Reply With Quote
^
San Antonio is so confident that we are getting the Raiders that they are already holding cheerleader tryouts.
^
San Antonio is so confident that we are getting the Raiders that they are already holding cheerleader tryouts.
So when are the owners voting?
From FOX-2 St. Louis sports anchor
LOL
Who knows what these greedy es are going to do.
20 minutes ago:
NFL Committee Recommends Carson Plan Over Stan Kroenke’s Inglewood Stadium (With Updates)
So is Jones gift wrapping the Raiders to SA? I would say that STL might win them, but it would be an interesting year to say the least.
Not a chance. This Rams + Chargers to LA plan Jones is pushing is supposed to come with a big fat check to Davis to help build a stadium in Oakland.
If the NFL was practical they'd use the relocation fees to build the other stadium. But they're gna try to suck a city dry. Oakland is broke
Welp, the Chargers now.
Guess it's official now...
"NFL Owners vote to relocate the Rams to Inglewood, CA and give the Chargers option to join Rams"
Wow, I'm surprised to see the Rams' proposal get accepted without the Chargers.
Time for the Raiders to move to Ferguson now?
Here it comes....they're already ing about it on the NFL Network.
It's not fair
league is giving the raiders $ as compensation to help build a new stadium... still not sure if thats even enough to turn the tide in oakland. i think davis will look towards san antonio next, but i doubt anything like that gets done this year
On ESPN it said the Chargers have until January 16, 2017 to come to terms with the Rams on a lease, with the Raiders getting that option if the Chargers decline. That's gotta suck for the Chargers and Raiders to not get concessions in LA, but still, how can the Chargers not move to get that fat LA local TV deal?
i hope Spanos is stubborn enough to not take it
realistically i dont think 100m is enough to turn the tables in oakland, they're still totally in flux and probably are just gna pull another 1 year lease in that hole
Wow.
UCLA
Rams
USC
Chargers
No ..city...compares to that.
I'm really shocked the NFL didn't force the Rams to partner up with the Chargers, they badly wanted two teams in LA.
Me too, since no way they're staying in San Diego with two teams in LA. San Antonio might start looking pretty good.i hope Spanos is stubborn enough to not take it
Where are you getting the $100 million figure from?
Spanos choking again
Won't even commit to keeping the team in SD for 2016.
"My first option is San Diego"
multiple sauces
I mean, no way I want to play in SD, STL or OAK this season. The Raiders probably stay put, but if you can leave, you do it and avoid the lame-duck status. I am wondering if St. Louis has much of a chance to pick up the Raiders or Chargers. On one hand, they have a stadium proposal. On the other hand, the NFL let the Rams leave specifically because they didn't believe St. Louis was profitable. So how can they try to force Oakland to go there? But it also seems obvious that the owners respect Jerry's opinion, as he has brokered a couple of big compromises over the recent years. Will they go against him and let another team move into Texas? But if not, will they screw Davis out of having a viable market? Will London come into play at all? Just fascinating.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
