Reply With Quote
1 game sample size. Good luck with that got.
tony doesn't have the legs anymore got. Get that through your ing head.
People are deluded if they think we're beating the Warriors, or even the Clippers and Thunder with a two man attack (Kawhi + LMA) that relegates everyone else to a role player.
Every elite team has a better offensive 1-2 punch than us. Curry + Klay, Lebron + Kyrie, Blake + Paul, Durant + Westbrook. It could even be argued we have the weakest "Big 3" of the elite teams. We aren't winning jack if Tony is relegated to a 9-10ppg role player who just "Gibs the bawl to Kiwi."
If Manu and Duncan were 5 years younger, by all means, Tony should be relegated. But like it or not, he's our 3rd best offensive player and he NEEDS to be a threat. This is basically Kawhi's rookie season as "the guy." He hasn't peaked yet offensively. Like other elite offensive players (most of whom were the offensive guy their first day in the league), it took them 2-3 years to really become that guy who can carry a team on their shoulders. Kawhi isn't there yet, and is probably a season or two off from hitting his offensive peak. LMA's been great, but that 33% shooting in last year's playoffs will be a worry. We need a 3rd guy who is a threat to drop 15-20 points somewhat consistently, and the only player really capable of that is Tony (when healthy).
And no, this ain't about re ed crew feuds. Kawhi is still the best overall player on this team, but he's going to need 2 or 3 guns by his side if we're to win this thing. Kawhi isn't just at the offensive level where he can average 30-35 points over a playoff series and make up the difference for teammates under-performing. Curry, Lebron, Durant and Westbrook are all at that level.
1 game sample size. Good luck with that got.
tony doesn't have the legs anymore got. Get that through your ing head.
impossibru
The weak-minded resort to insults when they have no argument. There are clearly other games this year that required more scoring by TP to get the win.1 game sample size. Good luck with that got.
tony doesn't have the legs anymore got. Get that through your ing head.
Would you have rather lost tonight in pursuit of your agenda, or are you happy with the win and how the Spurs got there?
on a back to back against good bigs1 game sample size. Good luck with that got.
tony doesn't have the legs anymore got. Get that through your ing head.
B-B-But dat Patty Mills looking more and more like Gary Neal by the day.1 game sample size. Good luck with that got.
tony doesn't have the legs anymore got. Get that through your ing head.
Bottom 5 poster of all time.
dabom meltdown in progress.
Op is one of the best minds on here, tbh
"Gib the bawl to Kiwi1 game sample size. Good luck with that got.
tony doesn't have the legs anymore got. Get that through your ing head.
Did you not see my tony appreciation thread. Loved this game. OP is taking it overboard like usual. Low IQ posters.
Parker must have ed Dafakengineers mom.
Never seen someone so salty that their "favorite team" won.
Daboom goes the dynamite!1 game sample size. Good luck with that got.
tony doesn't have the legs anymore got. Get that through your ing head.
I cant figure out if this person is real. Surely no one is this re ed.1 game sample size. Good luck with that got.
tony doesn't have the legs anymore got. Get that through your ing head.
Nah, Kawhi is my second favorite Spur, but these re s who think we're winning anything with Parker reduced to Derek Fisher are massively stupid.
"
Lol.
And Tim Duncan and Manu do? Who exactly is going to fill that role as the 3rd threat? Patty Mills, Danny Green, a raw Simmons?
They don't have to like it, I don't even really like it, but we have to live or die with Tony as number 3.
Ball movement got. Manu and Tim and Diaw and Patty will be that 3rd best scorer at other times with Tony. You suggesting Tony be the 3rd all the time is ing re ed.Nah, Kawhi is my second favorite Spur, but these re s who think we're winning anything with Parker reduced to Derek Fisher are massively stupid.
"
Lol.
And Tim Duncan and Manu do? Who exactly is going to fill that role as the 3rd threat? Patty Mills, Danny Green, a raw Simmons?
They don't have to like it, I don't even really like it, but we have to live or die with Tony as number 3.
dabom is really hurting tonight.
An aggressive Tony is essential to the success of the Spurs. It's the best way to get the easiest and most efficient shots. LMA and Kawhi can't initiate the offense like Tony or Manu.
"Muh beautiful game."Ball movement got. Manu and Tim and Diaw and Patty will be that 3rd best scorer at other times with Tony. You suggesting Tony be the 3rd all the time is ing re ed.
This proves how stupid you are. Manu, Patty and Boris see most of their minutes with the second unit. The starters have to play a grind-it-out half court, defensive game due to their personnel, and in a half-court set, point guard scoring (or point guard's generating the offense off the PnR) is a big plus to have.
Unless you advocate Boris, Manu, and Patty playing with the starters more, in which case the defense would be
Just stop posting.
Rk Player Age G GS MP FG FGA ▾ FG% 3P 3PA 3P% 2P 2PA 2P% eFG% FT FTA FT% ORB DRB TRB AST STL BLK TOV PF PTS 1 Kawhi Leonard 23 7 7 250 52 109 .477 11 26 .423 41 83 .494 .528 27 35 .771 13 39 52 18 8 4 15 18 142 2 Tony Parker 32 7 7 210 33 91 .363 0 9 .000 33 82 .402 .363 10 17 .588 4 19 23 25 2 0 11 14 76 3 Tim Duncan 38 7 7 250 53 90 .589 0 1 .000 53 89 .596 .589 19 34 .559 19 59 78 23 9 10 7 26 125 4 Boris Diaw 32 7 0 198 34 71 .479 4 18 .222 30 53 .566 .507 9 13 .692 13 30 43 25 5 3 9 24 81
How was Tony last year in the playoffs as the 2nd/3rd most FGs? gots. /thread
Thread is specifically about Tony this season.
Now that LMA is going to be fed in the playoffs, less shots in that starting lineup and we know Tim is always money in the playoffs. That's our top 3 scorers in a close series.
Last year
Rk Player Age G GS MP FG FGA ▾ FG% 3P 3PA 3P% 2P 2PA 2P% eFG% FT FTA FT% ORB DRB TRB AST STL BLK TOV PF PTS 1 Kawhi Leonard 23 7 7 250 52 109 .477 11 26 .423 41 83 .494 .528 27 35 .771 13 39 52 18 8 4 15 18 142 2 Tony Parker 32 7 7 210 33 91 .363 0 9 .000 33 82 .402 .363 10 17 .588 4 19 23 25 2 0 11 14 76 3 Tim Duncan 38 7 7 250 53 90 .589 0 1 .000 53 89 .596 .589 19 34 .559 19 59 78 23 9 10 7 26 125 4 Boris Diaw 32 7 0 198 34 71 .479 4 18 .222 30 53 .566 .507 9 13 .692 13 30 43 25 5 3 9 24 81
How was Tony last year in the playoffs as the 2nd/3rd most FGs? gots. /thread
That said, if Duncan has the legs, he's should be the usual number 3, but we can't always count on a 40 year old for that, and against certain teams, Tony being the number 3 will be a better matchup decision.
This all boils down to "Gib the bawl to Kiwi
As ElNono said, tony wasn't injured last playoffs or else he wouldn't have played in the Euros or whatever the it was. Tony healthy didn't pull through you got cucks.
I'm tired debating with low IQ posters in this forum.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
