Reply With Quote
I know you're just making a joke, but it's a major challenge to keep your kids away from Internet porn, unless you're Amish.
I use a 500 GB 850 EVO. Download torrents to the HDD, they're made for storing lots of data. SSD is more for quick access of OS files, games, starting programs quickly, etc.
I know you're just making a joke, but it's a major challenge to keep your kids away from Internet porn, unless you're Amish.
Thanks man.
Just keep him off spurstalk and he'll be fine.
I'm probably about 10 years away from that problem. I don't even want to know what porn is going to be like in 2025. Duncan will probably have declined to a 16 and 8 player by then.
It'll probably be chatrooms with Romanian s who will IM him models of their pussies to 3D print and bang while chatting as long as he gives them daddy's credit card number.
Well... whatever makes him happy.
man looks like 4k system is the next thing for me...
the game les for 2016 looks awesome on a 4k monitor system...
Why are people impressed by cutscenes? And if you want to play games in 4k, better build a system like in the first post of this thread tbh.
How is the gaming performance on your son's system? I gotta say I'm pretty impressed by i3s, they're such awesome cpus for the money. A few months ago I decided I wanted to see how GTA V would play on an i3, so I disabled two cores of my Xeon and left hyperthreading on to simulate a 3.8 GHz Haswell i3. To my surprise, I was still getting mostly 60-75 fps in GTA V with it and my GTX 970 with occasional dips to around 55 fps with ultra settings at 1080p. I wasn't expecting that at all because GTA V is really demanding on the cpu. I'd imagine a 3.7 GHz Skylake i3-6100 with fast DDR4 ram is quite a bit better even. People sleep on i3s because they're dual cores, but that hyperthreading makes an enormous difference. When I went into the BIOS and turned off HT while leaving two cores off to simulate a 3.8 GHz Pentium the game became unplayable, lots of stuttering and drops into the ~25 fps range. But with the simulated i3 the game was smooth as .
Last edited by baseline bum; 12-11-2015 at 02:06 AM.
This x 1000000
I ing hate cut scenes. I was playing MK on a PS4 and the goddamn thing is a movie with some sporadic "fight" opportunities. Glad I didn't buy that .
I guess if a game has real footage scenes then the graphics are out of this world and the game must rock. It makes me wonder how I ever lived through Defender and Zaxxon.
who would have thought the story mode included a story. The towers are where it's at, this year's story was crap.
It's not that it's a story, but that you do almost nothing the entire time. Also, you have to play the story to understand what the they are talking about when you play other aspects. I skip the cut scenes now but I wanted to see each of them at least once.
In-engine cutscenes are fine, IMO.
The only time I liked cutscenes was in the NES days when you needed them to tell the story. I loved Half Life 1 for getting rid of that stupid and leaving you in control the whole time.
The way MK plays you have to have them if you want a story, but it doesn't have to be that way unless you are too ing cheap to actually upgrade the play style of the game. , Virtual Fighter play style is fine (haven't played since Sega days) and if they could mesh MK fights with scenes better it would make more sense. Somehow though you always end up on the left side of the screen before the fight starts so you know when it's about to start.
I never liked the "press this button now" game play (not sure the technical name of that style). I like to be in control of my character throughout. That was one of my issues with God of War (great game btw). I guess the free MK X is just MK with more gore and some cool stuff.
I agree as long as they aren't super compressed into pieces of that hurt the eyes
As far as story is concerned, they aren't gonna top last years tour through the first 3 games IMO.
Worst ones were Dragon Age Inquisition's cinematic 30 fps cutscenes when I'm easily running a locked 60 fps in actual gameplay. Though the load times were even worse (I played that before I had an SSD).
Speaking of MK, they are pretty ty as well. Plus the way the fight transitions directly from the cutscene in story is jarring when the res bumps up to 1080p or whatever.
I'll probably pass on that one, the highpoint of the series was MKII.
It was, but 3 and Ultimate MK3 were still great games when I was younger, plus was ing EPIC on PS1 as probably the first arcade perfect fighting game to come to console..
I didn't suggest paying to upgrade. I was referring to the game designer when I said "too ing cheap". I wouldn't give 10 ing cents for every upgrade you could offer me on MK. It's basically the same as every other MK with a different backdrop.
As far as story is concerned, they aren't gonna top last years tour through the first 3 games IMO.
The first two releases were epic. Now it's just all magic with almost no fighting.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions