Reply With Quote
Like I said, it's one or the other and the smack wasn't so much about the school as it is your ability. I believe you misrepresent. Calling you duplicitous over and again should have been a clue.UTSA smack? I'm wounded.
UTSA smack? I'm wounded.
Like I said, it's one or the other and the smack wasn't so much about the school as it is your ability. I believe you misrepresent. Calling you duplicitous over and again should have been a clue.UTSA smack? I'm wounded.
lol... it's clearly workplace violence when en employee shoots up his own place of work. it just describes the location of the attack
the question i was referring to previous page was about motive. on the day of the attack, some thought it was terrorirsm, some thought it was due to workplace grievances (suspect reportedly got into some argument/dispute at work).
the workplace grievance theory isn't really supported by any other findings though. based on what i'm reading, she "pledged her allegiance" to isis but we aren't sold she was contacted back by them or specifically instructed. self-radicalized
Your internet burns are strong.
Doesn't seem like he liked his coworkers though, does it? Gotta be some reason they started there.
That the 'law school student' doesn't get mutually exclusive either is amusing.
If only we were as smart as you.
You miss the point. I don't give a what you think. I'm more interested in no one taking you seriously. I don't see anyone taking you seriously do you? Even WC stays away from agreeing with you and you guys are like two peas in a pod.Your internet burns are strong.
You really aren't too bright. I'm not here for the same reason as you dip .
coworkers have said they never had any issues with him or sensed he had issues. maybe they just thought they'd be easier targets, and familiarity with the area would be to their benefit. we dont know. i dont think the 9/11 attackers had personal vendettas with the specific people on those planes
there's going to be more info coming out as time goes by, but at this time i dont think evidence supports the grievance angle... else why would the wife be so involved?
Sure. He knew there were a decent amount of people there he could kill, he knew the building layout, he knew the room was unsecure, and he knew he'd have a good chance of making it to a getaway vehicle.
Did they all work for the airlines?
Jesus, what a failure of an analogy.
So no other reason.
Nice speculation.
That you don't get it is predictable.
The whole nation has strict laws about making and owning bombs. It didn't stop these guys.
Therefore bomb control doesn't work.
Criminals do not follow laws, therefore, laws are useless.
Beekeeper suit.
Just checking in. Has praying fixed the problem yet?
The analogy was meant to show that it's not necessarily a personal hatred and desire to kill those specific people. Maybe it was just an easier target because of familiarity of the building and area.
whining about praying isn't fixing anything either. i dont think anybody has claimed praying will fix the problem.
Weird, since that's literally the ENTIRE solution the GOP has for gun violence. Pray until it gets better. That's it.
These pedophile worshiping savages pledged allegiance to ISIS and some of you gots still can't admit that it was terrorism? Holy you're ing blind and/or stupid. Probably both.
Did you try flowers and candles ?
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions