Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 30
  1. #1
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    22,886
    http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice...ings-in-the-US

    Partisan politics is the obvious answer to why Congress has for 20 years blocked the Centers for Disease Control from using public funds to study gun violence, worried that the data will be used for gun control advocacy. But even deeper is a long-running distrust between the NRA and gun control advocates about each other’s true intentions.

    One symptom of the lack of systematic study is that there is currently no common standard for tracking mass shootings. Most news reports this week, including this one, have cited crowdsourced data from two online tracking sites that rely on news reports, in conjunction with studies such as the Harvard one and an FBI report on “active shooter” situation

    The NRA rebuffs even the most minor check on guns on the idea that it’s part of a disarmament end game rather than an effort to save lives. The other side reflexively paints the gun lobby as a puppet for culpable weapons manufacturers, indeed as co-conspirators to violence, rather than as a politically active firearms safety organization.

    That means any movement on research funding will require both sides to ease up their rhetoric and open their eyes to the emerging facts.

  2. #2
    Believe. Fabbs's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Post Count
    15,577
    Q. How much money has been and will be spent in total on the Farook and Shaheed (whatever her name was) San Bernadino shootings?

    compared with

    Q. How much would it have cost to have had huge metal detectors and guards at the front of the building?

  3. #3
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    Q. How much money has been and will be spent in total on the Farook and Shaheed (whatever her name was) San Bernadino shootings?

    compared with

    Q. How much would it have cost to have had huge metal detectors and guards at the front of the building?
    How about $200B+ for the total annual cost of gun violence?

    Ban assault rifles and have mandatory buy back and destroy them all.

    Penalty for ownership of banned assault rifle: 5 years prison.

    Have buy back of hand guns (no bill of sale required, no questions asked), and destroy them all.

  4. #4
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,881
    Ban assault rifles and have mandatory buy back and destroy them all.

    Penalty for ownership of banned assault rifle: 5 years prison.
    Die in a fire got

  5. #5
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    How about $200B+ for the total annual cost of gun violence?

    Ban assault rifles and have mandatory buy back and destroy them all.

    Penalty for ownership of banned assault rifle: 5 years prison.

    Have buy back of hand guns (no bill of sale required, no questions asked), and destroy them all.
    Have buy back on 2nd amendment, and destroy it

  6. #6
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ TheSanityAnnex's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    21,376
    How about $200B+ for the total annual cost of gun violence?

    Ban assault rifles and have mandatory buy back and destroy them all.

    Penalty for ownership of banned assault rifle: 5 years prison.

    Have buy back of hand guns (no bill of sale required, no questions asked), and destroy them all.
    Say your delusional plan actually went into action, who would be left with firearms?

  7. #7
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,881
    Say your delusional plan actually went into action, who would be left with firearms?
    The police boutons trusts so much.

  8. #8
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ TheSanityAnnex's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    21,376
    The police boutons trusts so much.
    The police wouldn't need guns, everyone participated in the mandatory buyback.

  9. #9
    Old fogey Bender's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Post Count
    3,603
    The police wouldn't need guns, everyone participated in the mandatory buyback.
    yep. only a ing idiot would think that bad guys mandatory sell back their guns...

  10. #10
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    Say your delusional plan actually went into action, who would be left with firearms?
    Did I say "mandatory" for hand guns?

  11. #11
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ TheSanityAnnex's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    21,376
    Did I say "mandatory" for hand guns?
    They are responsible for 99% of murders here why wouldn't you?

    You can't even propose a well thought out delusional plan for s sake

  12. #12
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ TheSanityAnnex's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    21,376
    How about $200B+ for the total annual cost of gun violence?

    Ban assault rifles and have mandatory buy back and destroy them all.

    Penalty for ownership of banned assault rifle: 5 years prison.

    Have buy back of hand guns (no bill of sale required, no questions asked), and destroy them all.
    Under your delusional plan I'd still get to keep my ranch rifle right?

  13. #13
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    Under your delusional plan I'd still get to keep my ranch rifle right?
    you can suck whatever satisfies your sickness

  14. #14
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ TheSanityAnnex's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    21,376
    you can suck whatever satisfies your sickness
    Would I not have to turn this in under your mandatory plan?

  15. #15
    Spur-taaaa TDMVPDPOY's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    41,384
    buyback doesnt make sense when they output more guns then what is bought back...

    u need harsher laws like, u commit a crime, all 3 line of generation gets diluted in prison

  16. #16
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    Would I not have to turn this in under your mandatory plan?
    mandatory only for assault rifles

  17. #17
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ TheSanityAnnex's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    21,376
    mandatory only for assault rifles
    What makes this one any less lethal?

  18. #18
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    What makes this one any less lethal?
    I happily claim ignorance of all your dildoes

  19. #19
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    83,636
    Have buy back on 2nd amendment, and destroy it
    Fine by me

  20. #20
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,881
    What makes this one any less lethal?
    LOL turn in your scary .223 AR-15, but you can keep the 30.06 that's more dangerous in the hands of a good shooter.

  21. #21
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,881
    Should shotguns be force bought back too?
    Last edited by baseline bum; 12-05-2015 at 11:53 PM.

  22. #22
    Veteran Aztecfan03's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Post Count
    4,292
    Say your delusional plan actually went into action, who would be left with firearms?
    apparently everyone but the military since assault rifles are for the military. The ones for civilians that look similar aren't assault rifles.

  23. #23
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ TheSanityAnnex's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    21,376
    LOL turn in your scary .223 AR-15, but you can keep the 30.06 that's more dangerous in the hands of a good shooter.
    And that semi-auto Ruger ranch rifle that holds the same 30 round magazines and fires just as fast, you can keep that since it doesn't have that collapsible stock, the pistol grip, and that vertical grip thingy.

  24. #24
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    except that's not how it works. let them amend the cons ution and i'll be all for following it

  25. #25
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    I would agree with banning assault rifles, though I think Shazbot has them and assault weapons confused.

    The accepted terminology has specific meaning. The assault rifle classification is limited to "full automatic rifles" whereas assault weapons are ones that just look mean.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •