ok.
Spurs have led after 3Q in 21 of 22 games
The Spurs have led after three quarters in 21 of 22 games so far this season. The GS Warriors have led after 3Q in only 20 of 23 games.
Therefore: Spurs > GS.
FACTS HERE:
http://www.nba.com/standings/team_re...=iref:nba:gnav
![]()
Unfortunately, Warriors have led after the 4Q in 22 of 23 games vs 18 of 22 games for Spurs.
Spurs also have lead for the most minutes in the 4th, imo
check the stats
Don't know where to find that stat.
![]()
The Golden State Warriors have also led after 4 quarters in 23 of 23 games
Then they should hang the "Led in 21 of 22 games after the 3rd Quarter" banner.
Winning games while down gets you more prepare for the playoff imo. Coasting makes you weak.
They've lead in 18 out of 22 games after the final whistle, tho.
1 OT game begs to differ.
Good find by my crack staff.
![]()
Growing up watching TNT I always thought that was a kotex pad in the background of the text...
yet you have lost 4, Dubs none.
Still a lot of season left and the h2h games.
But I love how SOME Spur fans act as though Gstate has something to prove instead of the other way around. Dubs are the champs. Spurs revised their roster, Dubs stood pat mostly and are better than last year.
Spurs need to show and prove, not Dubs.
Still think spurs and Cavs only teams with shot at beating dubs in 7 though ...
EJ's "neato stats" are rarely stats at all. A shame.
The Warriors' expected record based on point differential is 20-3, vs 19-3 for the Spurs. The Warriors are better but not by the country mile that some say.
Great timing got.
Another factoid The Warriors have accomplished is not losing to scrubs.
Revenge of Cojo and Scola.
![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)