Reply With Quote
It's workplace violence because it was violence at a work function. It is not exclusive of terrorism.
Are you asking this because you are stupid or because you are disingenuous and stupid?
Mother er grabbed a Popsicle out of the freezer
It's workplace violence because it was violence at a work function. It is not exclusive of terrorism.
Are you asking this because you are stupid or because you are disingenuous and stupid?
Last edited by ChumpDumper; 12-04-2015 at 06:57 PM.
Similar to cafe violence and concert violence?
Bumping this. SB Chief of police mentioned GoPros in his first presser that night, the backed away from it the next morning. I think they have the GoPros and the footage.
Are those official classifications?
I asked you that yesterday and you shut up really quickly.
Did the FBI officially classify this as workplace violence just because it happened at a workplace?
I don't know. It looks like it can fit more than one classification. It's not like they won't count as murders and assaults if it is classified as terrorism. Or do you think that's how it works?
I see you dodged my question again so I will ask again:
Are cafe violence and concert violence official crime classifications you have seen listed anywhere before, TSA?
Everyone still comfortable with the Syrian refugee process that officials admit they have little to no data to crosscheck against? DHS and FBI screened her
Malik came to the U.S. on what is known as a “fiancé” visa, which allows an American fiancé to pe ion for his or her partner’s temporary entry before marriage. For the visa application, the address she listed in her Pakistani hometown, ABC News discovered today, does not exist. Malik received a her Green Card this summer, U.S. officials said.
http://abcnews.go.com/International/female-san-bernardino-shooter-tashfeen-malik/story?id=35589386
I'm fine with it. More coming to Texas this week.
Are you afraid of the Syrian refugees, TSA?
Yes or no.
The FBI did not classify it as workplace violence why do you continue to do so?
Of course they aren't and it's just as ridiculous for you to continue to try and say it's workplace violence because it happened at a place of work.
Is there a list?
I'll look at it if you link it.
How is it not workplace violence?Of course they aren't and it's just as ridiculous for you to continue to try and say it's workplace violence because it happened at a place of work.
It's also a terrorist act.
Why are you so stupid to not understand it can be both?
No. Still don't want them here.
What data will they cross reference when officials admitted they don't really have any beacause we don't have people on the ground there to gather information like we did in Iraq?
If your're not afraid then there is no problem.
I'm glad we settled this.
head in the sand
How is it not workplace violence, TSA?
So you are afraid of the Syrian refugees?
The same way it's not cafe or concert violence
No, and neither are you. You said you aren't, so the mater is settled.
Why do you keep bringing up your imaginary classifications?
https://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/p..._download/file
Now TSA, does this incident meet the FBI's definition of workplace violence shown as Type 3?
Yes or no.
Could you stop wasting time with Sophist RumpHumper for a moment and look at my thread regarding workplace conditions and how complaints were handled at the Center?
lol Flabbs doesn't even know what sophistry is.
You too Rumpy, I agree with you it's both UnIslamic Radical terrorism and workplace violence in the same setting.
See above Rumps. This section of this thread is one time, granted, you are not being sophist.
Otherwise your schtikk is completely predictable.
See the work thread.
WASHINGTON — The woman who, with her husband, killed 14 people in San Bernardino pledged allegiance to the Islamic State in a Facebook post the day of the attack, officials said Friday, and the F.B.I. announced it was treating the massacre as an act of terrorism.
https://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/p..._download/file
Why isn't the FBI following their own definition of workplace violence?
Who says they aren't?
They are investigating it as an act of terrorism because it fits that definition. It also fits the definition of workplace violence.
Are you all really that stupid that you can't understand a crime can fit more than one definition?
Then why hasn't the FBI classified it as an act of terrorism AND workplace violence?
Are you really this stupid?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions