Police in Germany covering up crime committed by "refugees"

[Winehole23]

did you know women were legally chattels in Texas until the early 1970s?

could not sign a contract, lease, or loan without a man countersigning. could not open a bank account or buy a car.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

that view isn't peculiar to Islam.

Ins utionally today it is. Texas was one of the last to change in the US around 50 years ago but the first real advances happened at the turn of the century. The US was far behind Europe similarly with slavery.

You can always find a misogynist but equal protection and freedom has been the ins utional ethic of the liberal west for hundreds of years.

The West hasn't seen anything like Sharia laws since the 19th century. The reformation is what it is. The old Ottoman states were still ins utionally jihading when Susan Anthony was winning the fight for the right to vote. The madrassas remain the basis for Eastern education.

I see very little ethic for reform in Islam here or abroad.

[ChumpDumper]

The continuous dodge sinks your initial spin claim.

You changed your question; trumps everything. Doesn't change your initial lie.

[DarrinS]

did you know women were legally chattels in Texas until the early 1970s?

could not sign a contract, lease, or loan without a man countersigning. could not open a bank account or buy a car.

Yeah, it's not 1970

[TheSanityAnnex]

that view isn't peculiar to Islam.

Presently? Sure it is.

[TheSanityAnnex]

You changed your question; trumps everything. Doesn't change your initial lie.

Dodge #8


I already admitted my error and moved past that. Back to my question about the article.

What things are the police afraid of talking about in the context of the immigration debate?

[ChumpDumper]

Dodge #8


I already admitted my error and moved past that. Back to my question about the article.

What things are the police afraid of talking about in the context of the immigration debate?

Doesn't matter if they are afraid or not. Their policy is their policy. You can backtrack and change your question as much as you want, but you can't change the facts.

No dodging at all.

[MultiTroll]

Dodge #8


I already admitted my error and moved past that. Back to my question about the article.

What things are the police afraid of talking about in the context of the immigration debate?

Chumps response^^^.
SanityAnnex maybe you can let Chump know he won't literally die.

[ChumpDumper]

lol Fabbs really trying to make friends.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Doesn't matter if they are afraid or not. Their policy is their policy. You can backtrack and change your question as much as you want, but you can't change the facts.

No dodging at all.

Dodge #9

I didn't ask you whether it mattered if they were afraid, I asked you what things they were afraid of talking about in the context of the immigration debate.

You are being a real about answering a direct question.

[ChumpDumper]

Dodge #9

I didn't ask you whether it mattered if they were afraid, I asked you what things they were afraid of talking about in the context of the immigration debate.

You are being a real about answering a direct question.

Sorry, I just won't let you get away with changing your question.

You backtracked and you're done.

It's OK. Apology accepted.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Sorry, I just won't let you get away with changing your question.

You backtracked and you're done.

It's OK. Apology accepted.

Dodge #10

Ok, answer the original question.

In your opinion, what is he saying the police are afraid of talking about?
“There are police employees that are afraid of talking about these things in the context of the immigration debate today,” he said. (Varg Gyllander, a spokesperson for Stockholm police)

[MultiTroll]

Dodge #9

I didn't ask you whether it mattered if they were afraid, I asked you what things they were afraid of talking about in the context of the immigration debate.

You are being a real about answering a direct question.

Sophist Chump about to hit double digits.

[ChumpDumper]

Dodge #10

Ok, answer the original question.

In your opinion, what is he saying the police are afraid of talking about?
“There are police employees that are afraid of talking about these things in the context of the immigration debate today,” he said. (Varg Gyllander, a spokesperson for Stockholm police)

Sorry, you can't backtrack over the backtrack.

It's over. Apology accepted.

Sophist Chump about to hit double digits.

You still don't know that "sophist" means -- maybe your new bestie can take a break from backtracking and tell you.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Sorry, you can't backtrack over the backtrack.

It's over. Apology accepted.

Dodge #11

Stop being a . Why are you afraid to answer the question?

[MultiTroll]

Sorry, you can't backtrack over the backtrack.

It's over. Apology accepted.

You still don't know that "sophist" means -- maybe your new bestie can take a break from backtracking and tell you.

Sophist Chump with the double double. How many is that for your "career"?

Not sure what you are fabricating with your "I don't know what Sophist means." dodge.

[ChumpDumper]

Dodge #11

Stop being a . Why are you afraid to answer the question?

It was never an issue I raised. You ed up -- I pointed it out. You declared victory for a couple of days until you actually figured out I was right and you were wrong. You finally admitted that and that is where it should have stopped -- but you can't let it go so you tried to change what was actually being discussed.

Sorry, you should be able to live with just being wrong. I'm not here to enable you.

[ChumpDumper]

Sophist Chump with the double double. How many is that for your "career"?

Not sure what you are fabricating with your "I don't know what Sophist means." dodge.

Either that or you don't realize it doesn't apply here at all.

Which is it?

Either way, you look pretty ignorant.

[TheSanityAnnex]

It was never an issue I raised.

and that matters how? I asked you a direct question which relates to the thread you are in, you dodged it #11 times, the very definition of being a .

[ChumpDumper]

and that matters how? I asked you a direct question which relates to the thread you are in, you dodged it #11 times, the very definition of being a .

I made my point. You finally accepted it and you're more than a little embarrassed that you were so wrong on such a simple matter. Now you're trying to act like you weren't wrong in the first place.

Stop while you are behind.

[TheSanityAnnex]

I made my point. You finally accepted it and you're more than a little embarrassed that you were so wrong on such a simple matter. Now you're trying to act like you weren't wrong in the first place.

Stop while you are behind.

You've made it your point to be a . If you no longer want to discuss the topic of the thread you are in I'd suggest you just leave. If you still want to discuss the topic of the thread you are in let's continue.

I am well aware you never made this an issue, but in your opinion, what is he saying the police are afraid of talking about?
“There are police employees that are afraid of talking about these things in the context of the immigration debate today,” he said. (Varg Gyllander, a spokesperson for Stockholm police)

[ChumpDumper]

You've made it your point to be a .

I made my point because you were wrong.

If you no longer want to discuss the topic of the thread you are in I'd suggest you just leave. If you still want to discuss the topic of the thread you are in let's continue.

lol it's cute when you try to be butch.

You were wrong. I'm gloating. You're pissed.

[TheSanityAnnex]

I made my point because you were wrong.lol it's cute when you try to be butch.

You were wrong. I'm gloating. You're pissed.

I was wrong and admitted it days ago. You live a sad life if you are still gloating.

I'm not pissed at all, it's fun watching you cower and dodge a question 12 times. It's obvious why you won't answer though. Your refusal to answer is very similar to the police cover up. You simply are a sexual assault sympathizer.

I am well aware you never made this an issue, but in your opinion, what is he saying the police are afraid of talking about?
“There are police employees that are afraid of talking about these things in the context of the immigration debate today,” he said. (Varg Gyllander, a spokesperson for Stockholm police)

[ChumpDumper]

lol the only reason you are backtracking and repeating your changed question is because you are butthurt that I showed how wrong you were so easily after you tried to gloat for a few days. It's really the only reason you are still posting here, and you have the gall to call me sad.

lol

[TheSanityAnnex]

lol the only reason you are backtracking and repeating your changed question is because you are butthurt that I showed how wrong you were so easily after you tried to gloat for a few days. It's really the only reason you are still posting here, and you have the gall to call me sad.

lol

I am well aware you never made this an issue, but in your opinion, what is he saying the police are afraid of talking about? “There are police employees that are afraid of talking about these things in the context of the immigration debate today,” he said. (Varg Gyllander, a spokesperson for Stockholm police)