrinS]

If you say so.

I actually read the forum Darrin and it's obvious from your perpetual ups posting articles without reading them that I read better than you. I don't need you to tell me what the sentiment is around here.

Is there anyone here that takes you or your partner in stupidity seriously? About all you have going for you are the CN/nazi spambots. Everyone here condescends when they talk to you on these subjects or just distances themselves from you. That includes the two of you towards each other btw.

Now you only speak for yourself and it is very obvious that you don't give a . You seem to pride yourself on that and if you will recall in our talks in the past I have talked about nihilist dimwits and cowards. I don't believe you don't care because you post on this subject in the same way with minor variations over and over again actually like you were reading dogmatic scripture in the face of rebuttals. Calling us a religion first is your way around that? It's like unethical salesman slimy shill.

Disingenuous and duplicitous.

Feel better?

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Feel better?

Sure. You going to stop?

[DarrinS]

Sure. You going to stop?

Stop what? Having my own opinion on a message board?

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Stop what? Having my own opinion on a message board?

Well for starters are you going to say anything in regards to the actuarial valuations that you've been shown repeatedly in the context of calling me and others religious zealots?

[FuzzyLumpkins]

http://www.casact.org/research/Clima...eRpt_Final.pdf

Here it is again in it's most recent iteration.

$150b annually and rising. this also doesn't cover the people without coverage who of course are just ed. Darrin says being concerned about that is just alarmism

[boutons_deux]

Much Of The World Perplexed That Climate Debate Continues In U.S.

At the U.N. climate summit in Paris, the U.S. has a big footprint. Cabinet officials scurry from meeting to meeting, trying to get a binding deal that would help some 200 countries slow the planet's warming. Yet in some ways, the United States is an outlier.

"Everybody else is taking climate change really seriously," President Obama said during his visit to Paris at the start of the summit. "They think it's a really big problem."

As the president acknowledged, he leads one of the few advanced democracies in the world where climate change is still the subject of political debate.

"You travel around Europe, and you talk to leaders of governments and the opposition, and they're arguing about a whole bunch of things. One thing they're not arguing about is whether the science of climate change is real and whether we have to do something about it," he said.

As the summit began, House Republicans in Washington were debating a bill to gut the Obama administration's clean energy plan.

"These EPA rules affect jobs, and they affect the amount of money in the pockets of moms and dads all across this great country," said South Carolina Republican Jeff Duncan.


Changing Perceptions Of U.S.

Outside of the main complex where negotiations are taking place, an area called "Climate Generations" provides a gathering place for environmental groups, civil society organizations, activists and others from around the world.

There are indigenous tribes and bicycle-powered computer chargers, groups singing hymns and people waving placards. French interpreter Claudine Pierson says she was "surprised to see how many Americans are around."

And how are they perceived?

"Like polluters, I guess," she says.

Everyone is aware that Congress is fighting Obama on carbon emissions, Pierson says, "because it was all over the newspapers."

Many people share her view of the U.S.

Yet as Republicans threaten to shut down the federal government if the U.S. delegation in Paris commits to paying too much money to developing countries to deal with the impacts of climate change, Moniz acknowledges that "certainly, certain issues require congressional action."

http://www.npr.org/2015/12/09/458930...content=202709

BigCarbon, BigCorp pay legislative s to protect their profits, plus Repugs must deny their hated n!gg@, and America, any progress, any solutions.