Bulls: MVPau

[spursistan]

"It takes 10 men to win a basketball game."

- Mitch

I've already shown that Duncan plays much better in repeat attempts/campaigns than Kirby. In fact, Duncan's performances are typically better in a repeat attempt year than they are in a le winning year ('03 excluded).

This was as true as recent as last season when Duncan averaged 18, 11, 3 on 59% shooting against the best frontline in basketball in the first round that culminated with a 27 and 11 on 69% shooting in a road game 7, at age 39

Facts, they are stubborn things.

It is always Duncan sidekicks (including Parker or Manu) who the bed or get injured in the "repeat year" post 2000..Timmy always goes out with legendary performance in elimination game..Game 7 vs Mavs, Game 5 triple double vs the Lakers in 2008 and last year G7 etc..

[Mitch]

"It takes 10 men to win a basketball game."

- Mitch

I've already shown that Duncan plays much better in repeat attempts/campaigns than Kirby. In fact, Duncan's performances are typically better in a repeat attempt year than they are in a le winning year ('03 excluded).

This was as true as recent as last season when Duncan averaged 18, 11, 3 on 59% shooting against the best frontline in basketball in the first round that culminated with a 27 and 11 on 69% shooting in a road game 7, at age 39

Facts, they are stubborn things.

Kobe & Laker in your mouth again, pulpy? It's like you can't live without mentioning them every hour

Distractions and petty spin attempts aside, the only thing that matters is a le and that is a fact. Repeats means you were able to validate your championship, Duncan couldn't do it and he failed our country on top of that.

Also, when you quote someone make sure to do it correctly pulpy. Although I suspect you're just shill like fathands.

[midnightpulp]

Kobe & Laker in your mouth again, pulpy? It's like you can't live without mentioning them every hour

Distractions and petty spin attempts aside, the only thing that matters is a le and that is a fact. Repeats means you were able to validate your championship, Duncan couldn't do it and he failed our country on top of that.

Also, when you quote someone make sure to do it correctly pulpy. Although I suspect you're just shill like fathands.

Mad because you know I'm right.

I didn't misquote you:

"It takes ten men to play ball."

Meaning, it takes a combined team effort to succeed in team sports.

Citing team accomplishments in player vs. player debates
Stuck in the 80's, just like your favorite franchise
Mad

Log into Toht and blow off some team. Here, this should get your mad juices flowing a bit more:

[Mitch]

Mad because you know I'm right.

I didn't misquote you:

"It takes ten men to play ball."

Meaning, it takes a combined team effort to succeed in team sports.

Citing team accomplishments in player vs. player debates
Stuck in the 80's, just like your favorite franchise
Mad

Log into Toht and blow off some team. Here, this should get your mad juices flowing a bit more:

What happened, pulpy? Struck a nerve?

Jordan repeated, Magic repeated, Shaq repeated - they're considered among the greatest. Duncan... well, he earned a 7-10 spot

Maybe if he could repeat he'd have stepped over Shaq & Hakeem

also i dont own an account named toht, only used this guy for near 2 years now.

[midnightpulp]

What happened, pulpy? Struck a nerve?

Jordan repeated, Magic repeated, Shaq repeated - they're considered among the greatest. Duncan... well, he earned a 7-10 spot

Maybe if he could repeat he'd have stepped over Shaq & Hakeem

also i dont own an account named toht, only used this guy for near 2 years now.

Championships are team accomplishments and repeats aren't even accomplishments. Join us in the modern era, bro. Even though the Lakers can't, doesn't mean you can't.

[Mitch]

Championships are team accomplishments and repeats aren't even accomplishments. Join us in the modern era, bro. Even though the Lakers can't, doesn't mean you can't.

If I had a nickle for every time you had Kobe, Laker or Gasol in your mouth, I could retire early

There's no breaking down repeats, pulpy. The team of every era for the last several decades have had a repeat

80s - Lakers era x5, 1 repeat
90s - Bulls era x6, 4 repeats
00s - Lakers era x4 2 repeats*
10s so far - Heat x 2, 1 repeat

* - denotes third repeat into next era

That's it and that's all, Pulpy. You can whack off to some metric stats all you want and bring up Lakers/Kobe a few more times ( owning a Laker troll as a spur fan and probably owning a magic johnson one as well), it doesn't change the standings.

[midnightpulp]

If I had a nickle for every time you had Kobe, Laker or Gasol in your mouth, I could retire early

There's no breaking down repeats, pulpy. The team of every era for the last several decades have had a repeat

80s - Lakers era x5, 1 repeat
90s - Bulls era x6, 4 repeats
00s - Lakers era x4 2 repeats*

* - denotes third repeat into next era

That's it and that's all, Pulpy. You can whack off to some metric stats all you want and bring up Lakers/Kobe a few more times ( owning a Laker troll as a spur fan and probably owning a magic johnson one as well), it doesn't change the standings.

Nope. You don't win anything extra for repeating. Until the NBA starts issuing additional trophies, they're meaningless.

I just tote 'em, like your hero Cub.

And as far as player vs. player goes, all that matters is:

Stats and individual hardware (yes, the media gets it wrong on the latter account, but since we live in 2016 [come join us], us fans have an endless amount of access to a variety of metrics and we can determine which players were deserving of said awards).

[Mitch]

Nope. You don't win anything extra for repeating. Until the NBA starts issuing additional trophies, they're meaningless.

I just tote 'em, like your hero Cub.

And as far as player vs. player goes, all that matters is:

Stats and individual hardware (yes, the media gets it wrong on the latter account, but since we live in 2016 [come join us], us fans have an endless amount of access to a variety of metrics and we can determine which players were deserving of said awards).

You validate your le, pulpy - but you wouldn't admit that since your boys could never do it. A le is all that matters, not accolades.

I just noticed you had Kobe in your sig, ing obsessed. The man is retiring and you need to keep his in your mouth

[midnightpulp]

You validate your le, pulpy - but you wouldn't admit that since your boys could never do it. A le is all that matters, not accolades.

I just noticed you had Kobe in your sig, ing obsessed. The man is retiring and you need to keep his in your mouth

Nope. You validate a le the year you win it. If not, the record books would say otherwise.

And you noticed Kobe in my sig because you're mad it's making fun of your favorite player

obsessed

[Mitch]

Nope. You validate a le the year you win it. If not, the record books would say otherwise.

And you noticed Kobe in my sig because you're mad it's making fun of your favorite player

obsessed

I didn't read it, don't care enough to. Just cute that you'd have a Laker in your sig

I'd say a le is only truly validated the second you show you can defend it, but I'm tired if you sniffing my farts. Just like with fathands and jacky chang, I don't have enough care to run in circles more than 1-2 times

Keep working on that magic t-cell account if that one is yours, terrible posting on that one so far

[midnightpulp]

I didn't read it, don't care enough to. Just cute that you'd have a Laker in your sig

I'd say a le is only truly validated the second you show you can defend it, but I'm tired if you sniffing my farts. Just like with fathands and jacky chang, I don't have enough care to run in circles more than 1-2 times

Keep working on that magic t-cell account if that one is yours, terrible posting on that one so far

That's what you say. Unfortunately the NBA doesn't agree with you.

Me sniffing your farts. You're the one who showed up in my thread, not the other way around. I usually don't pay attention to you otherwise.

Nah, T-Cells ain't mine.

[Darth_Pelican]

He wasn't a major force in the repeat, he was the force.

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=249232

[midnightpulp]

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=249232

[spursistan]

He wasn't a major force in the repeat, he was the force.

Kobe wouldn't get that FMVP if Pelton and Zach Lowe are the media types voters instead of antiquated fanboys like Adande and Wilbon..At least he didn't get opportunity to pad the season MVP count in the 2000s as other superior players were still in their prime..

[Thread]

Kobe wouldn't get that FMVP if

Stan, still stewin' over a gd doorstop.

ha.