Xbox moves appearing on the forum now...
Lebron !!!
ing Diva ..... ain't nobody got time for that !!!
Xbox moves appearing on the forum now...
As usual, that's good solid basketball talk. The rest of the speculation is pretty touchy-feely, and I can't disagree with anything you said, functionally. Absolutely agree that Pop would have tailored a system around LeBron's unique skill set, and it wouldn't look like this Spurs team.
Still, some of LeBron's antics over the years have been pretty detrimental to a team approach. I have a hard time imagining Pop flexing that far. You think about all those seasons when LeBron was clearly the best player in the game - played like the best player in the game - and somehow couldn't ring unless he had other name-brand stars around him. I think Pop would have seen potential for the team to be better, if Bron changed his approach at least a little. And I think he would have a problem with anything that got in the way of the bigger picture.
Your take is a lot more defensible than mine.
We can't compare Manu's personality and his concept of the game/team to LeBron's. Manu wouldn't have changed a particular designed play by his coach to close a game, making it public like LeBron did.
Steel sharpens steel. If Lebron was in SA, he'd have the mentor and leadership to steer him away from the shenanigans.
There are several scenarios that the thread le can mean:
- What if the Spurs had the #1 pick in 2003 and drafted LeBron, adding him to the defending champs
- What if we clone 2003 Pop and have him be the coach of the Cavs starting in 2003-2004
- What if Pop left the Spurs in 2003 (right after a le lol) and went to coach the Cavs
- What if the Spurs traded Duncan for LeBron in 2003
- What if the Spurs traded a large portion of the team, but not Duncan, for LeBron in 2003
etc.
All have different answers. LeBron joining Duncan under Pop would have either been a league-killing combo for 10+ years, or LeBron's me-first at ude causes him to leave or demand a trade along the way imo.
I wish I had a witty reply. You could be right. I remember that he was already a seasoned media- by the time he first suited up for Cleveland. He was making more in endorsements as a rookie than a lot of players make in their career. We're talking about the irresistible force meets the immovable object. I guess SA/Pop is the only chance of steering him away from his antics, but I've still got my doubts about it.
Lebron has basically played for a series of nonen y coaches from Cleveland to Miami and back to Cleveland.
He has never complained the way some stars have in similar situations (e.g., Magic Johnson about Paul Westhead).
Off-court persona aside, Lebron plays a Spurs-like game -- he passes and makes his teammates better.
Pop and Lebron would get along just fine.
He wouldn't be the stoic presence that Kawhi or Tim is, but that could be good for SA. If this team ever starts losing, no one will watch them. They'll be worse ratings wise than the Timberwolves.
I saw this as subtle trolling by ESPN to elevate Lebron. What if Lebron was coached by Pop? How about, what if Tim Duncan were coached by Pop?
5 rings that's what.
It's irrational to think that Pop + Lebron sans TD would have had the same or better results. So, this counter-factual is like fantasizing about what if you had a Mustang when you already own a Bentley.
Relative to his talent and impact, Lebron has under-ringed and will likely end up his career as such..the 2010/2011 chips were easily his les to lose if he had HOF coaching and couple good role players on his team..
If Le Bron had had an Aldridge or West moment and decided to move to SA instead of Miami, I think he is man enough to live up to that commitment. Similarly, I think Pop would have initiated that moment like he did with LMA and given LeBron assurances that his talents and skills would be appreciated and worked INTO THE SYSTEM.
However, the deal would have been cancelled by Commissioner Stern as an unfair change of the compe ive balance of the game.
Good luck to POP surviving his coach-killing talent at the first sign of adversity..They would win some, but there is no way Pop put up with that much power Lebron invest in himself..
Trade time... LeBron for Aldridge!!!!
Seems to me Nate was fired as well.
There is no doubt that Pop has evolved and adapted around his players and staff as needed, successful coaches must do this. However, I am sure he has a few core values that are foundational to all the generations of teams he has coached. I know at least one if them is to "Get over yourself". A player like like LeBron would of had to accept real mentoring and some in your face coaching without taking it personally. History shows that those who like or need to have an entourage full of yes men and brown nosers, don't get over themselves naturally.
Cant you see LeBron going above Pop's head to the VP of Basketball Operations to get rid of Pop? WOW that would be a thing of beauty to watch. Bron telling VP Popovich, that coach Pop had to go. LOL
Now for a serious question. Had we ended up with DeMarcus Cousins, would he be as angry about team play or would he be a 20 10 3 3 player for Pop that follows his instructions? Pop has a way to control almost all the players who come to SA. Play the game right and you win. Play it wrong or create a problem and you are gone. Pop took TP and made him a star, who's to say DC could be tamed to play next to Timmy.
This. Or le would get him fired. Spurs don't do thugs, except danny in da club green
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)