Reply With Quote
It's about being specific. Technically, it does qualify as workplace violence, but it was, more specifically, a terrorist attack.
Why does this bother you?
It's like you're arguing that the attackers are mammals vs human.
Of course I did. It's a simple definition.
You tried to bring OSHA into a criminal investigation.
lol
It's about being specific. Technically, it does qualify as workplace violence, but it was, more specifically, a terrorist attack.
Why does this bother you?
It's like you're arguing that the attackers are mammals vs human.
I just think its funny that the FBI didn't pass it off to local law enforcement.
The FBI won't say until their investigation is over if any other recent high profile investigations but they have a new AG so who knows. What a mess.
Apparently Darrin doesn't understand the notion of something being many things all at the same time. Feigned? I hope so.
It doesn't bother me at all. I've been saying it's both for quite some time. Maybe a Venn diagram would help you.
No, that's what you guys are trying to do for some reason. I've been saying they are both all along.It's like you're arguing that the attackers are mammals vs human.
I really don't know what got your collective dander up.
I don't see how the FBI could not be involved form here on out. This is way beyond what the locals can handle. I'm sure more feds will get involved from here on out just to make sure.
i dont think that analogy works. terrorism isn't a subset of workplace violence in the same way humans are a subset of mammals
I fully acknowledge that this terrorist attack happened where he worked. If not for the wife's pledge to ISIS, the IED factory, the obvious planning, etc., this would probably be treated SOLELY as a workplace violence incident. Sorry you are disappointed.
Yeah, but you know what I mean.
Darrin, I'm going to ask you this question again, because you are being an especially gaping vagina tonight:
Who said this wasn't an act of terrorism, Darrin?
Please answer this question, Darrin. Prove you aren't a huge gaping vagina with a grudge who can't face a simple question.
Chump, was this muslim terrorism? Yes or no?
Yes. I've said this over and over.
Who said is wasn't?
Very good. You implied that it wasn't earlier but trying to attribute it to other factors.
Lol, chump is getting angry.
Actually that's bull .
Your inference was faulty.
I said it met the definition of workplace violence as well.
If you don't think it does, you can explain how it doesn't.
Since she was here on a Visa i get that. I was thinking about the apparent disconnect.
lol Darrin isn't answering the question.Lol, chump is getting angry.
Who said this wasn't an act of terrorism, Darrin?
All the communication and media recovery issues as well.
You tried to keep OSHA out of a workplace issue.
Lol
Awe, I see FuzzyWuzzy has posted, but I can't see the words.
Maybe Chump will be a White Knight and quote you.
Who is saying it isn't "technically" workplace violence? Answer the question.lol Darrin isn't answering the question.
Who said this wasn't an act of terrorism, Darrin?
Did I?
Show me where I did that.
Link it.
Come to think of it, honor killings are just domestic violence.
https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/workplacev...standards.html
Lol meets the "definition."
What statute or regulation did you get your definition from?
I think TSA was on that track before my simple question spooked him -- and I'm not sure about the others since they won't answer simple questions.
Who said this wasn't an act of terrorism, Darrin?
Answer the simple question, Darrin.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
