Reply With Quote
no it simply doesn't apply to you from what you said. that is his schtick and that is how darrin and a whole lot of other accounts respond to it.
i jumped to conclusions. oh my!
Well, give me what details you can.
You duck my simple questions regularly, Darrin. Just as you did tonight.
no it simply doesn't apply to you from what you said. that is his schtick and that is how darrin and a whole lot of other accounts respond to it.
i jumped to conclusions. oh my!
i never said anything about when it does or doesnt apply. you're just making up. all i said was i find it funny
Goalpost move.
I am asking you why I should refer to the Occupational Saftey and Hazard Administration for the purposes of a criminal investigation.Clarify your second question: are you asking me what relevance the Occupational Saftey and Hazard Administration has to a workplace violence issue?
Why I should refer to the Occupational Saftey and Hazard Administration for the purposes of a criminal investigation?
Choice of words.
I will delete the quote if you want me to.
Do you want me to delete the quote?
before addicts come to grips with what's on their hand (addiction) they think they're in control and are making a choice
So no details, just generalizations. I believe you are simply making this up.
You said the FBI has one. I asked for it. How is that a goalpost move?
OSHA has jurisdiction over workplace violence.
Why are you so adamant about wanting to delete it? Are you regretting your decision to parrot a ty joke?
I never said they had an official definition.
You just lied.
Do they conduct the criminal investigations? That is what we are dealing with here.OSHA has jurisdiction over workplace violence.
I am asking you directly if you want me to delete it.Why are you so adamant about wanting to delete it? Are you regretting your decision to parrot a ty joke?
You obviously have strong feelings about it.
Do you want me to delete the quote?
Yes or no.
Now we come back to the obvious mutually exclusive thing with you again and me not believing you are a lawyer.
I think you are completely unfair to your nickname. It has alliteration and rhythm and just rolls right off the tongue. when I see your account the name comes unbidden.
step 1 of the standard 12 step program is to accept that you don't have control over your addiction.
before this step, an addict believes they have control
So you never actually heard anyone say those words.
OK.
i never said that. i'm not going to give a specific name of friend/family of mine who has gotten past addiction problems
No one would ever expect you to give a name here. That's pretty strawish.
so what do you want me to say?
"somebody told me that once"
That probably would have worked better several posts ago.
a comment like that would be meaningless. you tried to get details of a conversation i've had full well knowing that nothing i say could actually be verified. so it was all a pointless exercise, and you knew it. but i'm sure you "made the choice" to have this exchange
You made the choice to make up your addict friend/family member.
you choose to think that
Are you hungry?
Nope. Do you feel a rush of empowerment when you trick someone into the response you want with your trolls?
Sense of empowerment? No...that's weird.
So then what reaction do you get?
In what instance?
Yeah you do this over your personas. Avoidance speaks in its own way.
You are bat crazy today and vague as . I only post under this name and one other that was banned from starting threads. Only have had three aliases ever. I don't have the energy to run multiple accounts at the same time. You sure get wound up easy. You should ask your husband to hold you for a while and so some spooning.
And what am I avoiding?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions