I'm behind Parker

[dabom]

Nice trick dabom. Instead of taking the loss like fkla you just redefine "role player" Tony to be a guy who runs the offense and can lead the team in scoring every third game or so. Definitely prigoni like play.

I don't know, though, I see vintage Parker more than prigoni. Maybe you are just wrong

I even made a Tony Appreciation thread in 2014. I'm a Tony fan. Don't like Enrique though. I've always wanted a lesser role for Tony. I'm glad he is doing it now.

[dabom]

It's really a simple question. No need to meltdown.

From your thread: "Can we waive tony and spread the contract over a larger time?"

I can always tell you were wrong when you always changing your question when one doesn't work. Hold this L.

[ChumpDumper]

I can always tell you were wrong when you always changing your question when one doesn't work. Hold this L.

It's the exact same question; that's why it's easy to repeat it when you try to dodge it:

From your thread: "Can we waive tony and spread the contract over a larger time?"

Only way I see the spurs in contention next couple of years. We need that cap space for NBA players. Highest paid player to do absolutely . I wish I was joking when I said that.

So you didn't think it was the only way and you were joking?

[dabom]

I said we can't contend with Tony doing absolutely . Which part don't agree with got?

I can always tell you were wrong when you always changing your question when one doesn't work. Hold this L.

[ChumpDumper]

It's the exact same question I have been asking you all along. You've tried all along to avoid answering it and are desperately trying to answer a question no one asked:

From your thread: "Can we waive tony and spread the contract over a larger time?"

Only way I see the spurs in contention next couple of years. We need that cap space for NBA players. Highest paid player to do absolutely . I wish I was joking when I said that.

So you didn't think it was the only way and you were joking?

[dabom]

Let me move the sentence around So you understand better.

"Only way I see the spurs in contention next couple of years. We need that cap space for NBA players. Highest paid player to do absolutely . I wish I was joking when I said that."

"Highest paid player to do absolutely . Only way I see the spurs in contention next couple of years."


Spurs don't contend with Tony doing absolutely .

[ChumpDumper]

Let me move the sentence around So you understand better.

"Only way I see the spurs in contention next couple of years. We need that cap space for NBA players. Highest paid player to do absolutely . I wish I was joking when I said that."

"Highest paid player to do absolutely . Only way I see the spurs in contention next couple of years."


Spurs don't contend with Tony doing absolutely .

Why would you completely leave out the topic of your thread?


From your thread: "Can we waive tony and spread the contract over a larger time?"

Only way I see the spurs in contention next couple of years. We need that cap space for NBA players. Highest paid player to do absolutely . I wish I was joking when I said that.

So you didn't think it was the only way and you were joking?

[dabom]

Why would you completely leave out the topic of your thread?


From your thread: "Can we waive tony and spread the contract over a larger time?"

"Can we waive tony and spread the contract over a larger time? Highest paid player to do absolutely . Only way I see the spurs in contention next couple of years."

It's the same thing got.


Spurs don't contend with Tony doing absolutely .

[dabom]

Hold this L got while you backtrack.

[ChumpDumper]

"Can we waive tony and spread the contract over a larger time? Highest paid player to do absolutely . Only way I see the spurs in contention next couple of years."

It's the same thing got.


Spurs don't contend with Tony doing absolutely .

The only way you saw the Spurs contending was waiving Tony.

Your words.

[ChumpDumper]

lol trying to reverse engineer your own sentences.

[dabom]

The only way you saw the Spurs contending was waiving Tony while he doing absolutely

Your words.

Don't omit things got.

[ChumpDumper]

Don't omit things got.

You tried to omit the topic of your thread.

[Silver&Black]

Great job OP

Always a spot open for you in the Diaw 2.0 Player Fan Krew....you just need apply.

[dabom]

You tried to omit the topic of your thread.

Hold this L chump.

[ChumpDumper]

Hold this L chump.

Why can't you just admit you were completely wrong?

You're wrong quite a bit -- should be used to it by now.

[ChumpDumper]

From your thread: "Can we waive tony and spread the contract over a larger time?"

Only way I see the spurs in contention next couple of years. We need that cap space for NBA players. Highest paid player to do absolutely . I wish I was joking when I said that.

So you didn't think it was the only way and you were joking?

[dabom]

Why can't you just admit you were completely wrong?

You're wrong quite a bit -- should be used to it by now.

I don't even know why you try to start with me. You haven't been right on anything. We just need RobDiaz to call you a got and laugh at you.

[dabom]

From your thread: "Can we waive tony and spread the contract over a larger time?"

Trying this again after you confirmed I replied.

[ChumpDumper]

I don't even know why you try to start with me. You haven't been right on anything. We just need RobDiaz to call you a got and laugh at you.

Geez, now you're explicitly begging for help.

From your thread: "Can we waive tony and spread the contract over a larger time?"

Only way I see the spurs in contention next couple of years. We need that cap space for NBA players. Highest paid player to do absolutely . I wish I was joking when I said that.

So you didn't think it was the only way and you were joking?

[dabom]

"Can we waive tony and spread the contract over a larger time? Highest paid player to do absolutely . Only way I see the spurs in contention next couple of years."

It's the same thing got.


Spurs don't contend with Tony doing absolutely .

Hold this L got while you backtrack.

[ChumpDumper]

Trying this again after you confirmed I replied.

You didn't answer my question at all. You tried to change what you posted. The actual post is below. Please answer for what you actually wrote:

From your thread: "Can we waive tony and spread the contract over a larger time?"

Only way I see the spurs in contention next couple of years. We need that cap space for NBA players. Highest paid player to do absolutely . I wish I was joking when I said that.

So you didn't think it was the only way and you were joking?

[dabom]

You even backtracked. So gold.

[ChumpDumper]

Same question, never answered by you.

From your thread: "Can we waive tony and spread the contract over a larger time?"

Only way I see the spurs in contention next couple of years. We need that cap space for NBA players. Highest paid player to do absolutely . I wish I was joking when I said that.

So you didn't think it was the only way and you were joking?

[spurraider21]

You were wrong.

All of you.

Just take the L.

pretty sure he's aware. he made this thread, after all