Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 66
  1. #26
    Veteran SpursforSix's Avatar
    Post Count
    21,159
    NBA Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    I do what...I...want, what you want.

    How about the All Time Texas Longhorns 100m?

    lane

    1.Dean Smith....Olympian
    2.Tony Jones...NFL
    3.Herkie Walls...NFL
    4.Johnny Jones...Olympian/NFL
    5.Amar Johnson
    6.Jamaal Charles...NFL
    7.Jason Leach
    8.Brenden Christian

    Would ya believe that doesn't compare to Texas Southern, UTEP, TCU, Houston or Texas A&M?
    I would be shocked if Eric Metcalf doesn't make that list.

  2. #27
    Banned
    Post Count
    49,723
    NBA Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    I would be shocked if Eric Metcalf doesn't make that list.
    Eric Metcalf was a long jumper not a sprinter, just like his dad Terry who was actually a better running back. Obviously Eric had good speed but his game was more about quicks and agility. No he doesn't belong in that race, his 10.3ish way too slow.

    Check out his dad Terry.




    He was out of Long Beach State.

    Eric 's 27-8 the longest jump (NCAA) ever by an NFL player. Terry was a 25-11 jumper.

    I do get a kick out of the internet. How at first everyone tries to...."you Googled that"...ha~ Then finally they finally figure it out, yep, the real deal here, that legit know it all. Which people just can't stand, hahaha!!!!!!! Yep, human nature.
    Last edited by Avante; 11-25-2015 at 11:39 PM.

  3. #28
    Believe.
    Post Count
    24,896
    NBA Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Is that supposed to be you?
    It's you.
    I believe in creation, remember?

    Only if you see yourself in me. ?

  4. #29
    Veteran HI-FI's Avatar
    Post Count
    13,358
    NBA Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    College
    Texas Longhorns
    translation

    Wow! How do you do that? Ok, so how about the All Time TCU 100m?


    No problem little .

    All Time TCU 100m

    lane

    1.Charles Silmon
    2.Kim Collins St Kitts
    3.Darvis Patton
    4.Ray Stewart Jamaica
    5.Jon Drummond
    6.Michael Frater Jamaica
    7.Percival Spencer Jamaica
    8.Phil Epps

    All but Epps are sub10.00 sprinters, while no Big10 school in history has even one. TCU also holds the NCAA 4x1 record.
    where do you rank Mick Taylor against blues guitarists from the 70s?

  5. #30
    Banned
    Post Count
    49,723
    NBA Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    where do you rank Mick Taylor against blues guitarists from the 70s?
    Anyone who can play with John Mayall the father of British blues and the Stones belongs in a special place. Mick Taylor is right there with Eric Clapton and Peter Green in my book. Both of them also played with Mayall.

    Ya start with Lonnie Johnson in 1925 as far as blues guitarists go, with Tampa Red, Scrapper Blackwell, Robert Johnson standing out prior to the 40's, then here came T-Bone Walker and the electric guitar. Buddy Guy taking it further. Then here came the white rockers and well....ya know the rest of the story.

  6. #31
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    Post Count
    83,774
    NBA Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    College
    Texas Tech Red Raiders
    It's you.
    I believe in creation, remember?

    Only if you see yourself in me. ?
    Right, I don't believe in a great pumpkin creator until I see it. But you do. You're Linus.

  7. #32
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    Post Count
    83,774
    NBA Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    College
    Texas Tech Red Raiders
    Eric Metcalf was a long jumper not a sprinter, just like his dad Terry who was actually a better running back. Obviously Eric had good speed but his game was more about quicks and agility. No he doesn't belong in that race, his 10.3ish way too slow.

    Check out his dad Terry.




    He was out of Long Beach State.

    Eric 's 27-8 the longest jump (NCAA) ever by an NFL player. Terry was a 25-11 jumper.

    I do get a kick out of the internet. How at first everyone tries to...."you Googled that"...ha~ Then finally they finally figure it out, yep, the real deal here, that legit know it all. Which people just can't stand, hahaha!!!!!!! Yep, human nature.
    Fat ol troll doing what I tell him to do

  8. #33
    Banned
    Post Count
    49,723
    NBA Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Poor little , not a brain in his ing head.

    Surprised the dumb hasn't told me how many yards Derrick Henry is averaging per carry, hahahahahaha!!!!! Stupid ~ The idiot actually thought ..one..game, meant something, hahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Ok, while here...

    Look for Seahawks RB Thomas Rawls to..WOW!...us, the cat has some serious jets. Now smart people will give that a few weeks, idiots like this Blake freak will...see see he didn't have such a great game vs Pitt....ha~~~~~~~~~~ Too dumb to give things some time.

  9. #34
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    Location
    San Marcos
    Post Count
    51,121
    NBA Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    The definition
    Biological evolution, simply put, is descent with modification. This definition encompasses small-scale evolution (changes in gene frequency in a population from one generation to the next) and large-scale evolution (the descent of different species from a common ancestor over many generations). Evolution helps us to understand the history of life.

    The explanation
    Biological evolution is not simply a matter of change over time. Lots of things change over time: trees lose their leaves, mountain ranges rise and erode, but they aren't examples of biological evolution because they don't involve descent through genetic inheritance.

    The central idea of biological evolution is that all life on Earth shares a common ancestor, just as you and your cousins share a common grandmother.

    Through the process of descent with modification, the common ancestor of life on Earth gave rise to the fantastic diversity that we see do ented in the fossil record and around us today. Evolution means that we're all distant cousins: humans and oak trees, hummingbirds and whales.
    http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolib...e/0_0_0/evo_02

  10. #35
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    Post Count
    83,774
    NBA Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    College
    Texas Tech Red Raiders
    Recent fossil discoveries from the Carboniferous and Permian periods — around 300 million years ago — show that some other amphibian groups may have regenerated legs and tails in a way similar to salamanders, suggesting that all land mammals once carried within them the ability to regenerate limbs.

    That ability was lost through time.

    "The fossil record shows that the form of limb development of modern salamanders and the high regenerative capacities are not something salamander-specific, but instead were much more widespread and may even represent the primitive condition for all four-legged vertebrates” lead author Nadia Fröbisch*said in a release.

    “The high regenerative capacities were lost in the evolutionary history of the different tetrapod lineages, at least once, but likely multiple times independently, among them also the lineage leading to mammals.”....
    http://news.discovery.com/human/evol...mbs-151027.htm

  11. #36
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    Location
    San Marcos
    Post Count
    51,121
    NBA Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Interesting. If one could identify the genes, that would have some fascinating implications as we start editing our genome on a routine basis.

  12. #37
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    Location
    San Marcos
    Post Count
    51,121
    NBA Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Long Before Trees Overtook the Land, Earth Was Covered by Giant Mushrooms

    From around 420 to 350 million years ago, when land plants were still the relatively new kids on the evolutionary block and “the tallest trees stood just a few feet high,” giant spires of life poked from the Earth. “The ancient organism boasted trunks up to 24 feet (8 meters) high and as wide as three feet (one meter),” said National Geographic in 2007. With the help of a fossil dug up in Saudi Arabia scientists finally figured out what the giant creature was: a fungus. (We think.)

    The towering fungus spires would have stood out against a landscape scarce of such giants, said New Scientist in 2007.

    “A 6-metre fungus would be odd enough in the modern world, but at least we are used to trees quite a bit bigger,” says Boyce. “Plants at that time were a few feet tall, invertebrate animals were small, and there were no terrestrial vertebrates. This fossil would have been all the more striking in such a diminutive landscape.”
    Read more: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-...K23FSCIpBdH.99
    Give the gift of Smithsonian magazine for only $12! http://bit.ly/1cGUiGv
    Follow us: smithsonianMag on Twitter



    Pardon the size, but it seemed like a good illustration of the organism (collective?) mentioned.

  13. #38
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    Location
    San Marcos
    Post Count
    51,121
    NBA Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Read an interesting bit today about a russian family that lived in Siberia alone for 40 years:
    http://www.smithsonianmag.com/histor...ar-ii-7354256/
    when Dmitry reached manhood, that they first trapped animals for their meat and skins. Lacking guns and even bows, they could hunt only by digging traps or pursuing prey across the mountains until the animals collapsed from exhaustion. Dmitry built up astonishing endurance, and could hunt barefoot in winter, sometimes returning to the hut after several days, having slept in the open in 40 degrees of frost, a young elk across his shoulders.
    Made me rather mindful of some of the things that some evolutionary biologists have speculated about our sweat glands, and the kinds of things that a cooling system would allow for. Seems that left to our instincts that endurance running does what we evolved to do:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endura...ing_hypothesis

    Endurance running and persistence hunting[edit]
    Persistence hunting is "a form of pursuit hunting in which humans use endurance running during the midday heat to drive animals into hyperthermia and exhaustion so they can easily be killed".[2] Many question persistence hunting's plausibility when bow and arrow and other technology were so much more efficient. However, in the Early Stone Age (ESA), spears were only sharpened wood, and hominins had not begun using tools. The lack of spearheads or bows meant they could only hunt from very close range—between 6 and 10 meters.[6] Hominins thus must have developed a way to stab prey from close range without causing serious bodily harm to themselves. Persistence hunting makes killing an animal easier by first bringing it to exhaustion, so that it can no longer retaliate violently.

    Persistence hunters work by hunting in the middle of the day, when it is hottest. Hunters choose a single target prey and chase it at a speed between its trot and gallop, which is extremely inefficient for the animal. The hunter then continues pursuing over a period of hours, during which he may lose sight of the animal. In this case, the hunter must use tracks and an understanding of the animal to continue the chase. The prey eventually overheats and becomes unable to continue fleeing. , which does not overheat as quickly because of its superior thermoregulation capabilities, is then able to stab the prey while it is incapacitated and cannot attack.
    Fascinating bit that.

  14. #39
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    Location
    San Marcos
    Post Count
    51,121
    NBA Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    http://www.slate.com/articles/health...eationism.html

    Evolution Is Finally Winning Out Over Creationism
    A majority of young people endorse the scientific explanation of how humans evolved.

  15. #40
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    Post Count
    83,774
    NBA Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    College
    Texas Tech Red Raiders
    http://www.slate.com/articles/health...eationism.html

    Evolution Is Finally Winning Out Over Creationism
    A majority of young people endorse the scientific explanation of how humans evolved.
    I think we can least in part thank the internet.

    I'm thinking fifty years from now, creationism will be completely wiped out in the public school arena.

  16. #41
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    Location
    San Marcos
    Post Count
    51,121
    NBA Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    I think we can least in part thank the internet.

    I'm thinking fifty years from now, creationism will be completely wiped out in the public school arena.
    I think you underestimate the power of human stupidity. Avante may have children to pass on his unique form of lazy/stupid in that regard.

  17. #42
    my unders, my frgn whites pgardn's Avatar
    Post Count
    39,469
    NBA Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    College
    Texas Longhorns
    I think you underestimate the power of human stupidity. Avante may have children to pass on his unique form of lazy/stupid in that regard.

  18. #43
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    Post Count
    83,774
    NBA Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    College
    Texas Tech Red Raiders
    I think you underestimate the power of human stupidity. Avante may have children to pass on his unique form of lazy/stupid in that regard.
    You could be right.

    I think though with the speed at which we receive information worldwide and the developments in evolutionary science, there'll be a breaking point where even creationists will have to resign the fact that the world just isn't flat.

    And I'm not saying they won't then say God ordained evolution, I'm just saying they'll finally give up on irreducible complexity

  19. #44
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    Location
    San Marcos
    Post Count
    51,121
    NBA Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    You could be right.

    I think though with the speed at which we receive information worldwide and the developments in evolutionary science, there'll be a breaking point where even creationists will have to resign the fact that the world just isn't flat.

    And I'm not saying they won't then say God ordained evolution, I'm just saying they'll finally give up on irreducible complexity
    Faith tends to be highly evidence resistant.

    Took hundreds of years before the earth went around the sun, and even today there are certain idgits who think that science is lying about that.

  20. #45
    Veteran SpursforSix's Avatar
    Post Count
    21,159
    NBA Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    If I had a penny every time I had to say that...

  21. #46
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    Location
    San Marcos
    Post Count
    51,121
    NBA Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    If I had a penny every time I had to say that...
    (rimshot)

  22. #47
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    Location
    San Marcos
    Post Count
    51,121
    NBA Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Dinosauromorph research sheds light on dinosaur evolution

    Dinosauromorphs roamed the Earth almost 10 million years earlier than previous estimates: study
    By Torah Kachur, CBC News Posted: Dec 11, 2015 11:36 AM ET Last Updated: Dec 11, 2015 12:00 PM ET

    What are dinosauromorphs?

    They are a large class of creatures that were dinosaurs' ancestors.

    Even though they may be new to most of us, they have been known for a long time. Some of the more important fossils and even footprints have been discovered in places like Argentina, Poland and Texas. You can consider them primitive dinosaurs.

    What did these creatures look like?

    Like dinosaurs, but in a way, more lizard-like.

    But with some important distinguishing characteristics. They moved with more of a swayed gait, like the way a crocodile moves, because they didn't have ball and socket hip joints that are found in dinosaurs.

    Some of them were bipedal, walking on two legs, while others were quadrapedal.

    They tended to be smaller than the giants that dinosaurs were and also were weaker. They just didn't have the bulk that we associate with dinosaurs. So basically they were wimpy dinosaurs.

    What are the main findings of this new research?


    A new study was published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences where researchers went to Argentina to look at the timeline of the dinosauromorphs.

    There is an area in Argentina called the Chaneres formation where a treasure trove of fossils have been found. One layer of the rock there has given rise to dinosaur bones, while a deeper layer has revealed dinosauromorph fossils as well.

    What are the implications of this research?

    There are two big shifts in thought that this paper has created.

    First, this means that dinosaurs evolved a lot faster than previously thought. The transition from dinosauromorph-dominated landscape to a dinosaur world was thought to have taken over 15 million years. That was simply the difference in the age of the most recent dinosauromorph ever dated and the earliest true dinosaur dated.

    But now, the idea that it was only five million years is significant this means that dinosaurs really did hit the ground running. They obviously made a rapid rise to dominate the Earth as much, and for as long as they did.

    The biggest change that palaeontologists think allowed dinosaurs to catapult to the top of the food chain was the evolution of much more powerful hind limbs. This made them scary, fast and powerful. So all of sudden they were better hunters than anything else on the planet at the time. And, voila, the dinosaur age.

    It also changes what and how palaeontologists think about the origins of the dinosauromorphs.

    See, for as long as dinosauromorphs were dated, it was thought that they rose to prominence after the great Permian extinction event. The biggest die-off in Earth's history happened 252 million years ago. Ninety per cent of sea life and 70 per cent of terrestrial life was wiped out. This created a vacuum that it was assumed that dinosauromorphs and their ancestors were primed to fill.
    ...
    http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/di...tion-1.3359762

  23. #48
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    Location
    San Marcos
    Post Count
    51,121
    NBA Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Small fish species evolved rapidly following 1964 Alaska earthquake

    EUGENE, Ore. -- Dec. 14, 2015 -- Evolution is usually thought of as occurring over long time periods, but it also can happen quickly. Consider a tiny fish whose transformation after the 1964 Alaskan earthquake was uncovered by University of Oregon scientists and their University of Alaska collaborators.

    The fish, seawater-native threespine stickleback, in just decades experienced changes in both their genes and visible external traits such as eyes, shape, color, bone size and body armor when they adapted to survive in fresh water. The earthquake -- 9.2 on the Richter scale and second highest ever recorded -- caused geological uplift that captured marine fish in newly formed freshwater ponds on islands in Prince William Sound and the Gulf of Alaska south of Anchorage.

    The findings -- detailed in a paper available online in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences -- are important for understanding the impacts of sudden environmental change on organisms in nature, says UO biologist William Cresko, whose lab led the National Science Foundation-funded research.

    "We've now moved the timescale of the evolution of stickleback fish to decades, and it may even be sooner than that," said Cresko, who also is the UO's associate vice president for research and a member of the UO Ins ute of Ecology and Evolution. "In some of the populations that we studied we found evidence of changes in fewer than even 10 years. For the field, it indicates that evolutionary change can happen quickly, and this likely has been happening with other organisms as well."

    Survival in a new environment is not new for stickleback, a small silver-colored fish found throughout the Northern Hemisphere. A Cresko-led team, using a rapid genome-sequencing technology (RAD-seq) created at the UO with collaborator Eric Johnson, showed in 2010 how stickleback had evolved genetically to survive in fresh water after glaciers receded 13,000 years ago. For the new study, researchers asked how rapidly such adaptation could happen.

    The newly published research involved stickleback collected by University of Alaska researchers from freshwater ponds on hard-to-reach marine islands that were seismically thrust up several meters in the 1964 quake.

    RAD-seq technology again was used to study the new samples. Genetic changes were similar to those found in the earlier study, but they had occurred in less than 50 years in multiple, separate stickleback populations. Stickleback, the researchers concluded, have evolved as a species over the long haul with regions of their genomes alternatively honed for either freshwater or marine life.

    "This research perhaps opens a window on how climate change could affect all kinds of species," said Susan L. Bassham, a Cresko lab senior research associate who also was co-author of the 2010 paper. "What we've shown here is that organisms -- even vertebrates, with long generation times -- can respond very fast to environmental change.

    "And this is not just a plastic change, like becoming tan in the sun; the genome itself is being rapidly reshaped," she said. "Stickleback fish can adapt on this time scale because the species as a whole has evolved, over millions of years, a genetic bag of tricks for invading and surviving in new freshwater habitats. This hidden genetic diversity is always waiting for its chance, in the sea."

    Co-authors with Bassham and Cresko on the PNAS paper were Emily A. Lescak of UA-Anchorage and Fairbanks; Julian Catchen of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; and Ofer Gelmond, Frank A. von Hippel and Mary L. Sherbick of UA-Anchorage.

    NSF grants DEB0949053 and IOS102728 to Cresko and DEB 0919234 to von Hippel provided the primary funding for the project. National Ins utes of Health grant 1R24GM079486-01A1 and the M. J. Murdock Charitable Trust also supported Cresko.

    The 2010 study appeared in the PLOS Genetics. Earlier this year the journal named the paper as among its Top 10 articles published in its first decade. The study also was detailed in a UO news release.

    http://www.sciencecodex.com/small_fi...thquake-171800

  24. #49
    my unders, my frgn whites pgardn's Avatar
    Post Count
    39,469
    NBA Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    College
    Texas Longhorns
    Small fish species evolved rapidly following 1964 Alaska earthquake

    EUGENE, Ore. -- Dec. 14, 2015 -- Evolution is usually thought of as occurring over long time periods, but it also can happen quickly. Consider a tiny fish whose transformation after the 1964 Alaskan earthquake was uncovered by University of Oregon scientists and their University of Alaska collaborators.

    The fish, seawater-native threespine stickleback, in just decades experienced changes in both their genes and visible external traits such as eyes, shape, color, bone size and body armor when they adapted to survive in fresh water. The earthquake -- 9.2 on the Richter scale and second highest ever recorded -- caused geological uplift that captured marine fish in newly formed freshwater ponds on islands in Prince William Sound and the Gulf of Alaska south of Anchorage.

    The findings -- detailed in a paper available online in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences -- are important for understanding the impacts of sudden environmental change on organisms in nature, says UO biologist William Cresko, whose lab led the National Science Foundation-funded research.

    "We've now moved the timescale of the evolution of stickleback fish to decades, and it may even be sooner than that," said Cresko, who also is the UO's associate vice president for research and a member of the UO Ins ute of Ecology and Evolution. "In some of the populations that we studied we found evidence of changes in fewer than even 10 years. For the field, it indicates that evolutionary change can happen quickly, and this likely has been happening with other organisms as well."

    Survival in a new environment is not new for stickleback, a small silver-colored fish found throughout the Northern Hemisphere. A Cresko-led team, using a rapid genome-sequencing technology (RAD-seq) created at the UO with collaborator Eric Johnson, showed in 2010 how stickleback had evolved genetically to survive in fresh water after glaciers receded 13,000 years ago. For the new study, researchers asked how rapidly such adaptation could happen.

    The newly published research involved stickleback collected by University of Alaska researchers from freshwater ponds on hard-to-reach marine islands that were seismically thrust up several meters in the 1964 quake.

    RAD-seq technology again was used to study the new samples. Genetic changes were similar to those found in the earlier study, but they had occurred in less than 50 years in multiple, separate stickleback populations. Stickleback, the researchers concluded, have evolved as a species over the long haul with regions of their genomes alternatively honed for either freshwater or marine life.

    "This research perhaps opens a window on how climate change could affect all kinds of species," said Susan L. Bassham, a Cresko lab senior research associate who also was co-author of the 2010 paper. "What we've shown here is that organisms -- even vertebrates, with long generation times -- can respond very fast to environmental change.

    "And this is not just a plastic change, like becoming tan in the sun; the genome itself is being rapidly reshaped," she said. "Stickleback fish can adapt on this time scale because the species as a whole has evolved, over millions of years, a genetic bag of tricks for invading and surviving in new freshwater habitats. This hidden genetic diversity is always waiting for its chance, in the sea."

    Co-authors with Bassham and Cresko on the PNAS paper were Emily A. Lescak of UA-Anchorage and Fairbanks; Julian Catchen of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; and Ofer Gelmond, Frank A. von Hippel and Mary L. Sherbick of UA-Anchorage.

    NSF grants DEB0949053 and IOS102728 to Cresko and DEB 0919234 to von Hippel provided the primary funding for the project. National Ins utes of Health grant 1R24GM079486-01A1 and the M. J. Murdock Charitable Trust also supported Cresko.

    The 2010 study appeared in the PLOS Genetics. Earlier this year the journal named the paper as among its Top 10 articles published in its first decade. The study also was detailed in a UO news release.

    http://www.sciencecodex.com/small_fi...thquake-171800
    Desert Pupfish also a fascinating study as well.
    Good stuff.

  25. #50
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    Location
    San Marcos
    Post Count
    51,121
    NBA Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    How bacterial predators evolved to kill other bacteria without harming themselves

    A joint study by the labs of Dr Andrew Lovering and Prof Liz Sockett, at the Universities of Birmingham and Nottingham, has shown how predatory bacteria protect themselves from the weapons they use in their bacterial killing pathway.

    The research, published in Nature Communications, offers insights into early steps in the evolution of bacterial predators and will help to inform new ways of combatting antimicrobial resistance.

    A useful predatory bacterium called Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus eats other bacteria (including important pathogens of humans, animals and crops).

    It attacks them from inside out using enzymes (called DD-endopeptidases) that first loosen the cell walls of prey bacteria and then cause them to round up like a pufferfish, providing space as a temporary home for the predator.

    However, Bdellovibrio also have similar cell walls so why don't they fall victim of their own attack?

    The project, funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), found that the bacterium uses an ankyrin-type protein called Bd3460 as a shield. It binds to the tip of the enzyme weapons, nullifying their action until they are safely secreted out of the Bdellovibrio and into the prey bacteria.

    Dr. Andrew Lovering and Ian Cadby at the University of Birmingham determined the structure of the ankyrin protein using X-ray crystallography and found that that it attaches to two DD-endopeptidase weapons to temporarily deactivate them.

    "When I first showed this to Liz, she hit the nail on the head by describing it as a decorative "quiff" on top of the endopeptidase" said Dr Lovering. "This covers up the active site of the enzymes that are used to cut cell walls and offers protection to the Bdellovibrio until these weapons are excreted into the prey."

    Carey Lambert, Rob Till and Prof Liz Sockett at The University of Nottingham confirmed the antidote protein's use when the gene responsible for its production was deleted.

    Prof Liz Sockett said: "When the Bd3460 gene responsible for antidote production was deleted, the Bdellovibrio had no way of protecting itself from its own weapons. When it attacked harmful bacteria with its cell-wall-damaging enzymes it also felt the effects.

    "The Bdellovibrio bacteria lacking the Bd3460 gene tried to invade the bacteria but suddenly rounded up like pufferfish and couldn't complete the invasion -- the fatter predator cell could not enter the prey cell."

    This is the first paper to discover a 'self-protection' protein in predatory bacteria.

    Prof Liz Sockett added, "Most bacteria are not predatory and so understanding these mechanisms gives us a glimpse of how predation evolved. In this case it seems that the Bd3460 gene was transferred into ancestors of Bdellovibrio, probably when they were beginning to develop as predators."

    Commenting on the potential impact of the study, Dr Andrew Lovering added: "If we are to use Bdellovibrio as a therapeutic in the future, we need to understand the mechanisms underpinning prey killing and be sure that any self-protective genes couldn't be acquired by pathogens, causing resistance. Brilliantly, Liz and Carey have demonstrated this did not happen with the bd3460 antidote protein, and Ian and I showed how the mechanism works on predator enzymes only - this is a great inter-university collaboration."

    http://www.sciencecodex.com/how_bact...mselves-170901

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •